Impact of proton pump inhibitor therapy on the efficacy of clopidogrel in the CAPRIE and CREDO trials

University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.
Journal of the American Heart Association (Impact Factor: 4.31). 12/2013; 2(1):e004564. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.112.004564
Source: PubMed


Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may interfere with the metabolic activation of clopidogrel via inhibition of cytochrome P450 2C19, but the clinical implications remain unclear.
The impact of PPI use on the 1-year primary end point (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], or vascular death) in the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) trial and the 28-day (all-cause death, MI, or urgent target vessel revascularization) and 1-year (all-cause death, MI, or stroke) primary end points in the Clopidogrel for Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial were examined. Clopidogrel appeared to elevate risk for the primary end point in CAPRIE among PPI users (estimated hazard ratio [EHR] 2.66, 95% CI 0.94 to 7.50) while lowering it for non-PPI users (EHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.99, interaction P=0.047). Moreover, PPI use was associated with worse outcomes in patients receiving clopidogrel (EHR 2.39, 95% CI 1.74 to 3.28) but not aspirin (EHR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.57, interaction P=0.001). Clopidogrel did not significantly alter risk for the 1-year primary end point in CREDO among PPI users (EHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.40) while lowering it for non-PPI users (EHR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.98, interaction P=0.682). Also, PPI use was associated with worse outcomes in both patients receiving clopidogrel (EHR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.64) and those receiving placebo (EHR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.30, interaction P=0.811).
In CREDO, the efficacy of clopidogrel was not significantly affected by PPI use. However, in CAPRIE, clopidogrel was beneficial to non-PPI users while apparently harmful to PPI users. Whether this negative interaction is clinically important for patients receiving clopidogrel without aspirin needs further study.

Download full-text


Available from: Steven P Dunn, Oct 06, 2015
33 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is highly effective in the treatment of severe coronary artery disease. Antiplatelet therapy is a critical component of the medical management of patients following CABG. Patient idiosyncrasies in responsiveness to antiplatelet agents, however, lead to variable suppression of platelet aggregation. This problem is underscored by inconsistent findings from the different laboratory instruments used to document antiplatelet drug responsiveness and its uncertain clinical impact. The laboratory results reveal a spectrum of platelet inhibition effects. The cutoff values discriminating between “resistance” and “response” to antiplatelet therapy often rely solely on definition. It is therefore not surprising that regular testing for antiplatelet therapy response has neither been routinely instituted in a wider clinical arena nor is there unequivocal evidence to support it. The purpose of this review is to offer insight into the incidence and clinical impact of antiplatelet therapy resistance in patients undergoing surgical myocardial revascularization.
    Drug Development Research 11/2013; 74(7). DOI:10.1002/ddr.21107 · 0.77 Impact Factor
  • The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 12/2013; 147(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.008 · 4.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Barrett's esophagus, the condition in which metaplastic columnar epithelium that predisposes to cancer development replaces the squamous epithelium that normally lines the distal esophagus, is a complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Metaplasia is a potentially reversible condition, and partial regression of Barrett's metaplasia has been documented with effective medical or surgical therapy for GERD. The important issue for patient management is not whether antireflux treatment causes Barrett's esophagus to regress, but rather whether antireflux therapy prevents cancer in Barrett's esophagus. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) would be expected to prevent this cancer because they heal reflux esophagitis, reduce exposure to a potential carcinogen (acid), and might prevent acid-induced proliferation and cancer-promoting cytokine secretion by esophageal epithelial cells. Furthermore, observational studies have shown that PPI use is associated with a decreased incidence of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. In theory, successful antireflux surgery, which eliminates the reflux of both acid and bile, should be better for cancer prevention than medical therapy, which only decreases the reflux of acid. However, high-quality studies show no significant difference in cancer incidence between medically and surgically treated patients with GERD and Barrett's esophagus. Furthermore, for individual patients with nondysplastic Barrett's metaplasia, the cancer risk is so small and the number needed to treat for cancer prevention with surgery so large, that it does not matter whether or not surgery provides a tiny margin of extra protection against cancer beyond that provided by medical therapy. The cost and risks of the operation overwhelm any small, additional cancer protective benefit. Antireflux surgery is very effective at controlling the endoscopic signs and symptoms of GERD, but the operation should not be recommended to patients solely with the rationale that it protects against cancer better than medical therapy. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    Digestive Diseases 03/2014; 32(1-2):156-63. DOI:10.1159/000357184 · 2.18 Impact Factor
Show more