Hospital Fall Prevention: A Systematic Review of Implementation, Components, Adherence, and Effectiveness

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.57). 03/2013; 61(4). DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12169
Source: PubMed


To systematically document the implementation, components, comparators, adherence, and effectiveness of published fall prevention approaches in U.S. acute care hospitals.
Systematic review. Studies were identified through existing reviews, searching five electronic databases, screening reference lists, and contacting topic experts for studies published through August 2011.
U.S. acute care hospitals.
Studies reporting in-hospital falls for intervention groups and concurrent (e.g., controlled trials) or historic comparators (e.g., before–after studies).
Fall prevention interventions.
Incidence rate ratios (IRR, ratio of fall rate postintervention or treatment group to the fall rate preintervention or control group) and ratings of study details.
Fifty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Implementation strategies were sparsely documented (17% not at all) and included staff education, establishing committees, seeking leadership support, and occasionally continuous quality improvement techniques. Most interventions (81%) included multiple components (e.g., risk assessments (often not validated), visual risk alerts, patient education, care rounds, bed-exit alarms, and postfall evaluations). Fifty-four percent did not report on fall prevention measures applied in the comparison group, and 39% neither reported fidelity data nor described adherence strategies such as regular audits and feedback to ensure completion of care processes. Only 45% of concurrent and 15% of historic control studies reported sufficient data to compare fall rates. The pooled postintervention incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.77 (95% confidence interval = 0.52–1.12, P = .17; eight studies; I2: 94%). Meta-regressions showed no systematic association between implementation intensity, intervention complexity, comparator information, or adherence levels and IRR.
Promising approaches exist, but better reporting of outcomes, implementation, adherence, intervention components, and comparison group information is necessary to establish evidence on how hospitals can successfully prevent falls.

Download full-text


Available from: Susanne Hempel,
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to examine nursing specialty certification trends by Magnet® status and unit type. Research exploring organizational and unit attributes associated with higher specialty certification rates is timely given the beginning evidence that certification is associated with lower patient adverse events. The sample included 6047 units in 1249 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators hospitals. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to predict growth in percentage of specialty-certified RNs within each unit type and Magnet status. Data (Bayesian Information Criteria = 224 583.30) demonstrated significant growth in specialty certification rates over time (P < .0001). Magnet-designated organizations had significantly different starting certification rates (P = .0002) and rates of change (P = .0002). Unit types also had significantly different starting certification rates (P < .0001) and different rates of change (P < .0001). Magnet recognition is associated with increases in specialty certification rates. Certification rates have risen faster in unit types such as pediatric critical care than in unit types such as adult step-down and adult surgical.
    The Journal of nursing administration 12/2012; 42(12):567-573. DOI:10.1097/NNA.0b013e318274b581 · 1.27 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Falls are a frequent, dreaded occurrence among inpatients and often lead to serious health consequences and substantial economic burden. Inpatient falls are a core measure of patient safety and quality care. This review guides hospital practitioners in the assessment and intervention of the individual patient and outlines the key steps required for the development of a hospital-wide fall prevention program.
    Hospital Medicine Clinics 01/2013; 3(2). DOI:10.1016/j.ehmc.2013.11.005
  • Source

    Advances in Anesthesia 01/2013; 31(1):119–136. DOI:10.1016/j.aan.2013.08.006
Show more