Simultaneous Top-down Modulation of the Primary Somatosensory Cortex and Thalamic Nuclei during Active Tactile Discrimination

Departments of Neurobiology, Biomedical Engineering, and Psychology and Neuroscience and Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, Neuroscience Program, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481, and Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute for Neuroscience of Natal, 59066-060 Natal, Brazil.
The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 6.34). 02/2013; 33(9):4076-93. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1659-12.2013
Source: PubMed


The rat somatosensory system contains multiple thalamocortical loops (TCLs) that altogether process, in fundamentally different ways, tactile stimuli delivered passively or actively sampled. To elucidate potential top-down mechanisms that govern TCL processing in awake, behaving animals, we simultaneously recorded neuronal ensemble activity across multiple cortical and thalamic areas while rats performed an active aperture discrimination task. Single neurons located in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), the ventroposterior medial, and the posterior medial thalamic nuclei of the trigeminal somatosensory pathways exhibited prominent anticipatory firing modulations before the whiskers touching the aperture edges. This cortical and thalamic anticipatory firing could not be explained by whisker movements or whisker stimulation, because neither trigeminal ganglion sensory-evoked responses nor EMG activity were detected during the same period. Both thalamic and S1 anticipatory activity were predictive of the animal's discrimination accuracy. Inactivation of the primary motor cortex (M1) with muscimol affected anticipatory patterns in S1 and the thalamus, and impaired the ability to predict the animal's performance accuracy based on thalamocortical anticipatory activity. These findings suggest that neural processing in TCLs is launched in anticipation of whisker contact with objects, depends on top-down effects generated in part by M1 activity, and cannot be explained by the classical feedforward model of the rat trigeminal system.

1 Follower
36 Reads
  • Source
    • "The changes in the wavelets coefficient start increasing after a delay of approx. 1 s, to reach a stationary state in a few more seconds. shorter intervals were observed following active sensory shifts (Pais-Vieira et al., 2013), in line with the conclusions by Winter et al. (2008) based on a stimulus timing-matching paradigm, who found no advantage on the perceived timing of an active over a passive touch. Latencies of EMG and postural changes were the shortest on removal of haptic information. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Maintaining equilibrium is basically a sensorimotor integration task. The central nervous system (CNS) continually and selectively weights and rapidly integrates sensory inputs from multiple sources, and coordinates multiple outputs. The weighting process is based on the availability and accuracy of afferent signals at a given instant, on the time-period required to process each input, and possibly on the plasticity of the relevant pathways. The likelihood that sensory inflow changes while balancing under static or dynamic conditions is high, because subjects can pass from a dark to a well-lit environment or from a tactile-guided stabilization to loss of haptic inflow. This review article presents recent data on the temporal events accompanying sensory transition, on which basic information is fragmentary. The processing time from sensory shift to reaching a new steady state includes the time to (a) subtract or integrate sensory inputs; (b) move from allocentric to egocentric reference or vice versa; and (c) adjust the calibration of motor activity in time and amplitude to the new sensory set. We present examples of processes of integration of posture-stabilizing information, and of the respective sensorimotor time-intervals while allowing or occluding vision or adding or subtracting tactile information. These intervals are short, in the order of 1-2 s for different postural conditions, modalities and deliberate or passive shift. They are just longer for haptic than visual shift, just shorter on withdrawal than on addition of stabilizing input, and on deliberate than unexpected mode. The delays are the shortest (for haptic shift) in blind subjects. Since automatic balance stabilization may be vulnerable to sensory-integration delays and to interference from concurrent cognitive tasks in patients with sensorimotor problems, insight into the processing time for balance control represents a critical step in the design of new balance- and locomotion training devices.
    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 10/2014; 8:190. DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00190
  • Source
    • "(D–F) same as (A–C) but during photosuppression of layer VI, and using a cell from layer IV as example; scale bar in (D) 50 spikes/s; population tuning curve in (F) is the average of n = 52 units. (Reprinted from Olsen et al., 2012 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The thalamus is a key structure that controls the routing of information in the brain. Understanding modulation at the thalamic level is critical to understanding the flow of information to brain regions involved in cognitive functions, such as the neocortex, the hippocampus, and the basal ganglia. Modulators contribute the majority of synapses that thalamic cells receive, and the highest fraction of modulator synapses is found in thalamic nuclei interconnected with higher order cortical regions. In addition, disruption of modulators often translates into disabling disorders of executive behavior. However, modulation in thalamic nuclei such as the midline and intralaminar groups, which are interconnected with forebrain executive regions, has received little attention compared to sensory nuclei. Thalamic modulators are heterogeneous in regards to their origin, the neurotransmitter they use, and the effect on thalamic cells. Modulators also share some features, such as having small terminal boutons and activating metabotropic receptors on the cells they contact. I will review anatomical and physiological data on thalamic modulators with these goals: first, determine to what extent the evidence supports similar modulator functions across thalamic nuclei; and second, discuss the current evidence on modulation in the midline and intralaminar nuclei in relation to their role in executive function.
    Frontiers in Neural Circuits 06/2014; 8. DOI:10.3389/fncir.2014.00069 · 3.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 06/2013; 33(26):10588-10590. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1768-13.2013 · 6.34 Impact Factor
Show more