Article

Evidence on prognosis.

Tokyo, Japan
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.33). 03/2013; 131(3):655-65. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6f90
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In the clinical decision-making process, prognostic information gives physicians guidance regarding disease and treatment that can be passed along to patients. Using the clinical scenario of a type IIIB open tibial fracture as an example, this article focuses on how to search prognostic literature effectively and how to critically appraise prognostic studies. A well-built clinical question using the Patients, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes methodology helps plastic surgeons derive information from the vast resources in an effective and time-efficient manner. Subsequent critical appraisal of the collected studies is the essential step for identifying the most relevant high-quality evidence to provide the best prognostic information to guide patient decision-making.

0 Followers
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A study was performed to analyze the results and final outcomes of bone reconstruction of the lower extremity. Twenty-six patients presented with type IIIB open fractures, nine with type IIIC open fractures, and 15 with chronic osteomyelitis. Seven patients underwent primary amputation, and reconstruction was attempted for 43 patients. The mean bone defect size was 7.7 cm (range, 3 to 20 cm). Bone reconstruction was achieved with conventional bone grafts in 16 cases, in association with either local (13 cases) or free (three cases) flaps. Vascularized bone transfer was performed in 24 cases, with either osteocutaneous groin flaps (10 cases), soleus-fibula flaps (12 cases), or osteocutaneous lateral arm flaps (two cases). For three patients, bone reconstruction was performed with a technique that combines the induction of a membrane around a cement spacer with the use of an autologous cancellous bone graft. Infections were observed to be responsible for prolonged hospital stays and treatment failures. The cumulative rates of sepsis were 4.6 percent at 1 week after injury and 62.8 percent at 2 months. Vascular complications were also related to infections and were responsible for four secondary amputations. One patient asked for secondary amputation because of a painful nonfunctional lower limb. Bone healing occurred in 37 of 43 cases, and the average time to union was 9.5 months, with an average of 8.7 procedures. The mean lengths of stay were 49 days for conventional bone grafts and 62 days for vascularized bone grafts. All of the 50 patients were able to walk, with an average time of 14 months. All of the patients with amputations underwent prosthetic rehabilitation. Patients mostly complained about the reconstructed limb (62.8 percent). Joint stiffness was present in 40 percent of the cases. Other long-term complications were pain (nine cases), lack of sensation (five cases), infection (five cases), and pseudarthrosis (one case). However, all of the patients with successful reconstructions preferred their salvaged leg to an amputation. Of 41 patients who were working before the injury, 26 returned to work.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 07/2003; 111(7):2223-9. DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000060116.21049.53 · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in reconstructive surgery have allowed for impressive salvage after severe lower-extremity trauma but not without complications when compared with immediate below-knee amputation. Several amputation index scores have been developed to help predict successful salvage as defined by a viable rather than a functional extremity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the predictive value of the amputation index scores and to assess prospectively overall health status and specific dysfunction in successful limb salvage and primary and secondary amputation by administering standardized generic and specific outcomes questionnaires (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). A retrospective chart review identified 55 severe lower-extremity injuries (Gustilo Type IIIB and IIIC) over a 12-year period (1984 to 1996). Forty-six severe open tibial fractures in 45 patients underwent attempted salvage. All required soft-tissue coverage by either local or free flap or vascular repair for leg salvage. The attempted-salvage group was subdivided into successful salvage and secondary amputation. The other nine patients underwent a primary amputation. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of patient demographics or other injuries (Injury Severity Score) in the three groups. Forty-eight of 54 patients with an average 5-year follow-up completed a validated generic and specific outcomes health questionnaire. In the attempted-salvage group, 89 percent of patients had a successful salvage and 11 percent came to a secondary amputation. The amputation index scores correctly predicted an amputation in 32 percent of patients. The magnitude of the amputation index scores did not correlate with the physical outcomes scores and were not found to add any significant value of information to the surgeon's decision making. Patients undergoing primary and secondary amputation had a worse physical outcomes score (28 versus 38) than successful salvage (p < 0.007). Even so, the SF-36 (physical component score) outcomes score for this group of injured extremities, regardless as to whether salvaged or amputated, was as low as or lower than that of many serious medical illnesses, suggesting that severe lower-extremity trauma impairs health as much as or more than being seriously ill. The mental component score in this group was comparable to that of a healthy population (49 versus 50), which implies the disability is primarily physical rather than psychological. Ninety-two percent of patients preferred their salvaged leg to an amputation at any stage of their injury, and none would have preferred a primary amputation.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 05/1999; 103(4):1212-20. DOI:10.1097/00006534-199904040-00017 · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) is a multicenter study of severe lower extremity trauma in the US civilian population. At 2- and 7-year follow-ups, the LEAP study found no difference in functional outcome between patients who underwent either limb salvage surgery or amputation. However, outcomes on average were poor for both groups. This study and others provide evidence of wide-ranging variations in outcome following major limb trauma, with a substantial proportion of patients experiencing long-term disability. In addition, outcomes often are more affected by the patient's economic, social, and personal resources than by the initial treatment of the injury--specifically, amputation or reconstruction and level of amputation. A conceptual framework for examining outcomes after injury may be used to identify opportunities for interventions that would improve outcomes. Because of essential differences between the civilian and military populations, the findings of the LEAP study may correlate only roughly with combat casualty outcomes.
    The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 11/2006; 14(10 Spec No.):S205-10. · 2.40 Impact Factor