Article

Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline

INRA, Laboratoire Pollinisation & Ecologie des Abeilles, UMR406 Abeilles & Environnement, 84914 Avignon Cedex 9, France; INRA, UMR LAMETA, 2 place Viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France; CNRS, UMR LAMETA, 2 place Viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France; UFZ, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany
Ecological Economics (Impact Factor: 2.86). 02/2009; 68(3):810-821. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT There is mounting evidence of pollinator decline all over the world and consequences in many agricultural areas could be significant. We assessed these consequences by measuring 1) the contribution of insect pollination to the world agricultural output economic value, and 2) the vulnerability of world agriculture in the face of pollinator decline. We used a bioeconomic approach, which integrated the production dependence ratio on pollinators, for the 100 crops used directly for human food worldwide as listed by FAO. The total economic value of pollination worldwide amounted to €153 billion, which represented 9.5% of the value of the world agricultural production used for human food in 2005. In terms of welfare, the consumer surplus loss was estimated between €190 and €310 billion based upon average price elasticities of − 1.5 to − 0.8, respectively. Vegetables and fruits were the leading crop categories in value of insect pollination with about €50 billion each, followed by edible oil crops, stimulants, nuts and spices. The production value of a ton of the crop categories that do not depend on insect pollination averaged €151 while that of those that are pollinator-dependent averaged €761. The vulnerability ratio was calculated for each crop category at the regional and world scales as the ratio between the economic value of pollination and the current total crop value. This ratio varied considerably among crop categories and there was a positive correlation between the rate of vulnerability to pollinators decline of a crop category and its value per production unit. Looking at the capacity to nourish the world population after pollinator loss, the production of 3 crop categories – namely fruits, vegetables, and stimulants - will clearly be below the current consumption level at the world scale and even more so for certain regions like Europe. Yet, although our valuation clearly demonstrates the economic importance of insect pollinators, it cannot be considered as a scenario since it does not take into account the strategic responses of the markets.

17 Bookmarks
 · 
1,748 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most bee viruses are RNA viruses belonging to two major families of Dicistroviridae and Iflaviridae. During viral infection, virus-derived double stranded RNAs activate a major host innate immune pathway, namely the small interfering RNAs pathway (siRNA pathway), which degrades the viral RNA or the viral genome. This results in 21–22 nucleotide-long virus-derived siRNAs (vsiRNAs). Recent studies showed that vsiRNAs, matching to viruses from the family of Dicistroviridae and Iflaviridae, were generated in infected bees. Moreover, higher virus titers in honeybees also resulted in higher amounts of vsiRNAs, demonstrating that the siRNA response is proportional to the intensity of viral infection. Intriguingly, non-specific dsRNA could also trigger an immune response, leading to the restriction of the viral infection, however this mechanism is still unclear. Other findings demonstrated that bees can be protected through introducing virus specific-dsRNA to activate the siRNA response against the target virus. The latter is highlighting a new strategy to tackle bee viruses.
    01/2014; 6:22-27.
  • Source
    01/2013; WWF – World Wide Fund For Nature, Gland.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Insect pollinators, both managed and wild, have become a focus of global scientific, political and media attention because of their apparent decline and the perceived impact of this decline on crop production. Crop pollination by insects is an essential ecosystem service that increases the yield and quality of approximately 35% of crops worldwide. Pollinator declines are a consequence of multiple environmental pressures, e.g. habitat transformation and fragmentation, loss of floral resources, pesticides, pests and diseases, and climate change. Similar environmental pressures are faced in South Africa where there is a high demand for pollination services. In this paper, we synthesise data on the importance of different pollinators as a basis for services to South African crops and on the status of managed honeybees. We also focus on insect pollination services for the Western Cape deciduous fruit industry, which is worth ZAR9800 million per year and is heavily reliant on pollination services from managed honeybees. We discuss landscape and regional level floral resources needed to maintain sufficient numbers of managed honeybee colonies. In summary, the available literature shows a lack of data on diversity and abundance of crop pollinators, and a lack of long-term data to assess declines. We highlight key areas that require research in South Africa and emphasise the critical role of floral resource availability at the landscape and regional scale to sustain pollinators. We conclude that understanding the dynamics of how floral resources are used will help inform how landscapes could be better managed in order to provide long-term sustainable pollination services.
    South African Journal of Science 11/2014; 110(11/12):25-33. · 0.84 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
363 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014