Article

Experimental assessment of a novel robotically-driven endoscopic capsule compared to traditional colonoscopy

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Italy. Electronic address: .
Digestive and Liver Disease (Impact Factor: 2.89). 02/2013; 45(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.01.025
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Despite colonoscopy represents the conventional diagnostic tool for colorectal pathology, its undeniable discomfort reduces compliance to screening programmes. AIMS: To evaluate feasibility and accuracy of a novel robotically-driven magnetic capsule for colonoscopy as compared to the traditional technique. METHODS: Eleven experts and eleven trainees performed complete colonoscopy by robotic magnetic capsule and by conventional colonoscope in a phantom ex vivo model (artificially clean swine bowel). Feasibility, overall accuracy to detect installed pins, procedure elapsed time and intuitiveness were measured for both techniques in both operator groups. RESULTS: Complete colonoscopy was feasible in all cases with both techniques. Overall 544/672 pins (80.9%) were detected by experimental capsule procedure, while 591/689 pins (85.8%) were detected within conventional colonoscopy procedure (P=ns), thus establishing non-inferiority. With the experimental capsule procedure, experts detected 74.2% of pins vs. 87.6% detected by trainees (P<0.0001). Overall time to complete colon inspection by robotic capsule was significantly higher than by conventional colonoscopy (556±188s vs. 194±158s, respectively; P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: With the limitations represented by an ex vivo setting (artificially clean swine bowel and the absence of peristalsis), colonoscopy by this novel robotically-driven capsule resulted feasible and showed adequate accuracy compared to conventional colonoscopy.

Full-text

Available from: Gioia Lucarini, Dec 01, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
77 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last decade, wireless capsule endoscope has been the tool of choice for noninvasive inspection of the gastrointestinal tract, especially in the small intestine. However, the latest clinical products have not been equipped with a sufficiently accurate localization system which makes it difficult to determine the location of intestinal abnormalities, and to apply follow-up interventions such as biopsy or drug delivery. In this paper, the authors present a novel localization method based on tracking three positron emission markers embedded inside an endoscopic capsule.
    Medical Physics 07/2014; 41(7):072501. DOI:10.1118/1.4881316 · 3.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Practitioners of endoscopy often experience musculoskeletal pain and injury (most often in the back, neck, shoulders, hands, wrists, and thumbs) that are associated with the minute and repetitive strain that is placed on these areas during endoscopic procedures. This review of the current documentation of endoscopy-related pain and injuries among practitioners finds that such problems are widespread and specific in kind as well as strongly correlated with high procedure volume and procedure duration. Research on the nature and impact of cumulative trauma and overuse syndromes in other professions such as dentistry, pianists, production labor, and athletics is brought to bear on the work of the endoscopist. A more thorough understanding of the nature and prevalence of work-related pain and injury sustained by endoscopists should inform further development of ergonomic practices and equipment design. This article reviews current recommendations for ergonomic design in the endoscopy procedure space and finds that reported compliance with those recommendations is quite low. Strategies for the management of the risk of musculoskeletal injuries related to the practice of endoscopy include compliance with currently recommended ergonomic practices, education of trainees in ergonomic technique when practicing endoscopy, and research toward the modification and development of more ergonomic endoscopes and procedure spaces.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0.
    Journal of clinical gastroenterology 05/2014; DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000134 · 3.19 Impact Factor