A measles eradication goal is upon us; can rubella and congenital rubella syndrome be far behind?

Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, United States. Electronic address: .
Vaccine (Impact Factor: 3.62). 04/2013; 31(24). DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.019
Source: PubMed
9 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study an analysis was made of economic costs and medical effects (by cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis) associated with measles vaccination in a hypothetical Western European country. We analysed ten vaccination options in terms of past and future vaccination coverage. We show that several of the proposed strategies for improving measles vaccination coverage are preferable to maintaining the existing policies, regardless of past coverage and the viewpoint of the analysis. For society, very high coverage (95%) two-dose vaccination is most optimal, irrespective of past vaccination coverage. The addition of a one-time campaign (to reduce susceptibility in (pre-)adolescent age groups) to such a high coverage two-dose vaccination programme is cost-saving to the health-care payer and to society when coverage in the past was low (< or = 70%). Even when coverage in the past was high (90%) for more than a decade, this 'maximum strategy' could be implemented at an acceptable cost to the health-care payer (incremental direct costs per discounted life-year gained < 30,000 Euros), and at net savings to society.
    Epidemiology and Infection 04/2003; 130(2):273-83. DOI:10.1017/S0950268802008142 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 1994, the Americas set a goal of interrupting indigenous measles transmission from the Western Hemisphere by 2000. To accomplish this goal, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) developed an enhanced measles vaccination strategy. Cost data was collected at PAHO for Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries covering 96% of the region's population on components of the routine programs, and the 'follow-up' activities from member countries. In order to interpret our findings we have compared the present scenario regarding measles with one that would have ensued if past trends continued. For the entire LAC population, estimated cost of elimination program will be US$ 571 million in present value terms. The vaccination strategy toward achieving elimination of measles costs USD 244 million, incremental from the cost of vaccination before the elimination program. Within 2000-2020, the current program will have prevented the occurrence of 3.2 million cases of measles and 16,000 deaths. Thus, vaccination strategy prevents a single case of measles at the cost of USD 71.75 and prevents a death due to measles at the cost of USD 15,000. The case fatality rate depends on a well functioning treatment program for measles cases. The vaccination strategy saves a total of USD 208 million in treatments costs due to reduced incidence of measles.
    Vaccine 10/2002; 20(27-28):3332-41. DOI:10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00296-7 · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Measles outbreaks continue to occur in Europe as a result of suboptimum vaccination coverage. This article aims to describe individuals susceptible to measles, and provide an overview of affected groups and the public settings in which measles transmission occurred in Europe in 2005-2009. Individuals susceptible to measles were described and categorized on the basis of factors leading to nonvaccination and vaccine failure. A literature search was conducted to identify affected groups and public settings in which measles transmission occurred. Most individuals susceptible to measles are previously uninfected and unvaccinated. The reasons for nonvaccination in individuals eligible for vaccination ranged from lack of information to poor access to health care. Several outbreaks have emerged in Roma and Sinti, Traveller, anthroposophic, and ultra-orthodox Jewish communities, and immigrants identifying them as being particularly at risk. Public settings for transmission included mostly educational and health care facilities. Improved efforts are needed to strengthen immunization programs, identify barriers for measles-containing vaccine uptake, and explore methods to target vulnerable populations that are not being reached with routine immunization delivery services. Specific measures are needed to prevent and control measles in educational and health care facilities. Failure to identify who gets measles and implement the elimination strategies raises concerns for the successful and sustainable elimination of measles in Europe.
    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 07/2011; 204 Suppl 1(suppl 1):S353-65. DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir067 · 6.00 Impact Factor
Show more