Identificazione di una batteria di test per la valutazione dei disturbi cognitivi nella sindrome di Rett

Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo 08/2009; XIII(2):327-354.


Rett syndrome (RS) is a pervasive developmental disorder with evident neurological
and genetic components, characterised by a severe mental delay. During the first period of
life, a regression is showed by a lack of acquired motor skills, of linguistic achievement and of a
stereotyped and inappropriate use of hands. Currently, diagnosis is mainly obtained through clinical
criteria. Aim of present study is to identify a battery of test that suits to clinical characteristic
of RS in order to describe more precisely the developmental profile of this syndrome

Download full-text


Available from: Maria Rosa Pizzamiglio, Oct 06, 2015
161 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to explore concurrent validity of the age equivalent and standard scores of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID II) Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2), including correlations and clinical agreement between the scores of the two tests. One hundred ten children aged three to 41 months who were referred to an early childhood evaluation program because of concerns about their development were administered both the BSID II Motor Scale and the PDMS-2 as part of their developmental evaluations. The correlation coefficients were high to very high for age-equivalent scores, and the Locomotion Subscale had the closest agreement with the BSID II Motor Scale age equivalent. The correlation coefficients were moderate to high for standard scores, and there was only slight agreement between the tests for standard score categories. More than 75% of the 70 children in this study whose scores on the BSID II supported eligibility for services based on scores at least two SD below the mean of the test would not have qualified for services if the PDMS-2 standard scores alone were used to assess their eligibility. Approximately half the children who showed appropriate total motor performance on the PDMS-2 were classified as delayed on the BSID II Motor Scale. The study supports concurrent validity of the tests only for certain subscale age-equivalent scores, particularly the BSID II Motor Scale with the PDMS-2 Locomotion Subscale. The current findings suggest that the standard scores show poor agreement and have low concurrent validity. There are marked differences in the standard scores of the two tests that may affect a child's eligibility for services in some states, and therapists should be cautious when making clinical decisions based solely on standard scores of one test.
    Pediatric Physical Therapy 02/2004; 16(3):149-56. DOI:10.1097/01.PEP.0000136005.41585.FE · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This longitudinal study of 161 African American children from low-income families examined multiple influences, including early childhood interventions and characteristics of the child and family, on longitudinal patterns of children's cognitive performance measured between 6 months and 8 years of age. Results indicate that more optimal patterns of cognitive development were associated with intensive early educational child care, responsive stimulating care at home, and higher maternal IQ. In accordance with a general systems model, analyses also suggested that child care experiences were related to better cognitive performance in part through enhancing the infant's responsiveness to his or her environment. Maternal IQ had both a direct effect on cognitive performance during early childhood and, also, an indirect effect through its influence on the family environment.
    Child Development 07/1997; 68(5):935 - 954. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01972.x · 4.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Humane-egalitarian ideals, whose aims are group justice and reducing environmental inequality and privilege, must be tested against reality, as revealed by psychology and other social sciences. Four issues are addressed: the equation between IQ and intelligence, whether group potential is determined by a group's mean IQ, whether the Black–White IQ gap is genetic, and the meritocratic thesis that genes for IQ will become highly correlated with class. Massive IQ gains over time test the IQ–intelligence equation, reveal groups who achieve far beyond their mean IQs, and falsify prominent arguments for a genetic racial IQ gap. Class IQ trends suggest America is not evolving toward a meritocracy, but a core refutation of that thesis is needed and supplied. Finally, the viability of humane ideals is assessed against a worst-case scenario. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
    American Psychologist 12/1998; 54(1):5-20. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.54.1.5 · 6.87 Impact Factor
Show more