Article

Considerations for Initial Dosing of Botulinum Toxin in Treatment of Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.72). 03/2013; 148(6). DOI: 10.1177/0194599813484685
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Objectives
To assess the effect on voice improvement and duration of breathiness based on initial dose of onabotulinum toxin A (BTX-A) in the management of adductor spasmodic dysphonia (SD) and to compare voice outcomes for initial bilaterally injected doses of 1.25 units (group A) vs 2.5 units (group B) of BTX-A.Study DesignCase series with chart review of patients with adductor SD treated at a tertiary care facility from 1990 to 2011.SettingAcademic subspecialty laryngology practice.Methods
Demographic data (age and sex), voice rating, duration of voice improvement, and breathiness were evaluated and compared between groups A and B using the Student t test and χ(2) analysis.ResultsOf 478 patients identified, 305 (223 in group A, 82 in group B) patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 56.2 years in group A and 57.4 years in group B (P = .5). The female to male ratio was 2.91 for group A vs 3.56 for group B (P = .61). Good voice outcomes (grade 3 or 4) were reported by 91% of group A patients vs 94% of group B (P = .75). The average duration of voice improvement was 99.7 days for group A and 108.3 days for group B (P = .54). The average duration of breathiness was 10.88 days for group A vs 15.42 days for group B (P = .02).Conclusion
Patients injected with 1.25 units bilaterally had a statistically significant shorter duration of breathiness without a statistically significant difference in clinical effectiveness or voice outcome. It is therefore recommended that a relatively low initial BTX-A dose be used with subsequent titration to achieve improved voice outcomes.

0 Followers
 · 
53 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Many patients with spasmodic dysphonia (SD) see consistent effects from botulinum toxin (BTX) injections of the same dose, whereas others require dosage changes over time. We sought to determine whether demographics (age and gender) or environmental factors (smoking) affect the long-term stability of BTX dosing in these patients. Study Design Retrospective review. Methods Charts of all patients undergoing BTX injection for adductor SD were reviewed. Dosage change, defined as whether there was any difference in total dosage used between two beneficial injections, was used as a measure of dosing stability. Beneficial injections were indicated by a voice rating score of at least three of four and any non-zero duration of improved voice. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, gender, smoking status, or duration of treatment correlated with odds of having a dosage change. Results A total of 211 patients were ultimately included. Age, gender, and smoking status were all found to have no correlative effect on dosing stability. The only factor that was predictive of dose stability was the number of previous beneficial injections, as every additional injection led to decreased odds of a change in dosage for the next injection (odds ratio = 0.964; 95% confidence interval = 0.947–0.981). Conclusions Dosage of BTX injections for long-term treatment of SD has a significant propensity to remain stable over time. Factors such as age, gender, and smoking status do not appear to influence the dosage stability. These findings should allow for better patient counseling regarding expectations for their long-term treatment.
    Journal of Voice 09/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.08.011 · 0.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Botulinum toxin (BT) used for dystonia and spasticity is dosed according to the number of target muscles and the severity of their muscle hyperactivities. With this no other drug is used in a broader dose range than BT. The upper end of this range, however, still needs to be explored. We wanted to do this by a prospective non-interventional study comparing a randomly selected group of dystonia and spasticity patients receiving incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(®)) high-dose therapy (HD group, n = 100, single dose ≥400 MU) to a control group receiving incobotulinumtoxinA regular-dose therapy (RD group, n = 30, single dose ≤200 MU). At the measurement point all patients were evaluated for systemic BT toxicity, i.e. systemic motor impairment or systemic autonomic dysfunction. HD group patients (56.1 ± 13.8 years, 46 dystonia, 54 spasticity) were treated with Xeomin(®) 570.1 ± 158.9 (min 400, max 1,200) MU during 10.2 ± 7.0 (min 4, max 37) injection series. In dystonia patients the number of target muscles was 46 and the dose per target muscle 56.4 ± 19.1 MU, in spasticity patients 35 and 114.9 ± 67.1 MU. HD and RD group patients reported 58 occurrences of items on the systemic toxicity questionnaire. Generalised weakness, being bedridden, feeling of residual urine and constipation were caused by the underlying tetra- or paraparesis, blurred vision by presbyopia. Dysphagia and dryness of eye were local BT adverse effects. Neurologic examination, serum chemistry and full blood count did not indicate any systemic adverse effects. Elevated serum levels for creatine kinase/MB, creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase were most likely iatrogenic artefacts. None of the patients developed antibody-induced therapy failure. Xeomin(®) can be used safely in doses ≥400 MU and up to 1,200 MU without detectable systemic toxicity. This allows expanding the use of BT therapy to patients with more widespread and more severe muscle hyperactivity conditions. Further studies-carefully designed and rigorously monitored-are necessary to explore the threshold dose for clinically detectable systemic toxicity.
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 07/2014; 122(2). DOI:10.1007/s00702-014-1252-9
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the demographics of spasmodic dysphonia in the Indian population and to analyse the optimum dose titration of botulinum toxin type A in this group. A comparative analysis with international studies was also performed. Method: The study involved a retrospective analysis and audit of botulinum toxin type A dose titration in spasmodic dysphonia patients who visited our voice clinic between January 2005 and January 2012. Results: The average total therapeutic dose required for patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia was 4.2 U per patient per vocal fold (total 8.4 U per patient), and for patients with abductor spasmodic dysphonia, it was 4.6 U per patient. Conclusion: Our audit revealed that 80 per cent of the spasmodic dysphonia patients were male, which contrasts dramatically with international studies, wherein around 80 per cent of spasmodic dysphonia patients were female. Our study also revealed a higher dose titration of botulinum toxin for the Indian spasmodic dysphonia population in both adductor and abductor spasmodic dysphonia cases.
    The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 07/2014; 128(07):1-5. DOI:10.1017/S002221511400142X · 0.70 Impact Factor