Article

Asymptomatic Upper Arm Mass in a 37-year-old Woman.

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 110 SW 12th Street, Apt 1402, Miami, FL, 33130, USA, .
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.79). 03/2013; DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2877-y
Source: PubMed
0 Bookmarks
 · 
68 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP), or Nora's lesion, is an unusual surface-based lesion of bone found most commonly in the hands and feet. In the original description of the lesion and in all publications that followed, one of the key imaging characteristics used to define this entity was the lack of cortico-medullary continuity with the underlying bone. The authors present 4 unique cases of pathologically proven BPOP in which cortico-medullary continuity with the underlying bone was demonstrated on imaging. It is believed that florid reactive periostitis, BPOP and turret osteochondroma may reflect points along the same continuum with trauma the likely inciting event. The authors suggest that, given this continuum, it may be possible to have BPOP lesions demonstrating overlapping imaging features with osteochondroma. If this is the case, strict adherence to the standard imaging criterion of lack of continuity between the lesion and the underlying bone may lead to misdiagnosis of these unusual cases of BPOP as osteochondromas.
    Skeletal Radiology 10/2007; 36(9):829-34. · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To report on the imaging evolution of florid reactive periostitis (FRP) and bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP) of the phalanges of the hands from prospective diagnosis to operation and on postsurgical outcome. Three patients (2 female, 1 male; age range 11-34 years) presented with a swollen digit of the hand. Following presumptive radiographic diagnosis of FRP, they were closely observed both clinically and radiographically until operation. All three patients had radiographs of the involved digit, and one patient had an MR imaging examination. The interval between presumptive diagnosis and operation ranged from 2 to 8 months. Following operation, the patients have been clinically followed for 9-13 months (mean 10 months). In each of the patients, maturing of periosteal reaction without bone destruction was observed within 1-2 weeks of the presumptive diagnosis of FRP. Periosteal reaction was initially minimal in relation to the extent of soft tissue swelling and subsequently became more florid. In one patient, the lesion ossified, became adherent to the phalanx, and had an "osteochondromatous" appearance. In another patient, periosteal reaction was seen on both sides of the phalanx with an intact phalanx. In the sole patient who had MR imaging, edema was seen in the phalanx distal to the symptomatic site and the metacarpal proximal to the symptomatic site. Close clinical and radiographic correlation permits an accurate pre-biopsy diagnosis of FRP. The first follow-up radiograph taken within 2 weeks usually provides re-assurance of the accuracy of the diagnosis. FRP may progress to BPOP. Arbitrary antibiotic treatment can be avoided, and a planned surgical approach can be adopted.
    Skeletal Radiology 05/2001; 30(4):192-8. · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation and periosteal chondroma are rare, benign, bony lesions that may present in the hand. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation was first reported in the literature by Nora in 1983, and periosteal chondroma was first reported by Lichtenstein in 1952. This report provides a unique side-by-side comparison of these lesions, illustrating each with a clinical vignette. This report, coupled with a thorough review of the literature, serves to demonstrate that the history and physical exam characteristics, as well as the radiographic and gross appearances, are insufficient to differentiate between the two lesions. Histopathologic examination is required to confirm the diagnosis.
    The Journal Of Hand Surgery 01/2007; 32(6):893-8. · 1.57 Impact Factor