Preparation of a severely obese adolescent for significant and long-term weight loss: An illustrative case

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA, .
Pediatric Surgery International (Impact Factor: 1). 04/2013; 29(8). DOI: 10.1007/s00383-013-3311-y
Source: PubMed


For severely obese patients planning bariatric surgery, many surgeons advise pre-operative weight loss which can be difficult for some to achieve. We report a 16-year-old male who was referred for weight loss surgery in a very late stage of severe obesity with a weight and BMI of 310 kg and 93 kg/m(2), respectively. He also suffered from obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension. To prepare him for laparoscopic gastric bypass, a strict pre-operative nutritional intervention with inpatient and outpatient phases was designed. He lost 22 kg pre-operatively and an additional 86 kg by 67 months post-operatively, representing a 35 % total reduction in BMI. This case illustrates the feasibility and value of a defined pre-operative dietary intervention to effectively manage the weight of an adolescent referred late in the progression of severe obesity.

Download full-text


Available from: Thomas Inge, Oct 04, 2015
103 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extremely obese adolescents are increasingly undergoing bariatric procedures, which restrict dietary intake. However, as yet, no data are available describing the change in caloric density or composition of the adolescent bariatric patient's diet pre- and postoperatively. Our objective was to assess the 1-year change in the dietary composition of adolescents undergoing bariatric surgery at a tertiary care children's hospital. A total of 27 subjects (67% female, 77% white, age 16.7 ± 1.4 yr, baseline body mass index 60.1 ± 14.1 kg/m(2)) were prospectively enrolled into an observational cohort study 1 month before undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from August 2005 to March 2008. The 3-day dietary intake was recorded at baseline (n = 24) and 2 weeks (n = 16), 3 months (n = 11), and 1 year (n = 9) postoperatively. The dietary record data were verified by structured interview and compared with the Dietary Reference Intake values for ages 14-18 years. By 1 year after surgery, the mean caloric intake, adjusted for body mass index was 1015 ± 182 kcal/d, a 35% reduction from baseline. The proportion of fat, protein, and carbohydrate intake did not differ from baseline. However, the protein intake was lower than recommended postoperatively. The calcium and fiber intake was also persistently lower than recommended. Calcium and vitamin B(12) supplementation increased the likelihood of meeting the daily minimal recommendations (P ≤ .02). At 1 year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the adolescents' caloric intake remained restricted, with satisfactory macronutrient composition but a lower than desirable intake of calcium, fiber, and protein.
    Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 12/2011; 8(3):331-6. DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2011.11.016 · 4.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of this study was to understand the mechanisms of greater weight loss by gastric bypass (GBP) compared to gastric banding (GB) surgery. Obese weight- and age-matched subjects were studied before (T0), after a 12 kg weight loss (T1) by GBP (n = 11) or GB (n = 9), and at 1 year after surgery (T2). peptide YY(3-36) (PYY(3-36)), ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), leptin, and amylin were measured after an oral glucose challenge. At T1, glucose-stimulated GLP-1 and PYY levels increased significantly after GBP but not GB. Ghrelin levels did not change significantly after either surgery. In spite of equivalent weight loss, leptin and amylin decreased after GBP, but not after GB. At T2, weight loss was greater after GBP than GB (P = 0.003). GLP-1, PYY, and amylin levels did not significantly change from T1 to T2; leptin levels continued to decrease after GBP, but not after GB at T2. Surprisingly, ghrelin area under the curve (AUC) increased 1 year after GBP (P = 0.03). These data show that, at equivalent weight loss, favorable GLP-1 and PYY changes occur after GBP, but not GB, and could explain the difference in weight loss at 1 year. Mechanisms other than weight loss may explain changes of leptin and amylin after GBP.
    Obesity 06/2010; 18(6):1085-91. DOI:10.1038/oby.2009.473 · 3.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Minimal acute pre-operative weight loss significantly reduces liver size and intra-abdominal adipose tissue. We hypothesize that these changes will reduce intra-operative complications and reduce the difficulty of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). This is a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who had undergone isolated LRYGBP between July 2003 and March 2005. All patients participated in our institution's medically supervised Weight Management Program before surgery. 48 patients (Weight Loss Group) had an average percent loss of excess weight (%EWL) of 4.6; whereas 47 patients (No Weight Loss Group) gained an average of 4.8% of excess weight over an average period of 2.4 and 3 months (P=0.09), respectively. There were no differences between the two groups in age, gender, ASA class, co-morbidities, or BMI at operation. The Weight Loss Group had less intra-operative blood loss (102 vs 72 ml, P=.03). The surgeon was also less likely to report an enlarged liver in the Weight Loss Group (P=.02). Finally, the operation was less likely to deviate from the standard LRYGBP when patients lost weight (P=.02). No differences were seen in operative time, length of hospital stay, wound infections, or major complications. Acute preoperative weight loss is associated with less intra-operative blood loss and reduces the need for intraoperative deviation from the standard LRYGBP. A larger series with a greater reduction in excess weight is necessary to determine the maximal benefits of acute preoperative weight loss.
    Obesity Surgery 11/2005; 15(10):1396-402. DOI:10.1381/096089205774859155 · 3.75 Impact Factor
Show more