Article

Lower extremity muscle functions during full squats.

School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Journal of applied biomechanics (Impact Factor: 0.9). 12/2008; 24(4):333-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this research was to determine the functions of the gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, soleus, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles about their associated joints during full (deep-knee) squats. Muscle function was determined from joint kinematics, inverse dynamics, electromyography, and muscle length changes. The subjects were six experienced, male weight lifters. Analyses revealed that the prime movers during ascent were the monoarticular gluteus maximus and vasti muscles (as exemplified by vastus lateralis) and to a lesser extent the soleus muscles. The biarticular muscles functioned mainly as stabilizers of the ankle, knee, and hip joints by working eccentrically to control descent or transferring energy among the segments during scent. During the ascent phase, the hip extensor moments of force produced the largest powers followed by the ankle plantar flexors and then the knee extensors. The hip and knee extensors provided the initial bursts of power during ascent with the ankle extensors and especially a second burst from the hip extensors adding power during the latter half of the ascent.

5 Bookmarks
 · 
740 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study was designed to investigate for vertical jumping the relationships between muscle actions, movement pattern and jumping achievement. Ten skilled jumpers performed jumps with preparatory countermovement. Ground reaction forces and cinematographic data were recorded. In addition, myoelectric activity (EMG) was recorded from seven leg muscles. EMG-signals were rectified and low-pass filtered to obtain EMG-levels. The latter, which were assumed to reflect activation levels, rose to a plateau in the sequence m. semitendinosus, long head of m. biceps femoris, m. gluteus maximus, m. vastus medialis, m. rectus femoris, m. soleus, m. gastrocnemius. It was attempted to link the EMG-pattern to the purpose of the push-off, namely to maximize the effective energy (Ey) of the mass center of the body (MCB). The term Ey designates the sum of the potential energy of MCB and the kinetic energy due to the vertical velocity of MCB. One of the requirements for maximization of Ey is that the mono-articular extensor muscles release as much energy as possible before toe-off occurs. It is argued that this requirement can only be satisfied if the vertical velocity differences between the proximal and distal ends of body segments reach their peaks in a sequence. The sequence that is realized by the pattern of muscular activation is upper body, upper legs, lower legs, feet. Another important requirement is that the mechanical energy released by the muscles is optimally used. This requirement can be satisfied by transportation of energy via the biarticular m. rectus femoris and m. gastrocnemius.
    Journal of Biomechanics 02/1988; 21(3):249-62. DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(88)90175-3 · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The function of two joint muscles in the human lower extremity was studied during a cycling task with efficiency of their action discussed in light of Lombard's Paradox. Special pedals were designed to monitor reaction forces parallel to the sagittal plane of the body. Net moments of force about the hip, knee and ankle and EMG patterns in selected lower extremity muscles were recorded in five subjects pedalling against a constant load. The most original aspect of this study was the clear difference in hip and knee action during the propulsive phase of the pedalling cycle. A knee flexor moment was consistently observed in all subjects starting approximately half way through the propulsive phase of crank rotation (0-180 degrees) and presented as a creative solution to Lombard's Paradox.
    Journal of Biomechanics 02/1985; 18(5):307-16. DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(85)90286-6 · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • Acta morphologica Neerlando-Scandinavica 02/1966; 6(4):377-86.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
928 Downloads
Available from
May 27, 2014