Familiarity Perception Call Elicited under Restricted Sensory Cues in Peer-Social Interactions of the Domestic Chick

National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, NCNP, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 03/2013; 8(3):e58847. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058847
Source: PubMed


Social cognitive mechanisms are central to understanding developmental abnormalities, such as autistic spectrum disorder. Peer relations besides parent-infant or pair-bonding interactions are pivotal social relationships that are especially well developed in humans. Cognition of familiarity forms the basis of peer socialization. Domestic chick (Gallus gallus) studies have contributed to our understanding of the developmental process in sensory-motor cognition but many processes remain unknown. In this report, we used chicks, as they are precocial birds, and we could therefore focus on peer interaction without having to consider parenting. The subject chick behavior towards familiar and unfamiliar reference peers was video-recorded, where the subject and the reference were separated by either an opaque or transparent wall. Spectrogram and behavior correlation analyses based on principal component analysis, revealed that chicks elicited an intermediate contact call and a morphologically different distress call, more frequently towards familiar versus unfamiliar chicks in acoustic only conditions. When both visual and acoustic cues were present, subject chicks exhibited approaching and floor pecking behavior, while eliciting joyful (pleasant) calls, irrespective of whether reference peers were familiar or unfamiliar. Our result showed that chicks recognized familiarity using acoustic cues and expressed cognition through modified distress calls. These finding suggests that peer affiliation may be established by acoustic recognition, independent of visual face recognition, and that eventually, both forms of recognition are integrated, with modulation of acoustic recognition.

Download full-text


Available from: Genta Karino,
  • Source
    • "From these, we attempted to apply a heterogeneous information processing in the way of a multivariate correlation analysis that we have evaluated for neuropsychiatry and developmental brain science among human and model animal researches [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]. The cross-species behavioral study has revealed the common process of sensory-motor and emotional development between human infants and animals [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] and led to our understanding of multi-layered neuropsychological networks especially in affective and cognitive development [20] [21] [22] [23]. Bottom-up and top-down information flowing in the brain networks may express the mutually interrelated physiological and behavioral outputs in social context and developmental stage, which is possibly well captured by the multi-domain analysis. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multidimensional diagnosis plays a central role in infant developmental care, which leads to the prediction of future disabilities. Information consolidated from objective and subjective, early and late, central and peripheral data may reveal neuro-pathological mechanisms and realize earlier and more precise preventive intervention. In the current study, we retrospectively searched correlating factors to the following neurological and behavioral development of ‘Head Control’ and ‘Roll Over’ using multivariate correlation analysis of different diagnostic domains over age, subject/object information of the patients who were previously admitted in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and could be developmentally followed up in our outpatient clinic. Based on the hematologic and biochemical data, MRI brain anatomy during NICU hospitalization, we characterized all the acquired data distribution from 31 infants with either ‘appeared neurologically normal (ANN, n = 21)’ or ‘appeared neurologically abnormal (ANA, n = 10)’ pro tempore, with a physician's clinical judgment before discharge. Besides single factor comparisons between ANN and ANA, we examined their development difference by using the multidimensional information processing, principal component analysis (PCA). The diagnostic predictors of neuro-behavioral development were selected by regression analysis with variable selection. It resulted that hematological and brain anatomical factors seemed correlated to both ‘Head Control’ and ‘Roll Over’. This report suggested certain possibility of the cross-domain translational approach between subjective and objective developmental information through multivariate analyses, with candidate markers preliminarily to be evaluated in further studies.
    Behavioural Brain Research 06/2014; 276. DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2014.05.054 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "We recently characterized the chick call behaviour in terms of emotional valence and there exists an consensus about J-call as attracting other chicks to food and d-call as emitted under stressful condition either from physiological or social origin, while dj-call is transitional from d-call to J-call23. Pecking behaviour has also emotional valence since the object of pecking suggests the motivational state of chicks, e.g., floor pecking is associated with food pecking behaviour and J-call23. These data-driven correlation structures (clusters of behaviour vectors) described the socio-emotional features of each group. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Attachment formation is the most pivotal factor for humans and animals in the growth and development of social relationships. However, the developmental processes of attachment formation mediated by sensory-motor, emotional, and cognitive integration remain obscure. Here we developed an animal model to understand the types of social interactions that lead to peer-social attachment formation. We found that the social interaction in a sensitive period was essential to stabilise or overwrite the initially imprinted peer affiliation state and that synchronised behaviour with others based on common motivations could be a driver of peer social attachment formation. Furthermore, feeding experience with supplementation of ubiquinol conferred peer social attachment formation even after the sensitive period. Surprisingly, the experience of feeding beyond the cage window was also effective to reduce the required amount ubiquinol, suggesting that peri-personal space modulation may affect socio-emotional cognition and there by lead to attachment formation.
    Scientific Reports 08/2013; 3:2503. DOI:10.1038/srep02503 · 5.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Attachment formation is crucial for social animals to survive in natural environments. Predisposition and imprinting mechanisms have been well documented as a process of con-specific affiliation development. However, it is unclear how neonatal stage attachment formation leads to juvenile peer sociality. Here we have developed an animal model (Gallus gallus domesticus) and a method of quantitative behavioral analysis, to study the developmental trajectory from postnatal day (P) 3 through to P21. Domestic chicks were raised in either group or isolated conditions and we focused on social behavior during a two-minute meeting context with unfamiliar group peers at P3, 7, 13, 16, and 21. Results showed that relative to isolated chicks, group reared chicks were more active behaviorally, when facing peers at P3 and that this activity declined slightly over development, up to P13. Isolated chicks that had not met any animals except humans, exhibited a major change in social behavior around P7, in particular, with increasing activity (head moving velocity and rotation velocity) and distress calls. This modulation disappeared after P13, suggesting the existence of a sensitive window for behavior towards peers around P7. These findings in isolated chicks suggest the maturation of new neuronal substrates for peer-social emotion and cognition, resulting in a new combination of behavioral modes.
    Neuroscience Letters 05/2013; 547. DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.05.009 · 2.03 Impact Factor
Show more