Article

A systematic review of trastuzumab and lapatinib in the treatment of women with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer.

Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark. Electronic address: .
Cancer Treatment Reviews (Impact Factor: 6.47). 03/2013; DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.01.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer are living still longer and increasingly experiencing brain metastases. Current HER2-targeted therapies have limited potential to cross the blood-brain-barrier. We performed a systematic review to investigate data on HER2-targeting therapies in the treatment of brain metastases in breast cancer. We searched PUBMED for all human studies published 1998-2012 using the following search terms: breast neoplasm/cancer, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/HER2, ErbB2, trastuzumab, lapatinib, brain/cerebral neoplasm/metastases and blood-brain barrier. We identified few and mostly small clinical studies. Study designs were very heterogeneous making comparisons on endpoints difficult. Overall survival for patients treated with trastuzumab varied from 8 to 25months and 5.5 to 11months for patients receiving lapatinib. The majority of studies were retrospective thus possibly biasing data. Only three studies were identified comparing trastuzumab to lapatinib. Conclusively, no solid data exist on how to treat patients with HER2-positive disease and brain metastases. Although continuous HER2-blockade is recommended by international consensus guidelines, it is still not evident which HER2-targeting agent should be preferred when brain metastases occur. The choice of chemotherapy to accompany the blockade is not obvious and we do not know if dual is better than single blockade. Further clinical trials are urgently needed.

1 Follower
 · 
72 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Novel molecularly targeted agents that block the development and metastasis of human brain metastatic breast cancer hold great promise for their translational value. In this study, we constructed a novel targeting composite peptide BRBP1-TAT-KLA comprising of three elements: a brain metastatic breast carcinoma cell (231-BR)-binding peptide BRBP1, a cell penetrating peptide TAT, and a proapoptotic peptide KLA. This composite peptide efficiently internalized in 231-BR cells and consequently induced mitochondrial damage and cellular apoptosis. Exposure of 231-BR cells to BRBP1-TAT-KLA significantly decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis compared with the cells treated with the control peptides. In vivo relevance of these findings was further corroborated in the 231-BR tumor-bearing mice that demonstrated significantly delayed tumor development and metastasis following administration of BRBP1-TAT-KLA compared with those treated with TAT-KLA alone. Interestingly, BRBP1-TAT-KLA inhibited the formation of both large and micro-metastases, while TAT-KLA alone failed to significantly reduce micro-metastases in the breast cancer brain metastasis mice. BRBP1-TAT-KLA selectively homed to the tumors in vivo where it induced cellular apoptosis without significant toxicity on non-tumor tissues. Our findings therefore demonstrated the enhanced antitumor effects of the BRBP1 compound peptide BRBP1-TAT-KLA, providing insights toward development of a potential therapeutic strategy for brain metastatic breast cancer.
    Scientific Reports 01/2015; 5:8029. DOI:10.1038/srep08029 · 5.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metastases to the central nervous system (CNS) are common in several cancer types. For most primary tumors that commonly metastasize to the CNS, molecular biomarker analyses are recommended in the clinical setting for selection of appropriate targeted therapies. Therapeutic efficacy of some of these agents has been documented in patients with brain metastases, and molecular testing of CNS metastases should be considered in the clinical setting. Here, we summarize the clinically relevant biomarker tests that should be considered in neurosurgical specimens based on the current recommendations of the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) or the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for the most relevant primary tumor types: lung cancer (EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangement, BRAF mutations), breast cancer (HER2 amplification, steroid receptor overexpression), melanoma (BRAF mutations), and colorectal cancer (RAS mutations). Furthermore, we discuss emerging therapeutic targets including novel oncogenic alterations (ROS1 rearrangements, FGFR1 amplifications, CMET amplifications, and others) and molecular features of the tumor microenvironment (including immune-checkpoint molecules such as CTLA4 and PD-1/PD-L1). We also discuss the potential role of advanced biomarker tests such as next-generation sequencing and "liquid biopsies" for patients with CNS metastases.
    Acta Neuropathologica 10/2014; DOI:10.1007/s00401-014-1350-7 · 9.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Development of brain metastases (BM) in breast cancer leads to limited survival. The therapeutical options are limited. There are less data about the risk factors and prognostic importance in BM. Objective is to investigate predictors of central nervous system metastases and outcome after diagnosis of BM according to tumor subtype. Based on medical records, 80 consecutive patients with primary non-metastatic operable breast cancer, treated at Department of Gynecology, University of Tübingen, and who developed BM during follow-up, were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological parameters and their prognostic impact were evaluated. A node involvement (40 %), ER/PR negative (53.75 vs. 61.25 %), triple negative (28.75 %) and HER2+ status (40 %) were associated with BM. BM in breast cancer patients lead to a shortened survival. In cerebral metastatic breast cancer patients with HER2-negative and triple-negative, patients had significant shorter survival after detection of BM compared with HER2-positive and non-triple-negative patients (p = 0.001; p = 0.03). Risk of BM varies significantly by subtype. Understanding the biology of metastases can help categorize patients into prognostically useful categories and tailor treatment regimens for individual patients. Prospective clinical trials would be required for evaluating the potential role of screening for asymptomatic BM and of treatment of triple-negative patients.
    Medical Oncology 01/2015; 32(1):400. DOI:10.1007/s12032-014-0400-2 · 2.06 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
23 Downloads
Available from
Nov 17, 2014