Conference Paper

Most popular contents requested by users in different Wikipedia editions

Conference: 4th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development (KEOD)


This paper aims to analyze how the most requested and
contributed contents in Wikipedia may significantly vary depending on the
considered edition. The on-line Encyclopedia has become a prolific research topic,
mainly in aspects related to the assessment of its contents and in its evolution
forecasting. However, very little effort has been devoted to deal with the kind of use
given to Wikipedia by its visitors, either occasional or subscribers. Thus, our work
aims to explore the utilization made of Wikipedia through a classification of the most
requested and contributed contents in some of its editions. This way, we will be in
position of determining which type of contents attracts the highest numbers of visits
and contributions in these editions and which can be a good indicator of the use given
to them by their respective community of users. Apart from the subsequent comparison
purposes, such examination may reveal interesting topics such as the transmission of
tendencies over the different Wikipedia editions, as well as particular user patterns
exhibited by the corresponding communities of users.

Download full-text


Available from: Antonio J. Reinoso, Oct 12, 2015
67 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Wikipedia has millions of articles, many of which receive little at- tention. One group of Wikipedians believes these obscure entries should be removed because they are uninteresting and neglected; these are the deletionists. Other Wikipedians disagree, arguing that this long tail of articles is precisely Wikipedia's advanta ge over other encyclopedias; these are the inclusionists. This paper looks at two overarching questions on the debate between deletionists and inclusionists: (1) What are the implications to the long tai l of the evolving standards for article birth and death? (2) How is view- ership affected by the decreasing notability of articles in the long tail? The answers to five detailed research questions that ar e in- spired by these overarching questions should help better frame this debate and provide insight into how Wikipedia is evolving.
    Proceedings of the 2009 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, GROUP 2009, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, May 10-13, 2009; 01/2009
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.
    Nature 01/2006; 438(7070):900-1. DOI:10.1038/438900a · 41.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Wikipedia, a wiki-based encyclopedia, has become one of the most successful experiments in collaborative knowledge building on the Internet. As Wikipedia continues to grow, the potential for conflict and the need for coordination increase as well. This article examines the growth of such non-direct work and describes the development of tools to characterize conflict and coordination costs in Wikipedia. The results may inform the design of new collaborative knowledge systems. Author Keywords Wikipedia, wiki, collaboration, conflict, user model, Web-based interaction, visualization.
Show more