Free Tissue Transfer in the Obese Patient

Philadelphia, Pa. From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.99). 05/2013; 131(5):681e-92e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828e2159
Source: PubMed


: The authors' institution has seen an increase in obese and morbidly obese patients seeking autologous breast reconstruction. The authors provide a comprehensive outcome analysis of patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction.
: The authors identified obese patients receiving free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction. World Health Organization body mass index criteria were used: nonobese (body mass index, 20 to 29.9 kg/m), class I (30 to 34.9 kg/m), class II (35 to 39.9 kg/m), and class III (>40 kg/m). Patient comorbidities, body mass index, complications (medical and surgical), and hospital resource use were examined.
: Eight-hundred twelve patients undergoing 1258 free tissue transfers for breast reconstruction were included. Overall, 66.5 percent (n = 540) were considered nonobese, 22.9 percent (n = 186) had class I obesity, 5.0 percent (n = 41) had class II, and 5.7 percent (n = 45) had class III. Obesity was associated with a significant increase in minor (p = 0.001) and major (p = 0.013) complications. Morbidly obese patients had significantly higher rates of total flap loss (p = 0.006) and longer operative times (p = 0.0002). Complications translated into greater cost and resource consumption (p < 0.001). Muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap experienced a significantly higher rate of hernia compared with other flaps (p = 0.02), without a difference in flap loss rate (p = 0.61).
: Increasing obesity is associated with increased perioperative risk in free abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction, which translated into greater perioperative morbidity, higher hospital cost, and increased health care resource consumption. Higher body mass index is directly related to intraoperative technical difficulty, flap loss, donor-site morbidity, and cost use.
: Risk, II.

29 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early loss of an implant is a serious complication following breast reconstruction. We assess perioperative risk factors associated with tissue expander (TE) loss following immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) using the ACS-NSQIP datasets. We reviewed the 2005-2010 ACS-NSQIP databases identifying encounters for CPT codes for IBR using TE (19357). Patients were identified as experiencing a "loss of graft/prosthetic" based on a defined dataset variable. Patients who experienced a TE loss were compared to those who did not with respect to peri-operative characteristics. 9305 patients were identified who were on average 51.0 ± 10.5 years. Average length of stay was 1.7 ± 1.7 days. Patients experiencing early TE loss tended to have higher BMI (P < 0.0001) and ages (P < 0.001), more often be obese (P < 0.001), be active smokers (P < 0.001), and have hypertension (P = 0.001). Patients experiencing TE loss also more frequently had longer operative times (P = 0.0002), total length of stay (P = 0.004), superficial surgical site infections (P = 0.004), and deep surgical infections (P < 0.0001). A multivariate regression analysis determined age (>55 years) (OR = 2.0, P = 0.004), obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m(2)) (OR = 1.7, P = 0.03), active smoking (OR = 4.0, P < 0.001), prolonged operative time (>1 SD above average) (OR = 2.2, P = 0.002), superficial wound infection (OR = 4.0, P = 0.002), and deep wound infection (OR = 9.1, P < 0.001) were associated with early TE loss. Early TE loss is a complex multifactorial process likely related to identifiable preoperative, modifiable risk factors and postoperative complications. This analysis highlights previous work demonstrating of the added risk of age, obesity, and active smoking.
    Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 07/2013; 66(11). DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.030 · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obesity is a growing epidemic in the United States (US) affecting more than 33% of adults. We aimed to use the World Health Organization (WHO) obesity stratification scheme to assess the overall risk of obese patients undergoing breast reconstruction using the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2010. We reviewed the 2005 to 2010 ACS-NSQIP databases identifying encounters for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes including either implant-based reconstruction (immediate, delayed, and tissue expander) or autologous reconstruction (pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous [pTRAM], free TRAM, and latissimus dorsi flap with or without implant). Patients were classified and compared based on WHO obesity criteria: nonobese (body mass index [BMI] = 20 to 29.9 kg/m(2)), class I (BMI = 30 to 34.9 kg/m(2)), class II (BMI = 35 to 39.9 kg/m(2)), and class III (BMI > 40 kg/m(2)). During the study period 15,937 breast reconstructions were performed. The majority of reconstructions were immediate reconstructions (85.0%) and implant-based (79.1%). The incidence of obesity was 27.1%, with 16.3% defined as class I obese, 6.9% defined as class II obese, and 4.0% defined as class III obese. The WHO-classified obese patients tended to have a progressively higher incidence of comorbid conditions, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (p < 0.001), longer operative times (p = 0.0001), and greater lengths of hospital stay (p = 0.0001). Progressively higher BMIs were associated with higher rates of complications, including wound (p < 0.001), medical (p < 0.001), infections (p < 0.001), major surgical (p < 0.001), graft and prosthesis loss (p < 0.001), and return to the operating room (p < 0.001). This study characterized the effect of progressive obesity on the incidence of surgical and medical complications after breast reconstruction using a large, prospective multicenter dataset. Increasing obesity is associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Data derived from this cohort study can be used to risk-stratify patients, enhance risk counseling, and advocate for institutional reimbursement in obese patients undergoing breast reconstruction.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 07/2013; 217(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.031 · 5.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical complications after breast reconstruction can be associated with significant morbidity, dissatisfaction, and cost. We used the ACS-NSQIP datasets from 2005 to 2011 to derive predictors of morbidity and to stratify risk after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Surgical complications after implant and autologous reconstruction were assessed using the ACS-NSQIP 2005 to 2011 datasets. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and operative factors were associated with the likelihood of experiencing a surgical complication. A "model cohort" of 12,129 patients was randomly selected from the study cohort to derive predictors. Weighted odds ratios derived from logistic regression analysis were used to create a composite risk score and to stratify patients. The remaining one-third of the cohort (n = 6,065) were used as the "validation cohort" to assess the accuracy value of the risk model. On adjusted analysis, autologous reconstruction (odds ratio [OR] 1.41, p < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥ 3 (OR 1.25, p = 0.004), class I obesity (OR 1.38, p < 0.001), class II obesity (OR 1.91, p < 0.001), class III obesity (OR 1.70, p < 0.001), and active smoking (OR 1.46, p < 0.001) were associated with complications. Risk factors were weighted and patients were stratified into low (0 to 2, n = 9,133, risk = 7.14%), intermediate (3 to 4, n = 1,935, risk = 10.90%), high (5 to 7, n = 1,024, risk = 16.70%), and very high (8 to 9, n = 37, risk = 27.02%) risk categories based on their total risk score (p < 0.001). Internal validation of the "model cohort" using the "validation cohort" was performed demonstrating accurate prediction of risk across groups: low (7.1% vs 7.1%, respectively, p = 0.9), intermediate (10.9% vs 12.0%, respectively, p = 0.38), high (16.7% vs 16.8%, respectively, p = 0.95), and very high (27.0% vs 30.0%, respectively, p = 1.0). Surgical complications after IBR are related to preoperatively identifiable factors that can be used to accurately risk stratify patients, which may assist with counseling, selection, and perioperative decision-making.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 09/2013; 217(5). DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.004 · 5.12 Impact Factor
Show more