Article

CCL21 is associated with fatal outcomes in chronic heart failure: data from CORONA and GISSI-HF trials

Research Institute for Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
European Journal of Heart Failure (Impact Factor: 6.58). 03/2013; 15(7). DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft031
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT AimsChronic heart failure (HF) is in part characterized by immune activation and inflammation, and factors that regulate lymphocyte trafficking and inflammation may contribute to the progression of this disorder. The homeostatic chemokine CCL21 is a potent regulator of T-cell migration into non-lymphoid tissue and may exert inflammatory properties and influence tissue remodelling. We therefore investigated CCL21 levels and association with fatal outcomes in patients with chronic HF.Methods and resultsPlasma CCL21 was measured at randomization in 1456 patients enrolled in the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in HF (CORONA) and in 1145 from the GISSI-HF trial. Association between CCL21 levels [given below as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1 SD increase] with all-cause (n = 741) or cardiovascular (CV) mortality (n = 576) was evaluated with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for clinical risk factors, C-reactive protein, and NT-proBNP. In multivariable Cox models, CCL21 was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32; P = 0.020) and CV mortality (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.33; P < 0.001). When the two trials were analysed separately, CCL21 had a similar influence on risk prediction. Finally, CCL21 had a modest but significant impact on the discriminatory properties of the model (all-cause mortality, change in Harrell's C-statistic 0.004, P = 0.001; CV mortality, change in C-statistic 0.002, P = 0.002).Conclusion
Circulating CCL21 was associated with all-cause and CV mortality in two large populations of contemporary patients with chronic HF.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Serge Masson, Jul 15, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
149 Views
 · 
32 Downloads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A growing array of biological pathways underpins the syndrome we recognize as heart failure. These include both deleterious pathways promoting its development and progression, as well as compensatory cardioprotective pathways. Components of these pathways can be utilized as biomarkers of this condition to aid diagnosis, prognostication and potentially guide management. As our understanding of the pathophysiology of heart failure deepens further candidate biomarkers are being identified. We provide an overview of the more recently emerging biomarkers displaying potential promise for future clinical use.
    Biomarkers in Medicine 07/2014; 8(6):833-40. DOI:10.2217/bmm.14.51 · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF). In addition to their direct involvement as mediators in the pathogenesis of HF, inflammatory cytokines and related mediators could also be suitable markers for risk stratification and prognostication in HF patients. Many reports have suggested that inflammatory cytokines may predict adverse outcome in these patients. However, most studies have been limited in sample size and lacking full adjustment with the most recent and strongest biochemical predictor such as NT-proBNP and high sensitivity troponins. Furthermore, a number of pre-analytical and analytical aspects of cytokine measurements may limit their use as biomarkers. This review focuses on technical, informative and practical considerations concerning the clinical use of inflammatory cytokines as prognostic biomarkers of HF. We focus on the predictive value of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, the TNF family receptors sTNFR1 and osteoprotegerin, interleukin (IL)-6 and its receptor gp130, the chemokines MCP-1, IL-8, CXCL16 and CCL21 and the pentraxin PTX-3 in larger prospective fully adjusted studies. No single inflammatory cytokine provides sufficient discrimination to justify the transition to everyday clinical use as a prognosticator in HF. However, while subjecting potential new HF markers to rigorous comparisons with "gold-standard" markers, such as NT-proBNP, using receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) and HF risk models, makes sense from a clinical standpoint, it may pose a threat to a broadening of mechanistic insight if the new markers are dismissed solely on account of lower statistical power.
    Clinica Chimica Acta 09/2014; 443. DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2014.09.001 · 2.82 Impact Factor