Toward collective organizational values: a case study in UK construction

Construction Management and Economics 10/2008; 26(10):1009-1028. DOI: 10.1080/01446190802422146
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Values have held a prominent place in business ethics and organizational theories in recent years. Some organizations now aim to integrate values into their business practices, which requires a thorough understanding of the organizational values. However, while many believe organizational values should reflect the collective values of the staff, the majority of values statements are generated by senior management with little examination of employees' personal values. The difficulties surrounding the development of an organization's values are exacerbated by the dearth of literature offering practical guidance. The case study presented has been conducted in a UK construction company using Schwartz's theoretical framework of human values as a starting point and framing device. Employees' values profiles were collected and analysed through an organizational-wide values survey. Follow-up workshops and post-workshop activities facilitated the sharing of common values and helped staff representatives develop their own organizational values statements, independent of the senior management, before a final stage of negotiation with them. The findings support the argument that the shaping of collective organizational values should be based on a clear understanding and communication of employees' personal values, and Schwartz's circumplex model of values and associated survey instrument are helpful framing devices to initiate and structure such a debate. Compared to the usual management-imposed approach, this bottom-up process could make organizational values explicit in a more understandable and useful way, and improve values congruence between individuals and host organizations.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study investigates the relationship between cohesiveness and group effectiveness. The link between the two constructs is predicted to be moderated by the orientation (whether task or nontask) and strength of work group norms. Datafrom a 1995 survey of army units in the Danish military were used. Multiple regression was used to test hypotheses, and the results indicated strong supportfor the existence of a moderator
    Small Group Research 02/1998; 29(1):124-143. · 1.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using data obtained from 12 national samples contained in the General Social Survey over the period 1973 through 1990, this article analyzes the work value preferences of 7,436 full-time male and female workers, representing all major occupational classifications and all major industries. The data presented in the study provide no consistent support for general differences between men's and women's work values. Instead, the data suggest that regardless of gender, one's preference for a given work value depends, in large part, on one's age, education, and occupational prestige. The authors argue that alleged gender differences are minimal, at best, and continued emphasis on differences merely serves to reinforce traditional gender-role stereotypes and to perpetuate gender inequality in the workplace.
    Work and Occupations 01/1995; 22(2):215-229. · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • 01/1992; Free Pr.