One year outcomes of initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in acute lung injury patients: prospective follow-up ofthe EDEN randomized trial

Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 16.38). 03/2013; 346:f1532. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f1532
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the effect of initial low energy permissive underfeeding ("trophic feeding") versus full energy enteral feeding ("full feeding") on physical function and secondary outcomes in patients with acute lung injury.
Prospective longitudinal follow-up evaluation of the NHLBI ARDS Clinical Trials Network's EDEN trial
41hospitals in the United States.
525 patients with acute lung injury.
Randomised assignment to trophic or full feeding for up to six days; thereafter, all patients still receiving mechanical ventilation received full feeding.
Blinded assessment of the age and sex adjusted physical function domain of the SF-36 instrument at 12 months after acute lung injury. Secondary outcome measures included survival; physical, psychological, and cognitive functioning; quality of life; and employment status at six and 12 months.
After acute lung injury, patients had substantial physical, psychological, and cognitive impairments, reduced quality of life, and impaired return to work. Initial trophic versus full feeding did not affect mean SF-36 physical function at 12 months (55 (SD 33) v 55 (31), P=0.54), survival to 12 months (65% v 63%, P=0.63), or nearly all of the secondary outcomes.
In survivors of acute lung injury, there was no difference in physical function, survival, or multiple secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 month follow-up after initial trophic or full enteral feeding.
NCT No 00719446.

Download full-text


Available from: Elizabeth Colantuoni, Aug 14, 2014
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction The purpose of this trial was to investigate the effectiveness of an exercise rehabilitation program commencing during intensive care (ICU) admission and continuing into the outpatient setting compared with usual care on physical function and health related quality of life in survivors of ICU. Methods This was a single center assessor blinded randomized trial. One hundred and fifty participants were stratified and randomized to receive usual care or intervention if they were in ICU ≥ 5 days and had no permanent neurological insult. The intervention group received intensive exercises in the ICU, ward and outpatients. Participants were assessed at recruitment, ICU, hospital discharge and 3, 6 and 12 months. Physical function was evaluated using the 6 minute walk test (6MWT) (Primary outcome); timed up and go test and the physical function in intensive care test. Patient-reported outcomes were measured with Short form 36 version 2 (SF36v2) and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument. Data were analysed using mixed models. Results The apriori enrolment was not reached. There were no between group differences in demographic and hospital data, including acuity and length of acute hospital stay (LOS) [APACHE II: 21v19; Hospital LOS: 20v24 days]. No significant differences were found for the primary outcome of 6MWT or any other outcomes at 12months post ICU discharge. However, exploratory analyses showed the rate of change over time and mean between group differences in 6MWT from first assessment were greater in the intervention group. Conclusions Further research examining the trajectory of improvement with rehabilitation is warranted in this population. Trial registration The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12605000776606. Keywords Critical illness, Rehabilitation, Exercise, Physiotherapy, Physical function, Health related quality of life
    Critical Care 01/2013; · 5.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate feasibility of exercise-based rehabilitation delivered after hospital discharge in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). Twenty adult patients, mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours, with ICU-AW diagnosis at ICU discharge were included in a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial receiving a 16-session exercise-based rehabilitation program. Twenty-one patients without ICU-AW participated in a nested observational cohort study. Feasibility, clinical, and patient-centered outcomes were measured at hospital discharge and at 3 months. Intervention feasibility was demonstrated by high adherence and patient acceptability, and absence of adverse events, but this must be offset by the low proportion of enrolment for those screened. The study was underpowered to detect effectiveness of the intervention. The use of manual muscle testing for the diagnosis of ICU-AW lacked robustness as an eligibility criterion and lacked discrimination for identifying rehabilitation requirements. Process evaluation of the trial identified methodological factors, categorized by "population," "intervention," "control group," and "outcome." Important data detailing the design, conduct, and implementation of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of exercise-based rehabilitation for survivors of critical illness after hospital discharge have been reported. Clinical Trials Identifier NCT00976807. Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 01/2013; 40(3):A3617. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.02.002 · 11.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In contrast to other clinical outcomes, long-term cognitive function in critical care survivors has not been deeply studied. In this narrative review, we summarize the existing literature on the prevalence, mechanisms, risk factors, and prediction of cognitive impairment after surviving critical illness. Depending on the exact clinical subgroup, up to 100% of critical care survivors may suffer some degree of long-term cognitive impairment at hospital discharge; in approximately 50%, decrements in cognitive function will persist years later. Although the mechanisms of acquiring this impairment are poorly understood, several risk factors have been identified. Unfortunately, no easy means of predicting long-term cognitive impairment exists. Despite this barrier, research is ongoing to test possible treatments for cognitive impairment. In particular, the potential role of exercise on cognitive recovery is an exciting area of exploration. Opportunities exist to incorporate physical and cognitive rehabilitation strategies across a spectrum of environments (in the ICU, on the hospital ward, and at home, posthospital discharge).
    Critical Care Medicine 01/2013; 41:S81-S98. DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a16946 · 6.15 Impact Factor
Show more