Article

Advances in tuberculosis diagnostics: the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and future prospects for a point-of-care test.

Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
The Lancet Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 19.45). 03/2013; DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70008-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Rapid progress has been made in the development of new diagnostic assays for tuberculosis in recent years. New technologies have been developed and assessed, and are now being implemented. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay, which enables simultaneous detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampicin (RIF) resistance, was endorsed by WHO in December, 2010. This assay was specifically recommended for use as the initial diagnostic test for suspected drug-resistant or HIV-associated pulmonary tuberculosis. By June, 2012, two-thirds of countries with a high tuberculosis burden and half of countries with a high multidrug-resistant tuberculosis burden had incorporated the assay into their national tuberculosis programme guidelines. Although the development of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay is undoubtedly a landmark event, clinical and programmatic effects and cost-effectiveness remain to be defined. We review the rapidly growing body of scientific literature and discuss the advantages and challenges of using the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in areas where tuberculosis is endemic. We also review other prospects within the developmental pipeline. A rapid, accurate point-of-care diagnostic test that is affordable and can be readily implemented is urgently needed. Investment in the tuberculosis diagnostics pipeline should remain a major priority for funders and researchers.

3 Bookmarks
 · 
274 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genomics research has enabled crucial insights into the adaptive evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as an obligate human pathogen. Here, we highlight major recent advances and evaluate the potential for genomics approaches to inform tuberculosis control efforts in high-burden settings.
    Genome Biology 11/2014; 15(11):514. · 10.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Herein, we describe synthesis and antitubercular evaluation of novel-substituted 1,2,3-triazolylmethyl carbazoles rationally designed by incorporating two pharmacophoric heterocycles, viz. carbazole and triazole in one molecular frame. The new compounds 4a–z and 4aa–ac were obtained in very good yields using copper-catalysed Huisgen [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of 9-propynyl-9H-carbazole (2) with various aryl/alkyl azides 3a–z and 3aa–ac. Evaluation of all 29 new analogues for in vitro antimycobacterial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC 27294) resulted two compounds 4x and 4z (MIC: 6.25 μg/mL) as most promising antitubercular agents with low cytotoxicity.
    Medicinal Chemistry Research 03/2015; 24(3). · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Although the evidence base regarding the use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) when testing respiratory samples is well established, the evidence base for its diagnostic accuracy for extrapulmonary and sputum-scarce pulmonary TB when testing non-respiratory samples is less clearly defined.MethodsA systematic literature search of 7 electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, BIOSIS, Global Health Database, Scopus and Cochrane Database) was conducted to identify studies of the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert assay when testing non-respiratory samples compared with a culture-based reference standard. Data were extracted and study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated on a per-sample basis, stratified by sample type and smear microscopy status and summarised using forest plots. Pooled estimates were calculated for groups with sufficient data.ResultsTwenty-seven studies with a total of 6,026 non-respiratory samples were included. Among the 23 studies comparing Xpert and culture done on the same samples, sensitivity was very heterogeneous with a median sensitivity of 0.83 (IQR, 0.68¿0.94) whereas specificities were typically very high (median, 0.98; IQR, 0.89¿1.00). The pooled summary estimates of sensitivity when testing smear-positive and smear-negative samples were 0.95 (95% CI 0.91¿1.00) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.60-0.80), respectively. Pooled summary estimates of sensitivity varied substantially between sample types: lymph node tissue, 0.96 (95%CI, 0.72-0.99); tissue samples of all types, 0.88 (95%CI, 0.76¿0.94); pleural fluid, 0.34 (95%CI, 0.24¿0.44); gastric aspirates for diagnosis of sputum-scarce pulmonary TB, 0.78 (IQR, 0.68 ¿ 0.85). Median sensitivities when testing cerebrospinal fluid and non-pleural serous fluid samples were 0.85 (IQR, 0.75-1.00) and 0.67 (IQR, 0.00-1.00), respectively.Conclusion Xpert detects with high specificity the vast majority of EPTB cases with smear-positive non-respiratory samples and approximately two-thirds of those with smear-negative samples. Xpert is a useful rule-in diagnostic test for EPTB, especially when testing cerebrospinal fluid and tissue samples. In addition, it has a high sensitivity for detecting pulmonary TB when using gastric aspirate samples. These findings support recent WHO guidelines regarding the use of Xpert for TB diagnosis from non-respiratory samples.
    BMC Infectious Diseases 12/2014; 14(1):3847. · 2.56 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
248 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014