The relative patient benefit of gross total resection in adult choroid plexus papillomas
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Room 779 M, San Francisco, California 94143-0112, USA. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
(Impact Factor: 1.38).
04/2013; 20(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.08.003
Choroid plexus papillomas are rare neuroepithelial tumors found mainly in children. Although well studied in the pediatric population, there is a paucity of literature focusing specifically on adults. We sought to assess the relative advantage of gross total resection (GTR) and further characterize the natural history of this disease in adults. A comprehensive PubMed search was performed to identify adults who underwent surgical resection for choroid plexus papillomas with clearly reported age, tumor location, and extent of resection. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 193 patients were identified with a mean age of 39.9±1.1years. GTR was achieved in 72% of patients with subtotal resection (STR) in 28%. GTR was associated with a significant increase in both PFS (p=0.015) and OS (p=0.004) compared to STR. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model we found that only GTR was associated with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]=0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.90), while both age (HR=1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05) and GTR (HR=0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.78) were associated with OS. Interestingly, our observed recurrence and death rates were higher than those in previously published studies. These findings demonstrate the benefit of GTR for the treatment of choroid plexus papillomas in adults. Our analysis suggests that these lesions are not as indolent as previously thought and while GTR is preferred, it is not always curative.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.