Article

Meniscus Body Position, Size, and Shape in Persons With and Persons Without Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis: Quantitative Analyses of Knee Magnetic Resonance Images From the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Institute of Anatomy and Musculoskeletal Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. .
Arthritis & Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 7.87). 07/2013; 65(7). DOI: 10.1002/art.37947
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Objective
To quantitatively evaluate the position, size, and shape of the menisci in subjects with radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared to subjects without OA, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods
We studied the right knees of 39 Osteoarthritis Initiative participants (24 women and 15 men with a mean age of 59.6 +/- 8.7 years) with medial compartment radiographic tibiofemoral OA (Kellgren/Lawrence grade of 2 or 3). Subjects were matched individually for age, sex, and height to controls without knee OA and without risk factors for knee OA. The right knees of the controls were used as references. One observer performed manual segmentation of the tibial plateau and the medial and lateral meniscus based on a coronally reconstructed double-echo steady-state sequence with water excitation, focusing on 5 central 3T MRIs. ResultsIn OA knees, there was less meniscal coverage of the medial tibial plateau (435 mm(2) versus 515 mm(2); P = 0.0004), the medial meniscus body showed more extrusion (2.64 mm versus 0.53 mm; P < 0.0001), and the peripheral margin had a more convex shape, i.e., bulged more (mean 0.61 mm versus 0.27 mm; P < 0.0001). The thickness or volume of the medial meniscus body of OA knees did not differ substantially from reference knees. In contrast, in OA knees the lateral meniscus body had a larger volume (mean 266 mm(3) versus 224 mm(3); P = 0.0005) and extruded more (mean 1.16 mm versus -1.01 mm; P < 0.0001), and the external margin bulged more (mean 0.53 mm versus 0.35 mm; P < 0.0001), than in reference knees. Conclusion
Our findings indicate altered meniscal position and shape (i.e., more bulging) in both compartments in medial compartment knee OA. These changes may be important features of OA pathogenesis and/or disease consequences.

1 Follower
 · 
123 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To establish a novel method of quantifying meniscal deformation using loaded MRI. More specifically, the goals were to evaluate the (1) accuracy, (2) inter-rater reliability, (3) intra-rater reliability, and (4) scan-rescan reliability. The secondary purpose of this experiment was to evaluate group differences in meniscal deformation in participants with and without radiographic knee OA. Materials and methods Weight-bearing 3-T MRIs of the knee in full extension and 30° of flexion were processed to create 3D models of meniscal deformation. Accuracy was assessed using a custom-designed phantom. Twenty-one participants either with or without signs of OA were evaluated, and another six participants (14 knees, one subject was scanned twice) underwent repeated imaging to assess scan-rescan reproducibility. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), root-mean squared error (RMSE), and root-mean-square percent coefficient-of-variation (RMS%CV) analyses were performed. Exploratory comparisons were made between those with and without OA to evaluate potential group differences. Results All variables were found to be accurate with RMSE ranging from 0.08 to 0.35 mm and 5.99 to 14.63 mm2. Reproducibility of peak anterior-posterior meniscal deformation was excellent (ICC > 0.821; p p = 0.039) and lateral meniscus (p = 0.015), and smaller flexed medial meniscus outer area (p = 0.048) when compared to controls. Conclusions MRI-based variables of meniscus deformation were found to be valid in participants with and without OA. Significant differences were found between those with and without radiographic OA; further study is warranted.
    Skeletal Radiology 01/2015; 44(1):125-135. DOI:10.1007/s00256-014-2022-3 · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the incidence and clinical significance of postoperative meniscus transplant extrusion. A systematic search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane online databases. Inclusionary criteria were English language, clinical trials of meniscus transplantation published from 1984 to 2014, and meniscus extrusion measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-three studies were included, in which 814 menisci were implanted into 803 patients. MRIs were obtained from 2 days to 10 years postoperatively. Eighteen studies used fresh-frozen meniscus transplants implanted with bone (n = 612) or suture fixation (n = 116); four studies, cryopreserved transplants; and one, irradiated transplants. Three measurements assessed extrusion: absolute millimeters of extrusion (0-8.8 mm), relative percentage of extrusion (0-100 %), and the percent of transplants that were extruded (0-100 %). Relationships between transplant extrusion and clinical rating scales, joint space narrowing on standing radiographs, and arthrosis progression were inconclusive. Non-anatomic placement of lateral meniscus transplants and suture fixation of medial and lateral transplants were associated with greater extrusion in two studies. Inconsistencies among studies prevent conclusions regarding the incidence and clinical significance of meniscus transplant extrusion. Even so, the short- to mid-term results were encouraging for knee function with daily activities and low rates of failure requiring transplant removal. A postoperative MRI showing more than 3-mm extrusion occurring in some studies suggested technique and/or implant sizing problems that required correction. Future studies should report absolute transplant extrusion, relative percent of extrusion, percent of transplant within the tibiofemoral compartment, and the percent of transplants that are extruded. IV.
    Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 09/2014; 23(1). DOI:10.1007/s00167-014-3329-2 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The aim of this review is to describe imaging techniques for evaluation of non-osteochondral structures such as the synovium, menisci in the knee, labrum in the hip, ligaments and muscles and to review the literature from recent clinical and epidemiological studies of OA. Methods: This is a non-systematic narrative review of published literature on imaging of non-osteochondral tissues in OA. PubMed and MEDLINE search for articles published up to 2014, using the keywords osteoarthritis, synovitis, meniscus, labrum, ligaments, plica, muscles, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography (PET). Results: Published literature showed imaging of non-osteochondral tissues in OA relies primarily on MRI and ultrasound. The use of semiquantitative and quantitative imaging biomarkers of non-osteochondral tissues in clinical and epidemiological OA studies is reported. We highlight studies that have compared both imaging methodologies directly, and those that have established a relationship between imaging biomarkers and clinical outcomes. We provide recommendations as to which imaging protocols should be used to assess disease-specific changes regarding synovium, meniscus in the knee, labrum in the hip, and ligaments, and highlight potential pitfalls in their usage. Conclusion: MRI and ultrasound are currently the most useful imaging modalities for evaluation of non-osteochondral tissues in OA. MRI evaluation of any tissue needs to be performed using appropriate MR pulse sequences. Ultrasound may be particularly useful for evaluation of small joints of the hand. Nuclear medicine and CT play a limited role in imaging of non-osteochondral tissues in OA.
    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 10/2014; 22(10):1590-1605. DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2014.05.001 · 4.66 Impact Factor