Article

Сопоставление результатов определения карбонатной системы и общей щелочности морской воды по данным различных аналитических методов

Морской гидрофизический журнал 01/2011;
Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: S. K. Konovalov, Aug 08, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
154 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This Guide contains the most up-to-date information available on the chemistry of CO 2 in sea water and the methodology of determining carbon system parameters, and is an attempt to serve as a clear and unambiguous set of instructions to investigators who are setting up to analyze these parameters in sea water.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The chemistry of surface ocean is dominated by the uptake of CO2 into phytoplankton. This review demonstrates the chemical complexity of the oceanic CO2 cycle but documents the physical and analytical chemistry of the CO2 system and how the ocean CO2 cycle has been perturbed by fossil fuel burning. Topics covered include the thermodynamics of the carbonate system in natural waters, methods used to measure carbonate parameters, modeling the ionic interactions for the carbonate system, distribution of carbonate species in the oceans, fossil fuel CO2 input to the oceans, biological effects of increasing levels of partial pressure of CO2 and sequestering CO2 in the oceans.
    Chemical Reviews 03/2007; 107(2):308-41. DOI:10.1021/cr0503557 · 45.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This work compares the classic Chen and Millero [1979] approach for estimating anthropogenic CO2 from ocean carbon measurements with the more recent DeltaC* technique used by Sabine et al. [1999] to estimate anthropogenic CO2 concentrations in the Indian Ocean. Application of the Chen technique to the WOCE/JGOFS Indian Ocean data set gives a total anthropogenic CO2 inventory that is essentially the same as the DeltaC* inventory, but there are substantial differences in the distributions within the water column. Some of these differences result from details of the application of the techniques such as the choice of which equation to use for the preformed alkalinity concentration or the choice of stoichiometric ratio to use for the biological correction. More significant differences, however, result from two fundamental differences in the techniques. One fundamental difference between the two techniques is that changes in the properties of the subsurface waters are referenced to a single deep water value in the Chen approach instead of the multiple reference points from the isopycnal analysis used in the DeltaC* approach. The second fundamental difference is in the estimation of the preindustrial TCO2 distribution. Many of the differences examined have counteracting effects that may result in a total anthropogenic CO2 inventory that is similar for the two techniques. However, this similarity does not imply that both approaches are right. Comparison with global carbon models and other measurement-based techniques do not clearly demonstrate that one technique is better than another. However, given the additional constraints of the transient tracers and the isopycnal analysis, we believe that the DeltaC* technique provides a more robust estimate.
    03/2001; 15:31-42. DOI:10.1029/2000GB001258