Article

A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences

Perspectives on Psychological Science (Impact Factor: 4.89). 01/2012; 7(3):203-220. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612442904

ABSTRACT With over 800 million active users, Facebook is changing the way hundreds of millions of people relate to one another and share information. A rapidly growing body of research has accompanied the meteoric rise of Facebook as social scientists assess the impact of Facebook on social life. In addition, researchers have recognized the utility of Facebook as a novel tool to observe behavior in a naturalistic setting, test hypotheses, and recruit participants. However, research on Facebook emanates from a wide variety of disciplines, with results being published in a broad range of journals and conference proceedings, making it difficult to keep track of various findings. And because Facebook is a relatively recent phenomenon, uncertainty still exists about the most effective ways to do Facebook research. To address these issues, the authors conducted a comprehensive literature search, identifying 412 relevant articles, which were sorted into 5 categories: descriptive analysis of users, motivations for using Facebook, identity presentation, the role of Facebook in social interactions, and privacy and information disclosure. The literature review serves as the foundation from which to assess current findings and offer recommendations to the field for future research on Facebook and online social networks more broadly.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
476 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the advent of social networking site (SNS) technologies, adolescents' use of these technologies has expanded and is now a primary way of communicating with and acquiring information about others in their social network. Overall, adolescents and young adults' stated motivations for using SNSs are quite similar to more traditional forms of communication-to stay in touch with friends, make plans, get to know people better, and present oneself to others. We begin with a summary of theories that describe the role of SNSs in adolescents' interpersonal relationships, as well as common methodologies used in this field of research thus far. Then, with the social changes that occur throughout adolescence as a backdrop, we address the ways in which SNSs intersect with key tasks of adolescent psychosocial development, specifically peer affiliation and friendship quality, as well as identity development. Evidence suggests that SNSs differentially relate to adolescents' social connectivity and identity development, with sociability, self-esteem, and nature of SNS feedback as important potential moderators. We synthesize current findings, highlight unanswered questions, and recommend both methodological and theoretical directions for future research.
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 05/2013; · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Social networks have become an additional marketing channel that could be integrated with the traditional ones as a part of the marketing mix. The change in the dynamics of the marketing interchange between companies and consumers as introduced by social networks has placed a focus on the non-transactional customer behavior. In this new marketing era, the terms engagement and participation became the central non-transactional constructs, used to describe the nature of participants’ specific interactions and/or interactive experiences. These changes imposed challenges to the traditional one-way marketing, resulting in companies experimenting with many different approaches, thus shaping a successful social media approach based on the trial-and-error experiences. To provide insights to practitioners willing to utilize social networks for marketing purposes, our study analyzes the influencing factors in terms of characteristics of the content communicated by the company, such as media type, content type, posting day and time, over the level of online customer engagement measured by number of likes, comments and shares, and interaction duration for the domain of a Facebook brand page. Our results show that there is a different effect of the analyzed factors over individual engagement measures. We discuss the implications of our findings for social media marketing.
    Social Network Analysis and Mining.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Every once in a while, performing an audit of our digital lives can prove an edu-cational experience. Like 1.11 billion other users worldwide, the chances are that you actively engage with Facebook on at least a monthly basis (Facebook, 2013). Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly unlikely that this will be the only form of social media with which you engage; perhaps like 288 million others you are transfixed with tweeting (GlobalWebIndex, 2013), or just maybe you are akin to the 238 million users who proclaim their professional credentials on LinkedIn (LinkedIn, 2013). Further reflection may even reveal something about how you prefer to manage your multifaceted digital life. Perhaps you elect to seamlessly blend the personal and professional spheres of your social world on just a smat-tering of sites. Or could it be that you compartmentalize the different facets of your life across numerous platforms, each serving its own distinct purpose? One thing is for sure: a plethora of choice facilitates numerous strategies for how we might undertake the management of our digital identities. As an umbrella term used to encapsulate the online activities of social net-working, content sharing, blogging and microblogging (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010), 'social media' adopts many guises; from the battle-hardened, consistently familiar feel of Facebook and the staid hues of LinkedIn, to the youthful, aes-thetic exuberance of Instagram and Pinterest. Although the well-documented demise of early social networking sites such as SixDegrees and Friendster (boyd and Ellison, 2007) serve as timely reminders that size of user-base is no guar-antee of longevity, the ever-expanding range of social media to have blossomed around the fertile grounds of Facebook should provide impetus for social sci-ence researchers to broaden their focus out beyond the world's largest social networking site (see Wilson, Gosling and Graham, 2012). As Kietzmann, Hermkens, McCarthy and Silvestre (2011: 242) state, "there currently exists a rich and diverse ecology of social media sites, which vary in 6241-343.indb 217 2/14/2014 1:09:10 PM 218 t Carter, Martin and O'Malley terms of their scope and functionality. " The ecological metaphor employed here forms an important foundation upon which much of the following discussion is constructed. Although Kietzmann and colleagues do not appear to explicitly attribute a definitive provenance to the term, the biological imagery appears to have much in common with media ecology theory, that is, "the study of media as environments" (Postman, 1970: 161). Although it is not the intention to frame the proceeding discussion specifically within the parameters of the theory, it seems meritorious to embrace the general notion that different forms of social media can constitute distinctive digital environments; discreetly fitting together to provide the user with a range of outlets for use within a professional context. To paraphrase McLuhan (2003: 271), social media ecologies are about interacting with the sites in ways that are complementary, rather than cancel-ling each other out. A core aim of this chapter is to explore how employees within Higher Edu-cation Institutions (HEI) draw on different elements of their social media ecologies to support their interactions with students, colleagues and profes-sional peers. HEIs are complex organizations, quite often with equally complex missions requiring the engagement of employees from across a distinct range of roles (Whitchurch, 2006). As reflected in a wider trend of organizations "going social" (Brown & Vaughn, 2011; KPMG, 2011), the increasing centrality of social media within the lives of the student population (Selwyn, 2009) provides a particularly compelling reason for Higher Education employees to take social media seriously, regardless of whether their role is primarily administrative or academic in focus. As the UK-based Joint Information Systems Commit-tee (JISC) Information Strategy Guidelines emphasize, information is the "lifeblood" of HEIs (Orna, 2004; Pollock, 2000). As a form of communication technology, social media appear to excel precisely in supporting this endeavor. Furthermore, in a digital society where reputation is becoming an increas-ingly prominent feature of the digital economy (Masum, Newmark, & Tovey, 2012), social media users employed within HEIs appear to be faced with an ongoing challenge of how to engage in authentic, open communication while attenuating the risk of reputational damage to either themselves or their employer. The following discussion draws on the qualitative findings of a case study to explore how employees of both administrative and academic roles within an HEI address this task while using Facebook and other elements of their social media ecologies to interact with students, colleagues and profes-sional peers outside of their institution.
    05/2014: pages 217 - 225; , ISBN: 9781134676088

Full-text

View
2,483 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014