Article

Prospective assessment of the impact of endometriomas and their removal on ovarian reserve and determinants of the rate of decline in ovarian reserve.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Gorukle, Bursa 16059, Turkey.
Human Reproduction (Impact Factor: 4.59). 04/2013; DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det123
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT STUDY QUESTION: Do the presence of endometriomas and their laparoscopic excision lead to a decrease in ovarian reserve as assessed by serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels? SUMMARY ANSWER: Both the presence and excision of endometriomas cause a significant decrease in serum AMH levels, which is sustained 6 months after surgery. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: No previous comparison of serum AMH levels between women with and without endometrioma has been reported. However, studies have suggested a decline in serum AMH levels 1-3 months after endometrioma excision but long-term data are needed. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective cohort study including 30 women with endometrioma >2 cm were age matched with 30 healthy women without ovarian cysts. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women with endometrioma underwent laparoscopic excision with the stripping technique. Serum AMH level and antral follicle count (AFC) were determined preoperatively, 1 and 6 months after surgery. Correlation analyses were undertaken in order to identify determinants of surgery-related change in ovarian reserve. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Compared with controls at baseline, women with endometrioma had lower AMH levels (4.2 ± 2.3 versus 2.8 ± 2.2 ng/ml, respectively, P = 0.02) and AFC (14.7 ± 4.1 versus 9.7 ± 4.8, respectively, P < 0.01). Serum AMH levels were further decreased 6 months after surgery (2.8 ± 2.2 versus 1.8 ± 1.3 ng/ml, P = 0.02), while AFC remained unchanged (9.7 ± 4.8 versus 10.4 ± 4.2, P = 0.63). The rate of decline in AMH was not correlated with age, laterality of endometrioma, cyst diameter or the number of primordial follicles on the surgical specimens. The preoperative serum AMH level was positively correlated with the rate of decline in serum AMH after surgery (r = 0.47, P = 0.02). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The absence of a non-treated group of women with endometriomas as a further control prevents comment on the presence of a progressive decline in ovarian reserve related to endometrioma per se. The sample size may be too small for detection of factors correlated with the extent of ovarian damage. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: While the findings are mostly in agreement with previous studies, the present study is the first to show that the presence of endometrioma per se is associated with a decrease in ovarian reserve. The extent of surgery-related decline in ovarian reserve is not predictable using preoperative or perioperative factors. It may be prudent to measure AMH levels preoperatively and delay/avoid surgical excision as far as is possible if subsequent fertility is a concern. Additional studies are required to further investigate whether the endometrioma-related decline in ovarian reserve per se is progressive in nature and whether it exceeds the surgery-related decline. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the Research Fund of the Uludag University School of Medicine. The authors have no conflict of interest associated with this study.

1 Follower
 · 
78 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We reviewed the literature to determine whether different hemostatic methods used following laparoscopic endometrioma excision vary in their effect on ovarian reserve. A systematic literature search using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and OVID MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations databases was done to identify studies comparing the rate of change in serum AMH three months after laparoscopic endometrioma excision using bipolar dessication (BD) or suturing/application of a hemostatic sealant (HS) for hemostasis. Abstracts of the annual meetings of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, and the American Association of Gynecological Laparoscopists were also searched. 712 articles were identified. Of these 6 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Four studies involving 213 women were included in the meta-analysis. Qualititative analysis suggested BD was more detrimental to ovarian reserve than alternative hemostatic methods. There's moderate quality evidence favoring HS and low quality evidence favoring sutures over BD. The meta-analysis also showed that alternative hemostatic methods were associated with a significantly lesser decline in ovarian reserve than BD. The mean decline in serum AMH levels was 6.95% less with alternative hemostatic methods than BD (95% CI - 13.0% to - 0.9%, p = 0.02) 3 months after surgery. According to the best available evidence the use of BD should be cautiously limited, even avoided when possible, during endometrioma excision in women who desire to have children. Copyright © 2015 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 01/2015; 22(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.168 · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The usefulness of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) for the quantitative evaluation of ovarian reserve has been established. Therefore, serum AMH has been recently applied to the assessment of ovarian reserve outside infertility treatment. We conducted a computer-based search, using keywords, through the PubMed database from inception until May 2014 and summarized available studies evaluating ovarian damage caused by gynecologic diseases, such as endometriosis and ovarian tumor, as well as surgical interventions, such as cystectomy and uterine artery embolization (UAE), to discuss the usefulness of serum AMH. Most of the studies demonstrated a decline of serum AMH levels after cystectomy for endometriomas. It is not conclusive whether electrocoagulation or suturing is preferable. The effects of other gynecologic diseases and interventions, such as hysterectomy and UAE, on ovarian reserve are controversial. Serum AMH levels should be considered in determining the indication and selection of operative methods for benign gynecologic conditions.
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 12/2014; 12(1):125. DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-12-125 · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study if ultrasound-guided aspiration with ethanol sclerosis is a safe and effective treatment for endometriomas. We conducted a prospective study of 25 women with 27 endometriomas (two bilateral) measuring 4-10cm in diameter with no suspected malignancy, who underwent ultrasound-guided aspiration and ethanol sclerosis between August 2010 and July 2014. Patients were followed up by ultrasound at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months to identify rates of complication and recurrence. Clinical characteristics of the patients (age, history of infertility, previous surgery, and abdominal pain), the cysts (location, diameter, and volume) and the procedure (duration and complications) were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyze the recurrence rates by SPSS statistical software. The recurrence rate after sclerosis was 12%. The mean length of follow-up was 17 (SD 9.9) months. Although no major procedure-related complications were recorded, minor complications included three cases of low abdominal pain during the procedure (10.7%) and two cases of abdominal ethanol extravasation (7.1%). Ultrasound-guided aspiration and ethanol sclerotherapy are a safe and effective treatment for endometriomas measuring 4-10cm in diameter with no evidence of malignancy. This conservative treatment could possibly achieve a symptomatic cure while preserving healthy ovarian tissue, thereby improving fertility outcomes and avoiding early menopause. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 02/2015; 187C:25-29. DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.004 · 1.63 Impact Factor