Physical fitness as a predictor of herniated lumbar disc disease - A 33-year follow-up in the Copenhagen male study

The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark. .
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Impact Factor: 1.72). 03/2013; 14(1):86. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-86
Source: PubMed


The role of physical fitness (VO2Max (mlO2*min-1*kg-1)) as a risk factor for herniated lumbar disc disease (HLDD) is unknown. The objective of this study was to examine the association between aerobic (physical) fitness and risk of hospitalisation due to HLDD in a long-term follow up.
The Copenhagen Male Study is a prospective cohort study established in 1970-71. At baseline, 5,249 men answered a questionnaire about their history of back disease, physical and psychosocial working conditions, lifestyle and social class. Height and weight was measured and aerobic capacity (physical fitness) was estimated based on a submaximal bicycle test. Information about hospitalization due to HLDD was obtained from the National Hospital Register covering the period 1977 - 2003. Hazard Ratios (HR) were calculated by Cox's proportional hazard regression model.
Among 3,833 men without history of low back disorders, 64 were hospitalized due to HLDD. The cumulative incidence of HLDD was 1.7% (n=34) among men with low physical fitness (15-32 ml O2*min-1*kg-1), and 1.7% (n=30) among men with high physical fitness (33-78 ml O2*min-1*kg-1). In a final model, adjusted for relevant confounders, the HR (95% CI) for HLDD for those with high physical fitness was 0.88 (0.51-1.50) compared to those with low physical fitness. In the same model, HR for men often exposed to strenuous work compared to those seldom or never exposed to strenuous work was 3.91(1.82-8.38). Also body height was a significant predictor.
Physical fitness is not associated with hospitalisation due to HLDD, and the only modifiable risk factor for hospitalisation due to HLDD seems to be strenuousness at work.

Download full-text


Available from: Andreas Holtermann, Oct 02, 2015
24 Reads
  • Source
    • "Physical capacity such as muscle strength and endurance, flexibility and aerobic fitness has been related to risk of musculoskeletal pain [32-38]. Also low leisure time physical activity has been considered a risk factor for musculoskeletal pain [39], however studies present mixed results, possibly due to inadequate use of objective measurements [34,40]. Therefore, both of these potentially important confounders should be considered and measured objectively in studies of the association between work demands and musculoskeletal pain. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Among blue-collar workers, high physical work demands are generally considered to be the main cause of musculoskeletal pain and work disability. However, current available research on this topic has been criticised for using self-reported data, cross-sectional design, insufficient adjustment for potential confounders, and inadequate follow-up on the recurrent and fluctuating pattern of musculoskeletal pain. Recent technological advances have provided possibilities for objective diurnal field measurements of physical activities and frequent follow-up on musculoskeletal pain.The main aim of this paper is to describe the background, design, methods, limitations and perspectives of the Danish Physical Activity cohort with Objective measurements (DPhacto) investigating the association between objectively measured physical activities capturing work and leisure time and frequent measurements of musculoskeletal pain among blue-collar workers.Methods/design: Approximately 2000 blue-collar workers are invited for the study and asked to respond to a baseline questionnaire, participate in physical tests (i.e. muscle strength, aerobic fitness, back muscle endurance and flexibility), to wear accelerometers and a heart rate monitor for four consecutive days, and finally respond to monthly text messages regarding musculoskeletal pain and quarterly questionnaires regarding the consequences of musculoskeletal pain on work activities, social activities and work ability for a one-year follow-up period. This study will provide novel information on the association between physical activities at work and musculoskeletal pain. The study will provide valid and precise documentation about the relation between physical work activities and musculoskeletal pain and its consequences among blue-collar workers.
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 07/2013; 14(1):213. DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-14-213 · 1.72 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if different types, body positions, and levels of progression of functional coordination exercises can provide sufficiently high levels of muscle activity to improve strength of the neck, shoulder, and trunk muscles. Nine untrained women were familiarized with 7 functional coordination exercises 12 times during 4 weeks before testing. Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was obtained from rectus abdominus, erector spinae, obliquus externus, and trapezius during the exercises with 2-4 levels of progression. Electromyography was normalized to the maximal EMG activity during maximal voluntary contractions, and a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. All recorded muscles reached sufficiently high levels of activity during the coordination exercises for strength gain (>60% of maximal EMG activity). Type of exercise played a significant role for the attained muscle activity. Body position during the exercises was important for the activity of the erector spinae, and level of progression was important for the activity of the trapezius. The findings indicate that depending on type, body position, and level of progression, functional coordination training can be performed with a muscle activity sufficient for strength gain. Functional coordination training may therefore be a good choice for prevention or rehabilitation of musculoskeletal pain or injury in the neck, shoulder, or trunk muscles.
    The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 07/2010; 24(7):1732-9. DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddf6b5 · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • World Neurosurgery 08/2013; 82(1-2). DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.07.101 · 2.88 Impact Factor
Show more