Article

The Two Faces of Market Support – How Deployment Policies Affect Technological Exploration and Exploitation in the Solar Photovoltaic Industry

ETH Zurich, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Research Policy (Impact Factor: 2.85). 02/2013; 42(4):989-1003. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.002

ABSTRACT The recent years have seen a strong rise in policies aiming to increase the diffusion of clean energy technologies. While there is general agreement that such deployment policies have been very effective in bringing technologies to the market, it is less understood how these policies affect technological innovation. To shed more light on this important question, we conducted comparative case studies with a global sample of 9 firms producing solar photovoltaic (PV) modules, complemented by in-depth interviews with 16 leading PV industry experts. We propose that, on the one hand, policy-induced market growth serves as an important catalyst for innovative activity as it raises the absolute level of firm investments in technological exploration. On the other hand, however, deployment policies create an incentive for firms pursuing more mature technologies to shift their balance between exploitation and exploration toward exploitation. Firms focusing on less mature technologies cannot tap the potentials of exploitative learning to the same extent as those with more mature technologies. Therefore, stimulating strong market growth may raise the barrier to market entry for less mature technologies. We conclude that, when designing deployment policies, great care should be taken to avoid adverse effects on technological diversity and a premature lock-in into more established technologies.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
147 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research has identified several reasons why fleet managers are good candidates to be electric vehicle (EV) early adopters such as their intense usage and high automobile purchase rates. This expectation is supported by a recent study which found that to 2013, governments and private companies were responsible for a majority of global EV purchases. Using content analysis of fleet manager interviews and pilot project reports, this study investigated 14 US and Dutch organizations that adopted EVs from 2010 to 2013 to determine which factors influenced their purchase decisions. In addition, it also analyzed the reasons why these same firms did or did not expand their EV fleets. Fleet managers identified testing new technologies as being the overarching driver of their initial adoption of EVs. Organizations also noted several influential but secondary factors including lowering their environmental impact, government grants, and improving the organization’s public image. For organizations that decided to expand their EV fleets, the primary motivating rationales were firm-specific, including pursuing first-mover advantage, specialized operational capabilities, or a compelling business model.
    Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment 01/2014; 31:126-134. · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In recent years, policy approaches that build upon the notion of innovation systems have enjoyed increasing attention in science, technology and innovation policy. But while the usefulness of systemic thinking in policy-making has been demonstrated in a large number of empirical settings, we still lack a detailed understanding of the dynamics at play when policy makers address systemic problems. In this paper, we show how complex interdependencies and the uncertain nature of technological change shape the process of targeted policy interventions in socio-technical systems. Towards this end we analyzed the evolution of the German feed-in tariff (FIT) system for solar photovoltaic power, a highly effective and widely copied policy instrument targeted at fostering the diffusion and development of renewable energy technologies. We find that the policy has been subject to a considerable amount of changes, many of which are the result of policy makers addressing specific system issues and bottlenecks. Interestingly, however, often these issues themselves were driven by unforeseen technological developments induced by previous policy interventions. We argue that the pattern of policy serving as both a solution to and a driver of technological bottlenecks shows strong similarities with what Rosenberg (1969) called ‘compulsive sequences’ in the development of technical systems. By shedding more light on how the characteristics of socio-technical systems affect policy interventions, our framework represents a first step towards more closely integrating the literature on innovation systems with the work on policy learning.
    Research Policy 01/2014; 43(8):1422-1441. · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Battery storage is generally considered an effective means for reducing the intermittency of electricity generated by solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. However, currently it remains unclear when and under which conditions battery storage can be profitably operated in residential PV systems without policy support. Based on a review of previous studies that have examined the economics of integrated PV-battery systems, in this paper we devise a simulation model that investigates the economic viability of battery storage for residential PV in Germany under eight different electricity price scenarios from 2013 to 2022. In contrast to previous forward-looking studies, we assume that no premium is paid for solar photovoltaic power and/or self-consumed electricity. Additionally, we run the model with a large number of different PV and storage capacities to determine the economically optimal configuration in terms of system size. We find that already in 2013 investments in storage solutions were economically viable for small PV systems. Given the assumptions of our model, the optimal size of both residential PV systems and battery storage rises significantly in the future. Higher electricity retail prices, lower electricity wholesale prices or limited access to the electricity wholesale market add to the profitability of storage. We conclude that additional policy incentives to foster investments in battery storage for residential PV in Germany will only be necessary in the short run. At the same time, the impending profitability of integrated PV-storage systems is likely to further spur the ongoing trend toward distributed electricity generation with major implications for the electricity sector.
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 07/2014; 39:1101-1118. · 5.63 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
166 Downloads
Available from
May 19, 2014