Article

The effect of a manual therapy knee protocol on osteoarthritic knee pain: a randomised controlled trial.

Macquarie Injury Management Group, Department of Health and Chiropractic, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
JCCA. Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. Journal de l'Association chiropratique canadienne 01/2009; 52(4):229-42.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent condition with a significant socioeconomic burden to society. It is known to effect sufferers through pain, loss of function and changes in health related quality of life. Management typically involves pharmacologic and/or exercise based therapy approaches to reduce pain. Previous studies have shown multimodal treatment approaches incorporating manual therapy to be efficacious. The aim of this study is to determine if a manual therapy technique knee protocol can alter the self reported pain experienced by a group of chronic knee osteoarthritis sufferers in a randomised controlled trial.
43 participants with a chronic, non-progressive history of osteoarthritic knee pain, aged between 47 and 70 years were randomly allocated following a screening procedure to an intervention group (n=26; 18 men and 8 women, mean age 56.5 years) or a control group (n=17; 11 men and 6 women, mean age 54.6 years). Participants were matched for present knee pain intensity measured on a visual analogue scale. The intervention consisted of the Macquarie Injury Management Group Knee Protocol whilst the control involved a non-forceful manual contact to the knee followed by interferential therapy set at zero. Participants received three treatments per week for two consecutive weeks with a follow up immediately after the final treatment. Post-treatment Participants completed 11 questions including present knee pain intensity and feedback regarding their response to treatment utilizing a visual analogue scale. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics.
Prior to the intervention, there was no significant differences in age or present knee pain intensity. Following treatment, the intervention group reported a significant decrease in the present pain severity (mean 1.9) when compared to the control group (mean 3.1). Response to treatment questions indicated that compared to the control group, the intervention group felt the intervention had helped them (intervention mean 7.0; control mean 3.4), felt it decreased their knee symptoms such as crepitus (intervention mean 6.0; control mean 3.4) and improved their knee mobility (intervention mean 6.4; control mean 3.4) and their ability to perform general activities (intervention mean 6.5; control mean 3.8). Importantly the MIMG Knee Protocol intervention group reported no adverse reactions during treatment.
A short-term manual therapy knee protocol significantly reduced pain suffered by participants with osteoarthritic knee pain and resulted in improvements in self-reported knee function immediately after the end of the 2 week treatment period.

1 Bookmark
 · 
183 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate an adjunctive treatment modality for pain associated with knee disorders was conducted utilizing a therapeutic laser system (low energy, non-surgical). Subjects and methods: The therapeutic laser system utilized a dual wavelength, multiple diode laser cluster probe with five super-pulsed 905 nm near-infrared (NIR) laser diodes, each emitting at 40 mW average power and four continuous wave 660 nm visible (VIS) red laser diodes, each emitting at 25 mW. It was used as an adjunctive modality providing 12 treatments, three times a week to a homogeneous patient population (n = 126), in combination with standardized chiropractic techniques, to evaluate effectiveness on subjects presenting with osteoarthritis and knee pain. The primary endpoint was measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) to assess pain levels on a scale of 0 – 10. The success criteria for an individual patient in this study were identified as an improvement of 30 % or more in the VAS from baseline to 12th treatment and/or an improvement of 20 % or more in the VAS from baseline to 30-day follow-up evaluation. Results: The data obtained in the study demonstrated that the present therapeutic laser system provided significant pain relief and osteoarthritic improvements in all primary evaluation criteria, with a statistical and clinical significance of p < 0.01 in VAS from baseline to the 30-day follow-up.
    Photonics and Lasers in Medicine. 10/2012; 1(4):299-307.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study design Pretest-posttest observational parallel-group design. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of passive knee extension mobilization in addition to exercise therapy on extension range of motion (ROM) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Secondary objectives were to determine changes in pain and functional abilities. Background Patients with knee OA complain of pain, limited range of motion, and impaired activities. Efficacy of mobilization as a treatment option next to exercises has not been studied rigorously. Methods and Measures Thirty-four participants with persistent knee pain, a positive radiography for knee OA, and a passive extension deficit were included. Seventeen participants (mean age ± SD, 59.8 ± 6.1 years) were treated with an exercise protocol and were additionally given manual mobilizations to improve passive extension ROM. The other group (mean age ± SD, 61.5 ± 7.3 years) with equal characteristics was treated with an identical exercise therapy protocol only. Prior to participation, detailed ROM measurements were recorded next to muscle function tests, pain (VAS), six-minute walking tests (6MWT), a condition-specific questionnaire, and the patient-specific function scale (PSFS). Participants in both groups completed 16 treatment sessions each. Results Passive mobilizations significantly improved extension ROM in the intervention group (5.2 versus 8.6 degrees, p = .017). The manually mobilized group also had better physical capacities as assessed by 6MWT, less pain, and a lower PSFS score. Conclusion A combined protocol including exercise therapy and passive mobilization was beneficial for patients with OA of the knee complaining of pain, decreased extension ROM and decreased limited abilities. Level of evidence Therapy, 2b.
    The Knee 06/2014; · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose This review highlights seminal publications of rehabilitation interventions and outcomes in osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee. Methods Medline, CINAHL, and Embase databases from September 2010 through August 2011 were searched using the key words ‘osteoarthritis’, rehabilitation, physical therapy, exercise, and outcome(s), limited to human and English. Rehabilitation intervention studies were included if they were randomized trials (RCT), systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Studies of surgical interventions were excluded unless they included evaluation of a rehabilitation intervention. Outcome studies were included if they contributed methodologically to advancing outcome measurement. Reviews of measurement properties of outcomes were excluded. Eight publications were selected and reviewed that relate to interventions evaluating manual therapy in hip or knee OA, tele-rehabilitation and performance and participation measures as outcomes. Results Interventions: One systematic review of hip and knee OA, one meta-analysis of knee OA provide limited support for the benefit of manual therapy with exercise for improving pain and function to a lesser extent in the short-term (3 months). Study quality overall was low. One high quality RCT in knee replacement of usual outpatient physiotherapy vs internet-based tele-rehabilitation based on a non-inferiority analysis demonstrated comparable outcomes on Western Ontario McMaster Universities’ Osteoarthritis questionnaire (WOMAC) pain and function and performance measures. Outcomes: Three studies demonstrated that observed performance measures such as timed walk tests and stair-climbing and timed-up-and-go measure concepts differ from self-report of difficulty with physical function. Additionally, two studies showed differential times of recovery following total knee replacement (TKR). Two studies evaluated participation. One demonstrated the conceptual distinction of activity limitations and participation and a second re-analyzed trial data from knee OA studies. In one study, there were larger effects in combined activity/participation than for activity alone for arthroscopic lavage compared to intraarticular steroid and, in a second study, the effect was larger for activity with an advanced pharmacy intervention whereas the physiotherapy intervention demonstrated a larger effect for activity/participation. Conclusions Interventions of manual therapy for hip and knee OA provided limited evidence of effectiveness. These studies are of limited quality due to lack of blinding and disclosure of co-intervention. Tele-rehabilitation may be a viable option to improve access to rehabilitation post joint replacement for those in rural and remote areas. Data continue to support the need to include performance measures as well as patient-reported outcomes in evaluating outcomes in OA. Additionally, measures of participation should be considered as core outcomes.
    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 09/2011; 19. · 4.26 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
68 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014