Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status of the US population: 1988-1994 compared with 2000-2004.

National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 6.5). 01/2009; 88(6):1519-27. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26182
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Changes in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations in the US population have not been described.
We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) to compare serum 25(OH)D concentrations in the US population in 2000-2004 with those in 1988-1994 and to identify contributing factors.
Serum 25(OH)D was measured with a radioimmunoassay kit in 20 289 participants in NHANES 2000-2004 and in 18 158 participants in NHANES III (1988-1994). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from measured height and weight. Milk intake and sun protection were assessed by questionnaire. Assay differences were assessed by re-analyzing 150 stored serum specimens from NHANES III with the current assay.
Age-adjusted mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations were 5-20 nmol/L lower in NHANES 2000-2004 than in NHANES III. After adjustment for assay shifts, age-adjusted means in NHANES 2000-2004 remained significantly lower (by 5-9 nmol/L) in most males, but not in most females. In a study subsample, adjustment for the confounding effects of assay differences changed mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations by approximately 10 nmol/L, and adjustment for changes in the factors likely related to real changes in vitamin D status (ie, BMI, milk intake, and sun protection) changed mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations by 1-1.6 nmol/L.
Overall, mean serum 25(OH)D was lower in 2000-2004 than 1988-1994. Assay changes unrelated to changes in vitamin D status accounted for much of the difference in most population groups. In an adult subgroup, combined changes in BMI, milk intake, and sun protection appeared to contribute to a real decline in vitamin D status.

  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 02/2011; 93(3):479-480. · 6.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little is known about correlates of vitamin D status in Asian populations. In this study, we established the prevalence of vitamin D sufficiency in the Murakami region (latitude N38°13') in Niigata, Japan, and examined demographic, environmental, and lifestyle factors that might be associated with vitamin D sufficiency, with the aim of clarifying the relative contributions of previously described determinants of vitamin D status as well as identifying new determinants in this Japanese population. This study involved a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data obtained from a cohort study conducted in 2011-2013. Participants were 9,084 individuals aged between 40 and 74years who provided blood samples for the determination of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations. Lifestyle information was obtained from 8,498 participants, with some missing values regarding different lifestyle factors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to obtain odds ratios for vitamin D sufficiency, which was defined as a plasma 25(OH)D concentration ≥75nmol/L. The prevalence of vitamin D sufficiency (i.e., plasma 25(OH)D concentration ≥75nmol/L) was 9.1%, and significant associations were observed with male gender (P<0.0001; OR=2.37, 95%CI: 1.84-3.05), older age (P for trend <0.0001), lower BMI (P for trend <0.0001), higher METs score (P for trend=0.0138), higher vitamin D intake (P for trend=0.0467), summer season (P for trend <0.0001), longer duration outdoors (P for trend=0.0026), no sunscreen use (P=0.0135; OR=1.40, 95% CI: 1.07-1.82), higher salmon consumption (P for trend <0.0001), higher alcohol consumption (P for trend <0.0001), and lower coffee consumption (P for trend=0.0025). Unlike other populations previously reported, vitamin D sufficiency was associated with older age. The prevalence of vitamin D sufficiency (i.e., 25[OH]D ≥75nmol/L) was low (9.1%) in this Japanese population. A number of demographic, environmental, and lifestyle factors are associated with vitamin D sufficiency, and thus lifestyle modification may present an opportunity to achieve vitamin D sufficiency. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Bone 01/2015; 74. · 4.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether the obese population is more likely to be vitamin D deficient compared to healthy and overweight individuals. A retrospective chart review was performed for patients seen in two ambulatory clinics in South Florida over a 1-year period (n=402). Patients' vitamin D levels drawn during annual wellness visits were analyzed. Subjects were categorized based on body mass index (BMI) as normal (BMI <24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9), and obese (BMI >30.0). Their 25-OH vitamin D status was defined as normal (>30 ng/mL), insufficient (20.0-29.9 ng/mL), and deficient (<20 ng/mL). The study included both men and women of black, white, Hispanic, and Asian races. Other variables in the study included age, history of hypertension, and diabetes. Patients with conditions leading to vitamin D malabsorption (chronic pancreatitis, celiac disease, Crohn's disease, cystic fibrosis, ileocecal resection) were excluded. Patients with prior vitamin D supplementation were also excluded. The results of the study indicated a significant association of vitamin D deficiency and obesity (p<0.05). Patients who were obese had a relative risk of 3.36 (95% CI: 1.50-7.54) for vitamin D deficiency compared to subjects with normal BMI. The study also showed a significant association between vitamin D levels and obesity when controlling for age, race, and presence of hypertension (p <0.05), with Asians and blacks more likely to be vitamin D deficient. These results demonstrated that obesity was a risk factor for vitamin D deficiency in all races, especially the Asian and black populations. This suggests that physicians should screen for vitamin D deficiency in the obese populations, especially among Asian and black races.
    Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives. 02/2015; 5(1):26069.


Available from