Hitting the Poorest Places Hardest: The local and regional impact of welfare reform

Publisher: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, ISBN: 978-1-843-8736-00


Given that benefit claimants are not spread evenly across the country, the large scale reform of the welfare system results in differential impact across the country. However, limited information existed in government documentation on the distribution of the impacts across the country. This research aims to plug the information gap by quantifying the overall impact of welfare reforms, and the impacts of individual benefit changes, for every local authority across Britain by 2014/15. The report highlights the scale of the reforms, shows the financial losses will hit some places much harder than others and that in general the most deprived areas in Britain are hit the hardest.

1 Follower
49 Reads
  • Source
    • "Estimated impact of welfare cuts to 2014/15 – financial loss of benefits per working age adult, English core cities (£s per year: index GB = 100; £470) Source: Based on figures in Beatty and Fothergill (2013) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A key feature of the rise of neoliberal politics and policy has been the progressive shift of risk from corporations and national states to the local government, individuals and households. In this article, we argue that, in the UK, ‘great risk shift’ has not only been intensified by recession and austerity but has also been marked by the unevenness of the redistribution of risk and insecurity across scales and places, and between different types of household. In order to capture the differentiated nature of experiences and impacts of recession, risk and insecurity, this article first considers the spatial and temporal dynamics of recession and the great risk shift. It then goes on to localise and embed these dynamics within the city regions and local authorities of Bristol and Liverpool, drawing on a quantitative survey of 1,013 households, across a range of different household types. The survey was segmented geographically and by ten different household types using Ipsos-MORI’s (ACORN) classification of residential neighbourhoods. Whilst the evolving crisis and subsequent austerity measure have been a ‘moving target’ for cities, the local government and households, the household survey was undertaken in the two city regions in the winter of 2011 and explored experiences and impacts since 2008. It will seek to demonstrate the nature, impact and ‘lived experience’ of the ‘risk shift’ during this period and consider the ongoing and broader implications for households, and national and local policymakers.
    Local Government Studies 05/2015; DOI:10.1080/03003930.2015.1036986 · 0.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In June 2014 the BBC reported that it had seen a number of UK Department for Work and Pensions documents relating to the Employment and Support Allowance (ESA). These documents, which included six memos written by civil servants and government advisers, tell us very little that we did not know already; namely that the ESA is in crisis, and that waiting lists for assessment and appeals are unacceptable. However, what is significant is that these concerns are being raised within the Department for Work and Pensions itself. The underlying drift is that the question of whether the current model of ESA and Work Capability Assessment is sustainable is now firmly on the UK government's radar.
    Disability & Society 06/2014; 29(8):1319-1323. DOI:10.1080/09687599.2014.948746 · 0.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    BMJ Clinical Research 12/2014; 349(dec02 12):g7350. DOI:10.1136/bmj.g7350 · 14.09 Impact Factor
Show more