Life-threatening Events in Respiratory Medicine: Misconnections of Invasive and Non-invasive Ventilators and Interfaces.

Clinic for Pneumology and Allergology, Centre for Sleep and Ventilation Medicine.
Pneumologie 03/2013; 67(4). DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326230
Source: PubMed


Both the parallel use of intensive care unit (ICU)-ventilators and ventilators dedicated to non-invasive ventilation (NIV), as well as the construction of some expiratory valves in single circuit breathing tubes may lead to misconnections which are potentially fatal for the patient.

We demonstrate first a case of a misconnected expiratory valve in a patient with invasive home ventilation. In a second case, the mistaken connection of a non-invasive ventilator to an endotracheal tube leading to carbon dioxide (CO2)-rebreathing is demonstrated. A third case describes a patient with home non-invasive ventilation who had been delivered a non-vented mask out-of-hospital, likewise leading to CO2-rebreathing.

Human error is the main reason for critical incidents in medicine and the most serious unintended events often involve mechanical ventilation. A regular instruction of medical staff and patients is necessary. The demonstrated misconnections are examples of latent errors "waiting to happen". To prevent these errors from being made in the future, technological solutions similar to the aviation effort to improve safety are needed.

1 Follower
3 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The clinical, social and economical impact of failure in medicine [i. e., adverse health care events (AHCE)] is overwhelming. Respiratory and intensive care medicine are strongly relevant to AHCE, particularly in cases associated with respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation and pharmacotherapy. In spite of the obvious necessity to learn from AHCE, its realisation in health-care organisations is still rare. This conceptual review therefore aims to (i) clarify the most relevant terminology, (ii) identify obstacles related to this health-care topic, and (iii) present possible strategies for solving the problems, thereby enabling respiratory and intensive care medicine to systematically and effectively learn from failure. A review of the literature (effective as of June 2013) derived from the electronic databases Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, ERIC and Google Scholar identified the following relevant obstacles (ii): a so-called blame culture associated with concealing failure, missing system analyses (vs. individual breakdown), and (economically) misdirected incentives. Possible strategies to overcome these obstacles (iii) include acknowledging the importance of leadership, a safe environment, open reporting, an effective feedback culture, and detection (e. g., trigger-tools), analysis and discussion (e. g., double loop learning) of failure. The underlying reasons for the occurrence of AHCE are based on structural, organisational and human shortcomings, and affect all categories of caregivers. Approaches to solving the problem should therefore focus primarily on the entire system, rather than on the individual alone.
    Pneumologie 07/2013; 67(8). DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1344343
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The success of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is primarily based on good clinical indicators. Three important parameters are involved — the ventilator, the mask and the patient. The choice of the equipment used will therefore be based on several criteria, such as, patient’s face profile, pathology and comorbidities, and even to some extent the expected duration of ventilation. Nowadays, a large collection of interface is available. When the choice was finally made on a mask, several technical criteria related to it must be observed. The good knowledge of all these aspects will lead to higher chances of success. © 2015, Société de réanimation de langue française (SRLF) and Springer-Verlag France.