Engineered genetic information processing circuits

Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Systems Biology and Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.21). 05/2013; 5(3). DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1216
Source: PubMed


Cells implement functions through the computation of biological information that is often mediated by genetic regulatory networks. To reprogram cells with novel capabilities, a vast set of synthetic gene circuits has recently been created. These include simple modules, such as feedback circuits, feed-forward loops, ultrasensitive networks, band-pass filters, logic gate operators and others, with each carrying a specific information processing functionality. More advanced cellular computation can also be achieved by assembling multiple simple processing modules into integrated computational cores. Further, when coupled with other modules such as sensors and actuators, integrated processing circuits enable sophisticated biological functionalities at both intra- and intercellular levels. Engineered genetic information processing circuits are transforming our ability to program cells, offering us extraordinary opportunities to explore biological mechanisms and to address real-world challenges. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2013. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1216 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. These authors contributed equally to the work.

12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The reductionist approach has revolutionized biology in the past 50 years. Yet its limits are being felt as the complexity of cellular interactions is gradually revealed by high-throughput technology. In order to make sense of the deluge of "omic data", a hypothesis-driven view is needed to understand how biomolecular interactions shape cellular networks. We review recent efforts aimed at building in vitro biochemical networks that reproduce the flow of genetic regulation. We highlight how those efforts have culminated in the rational construction of biochemical oscillators and bistable memories in test tubes. We also recapitulate the lessons learned about in vivo biochemical circuits such as the importance of delays and competition, the links between topology and kinetics, as well as the intriguing resemblance between cellular reaction networks and ecosystems.
    Biotechnology advances 05/2013; 31(6). DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.04.008 · 9.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A promising alternative for unraveling the principles under which the dynamic interactions among genes lead to cellular phenotypes relies on mathematical and computational models at different levels of abstraction, from the molecular level of protein-DNA interactions to the system level of functional relationships among genes. This review article presents, under a bottom-up perspective, a hierarchy of approaches to modeling gene regulatory network dynamics, from microscopic descriptions at the single-molecule level in the spatial context of an individual cell to macroscopic models providing phenomenological descriptions at the population-average level. The reviewed modeling approaches include Molecular Dynamics, Particle-Based Brownian Dynamics, the Master Equation approach, Ordinary Differential Equations, and the Boolean logic abstraction. Each of these frameworks is motivated by a particular biological context and the nature of the insight being pursued. The setting of gene network dynamic models from such frameworks involves assumptions and mathematical artifacts often ignored by the non-specialist. This article aims at providing an entry point for biologists new to the field and computer scientists not acquainted with some recent biophysically-inspired models of gene regulation. The connections promoting intuition between different abstraction levels and the role that approximations play in the modeling process are highlighted throughout the paper.
    Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 02/2014; 12(1):1330003. DOI:10.1142/S0219720013300037 · 0.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cell cycles, essential for biological function, have been investigated extensively. However, enabling a global understanding and defining a physical quantification of the stability and function of the cell cycle remains challenging. Based upon a mammalian cell cycle gene network, we uncovered the underlying Mexican hat landscape of the cell cycle. We found the emergence of three local basins of attraction and two major potential barriers along the cell cycle trajectory. The three local basins of attraction characterize the G1, S/G2, and M phases. The barriers characterize the G1 and S/G2 checkpoints, respectively, of the cell cycle, thus providing an explanation of the checkpoint mechanism for the cell cycle from the physical perspective. We found that the progression of a cell cycle is determined by two driving forces: curl flux for acceleration and potential barriers for deceleration along the cycle path. Therefore, the cell cycle can be promoted (suppressed), either by enhancing (suppressing) the flux (representing the energy input) or by lowering (increasing) the barrier along the cell cycle path. We found that both the entropy production rate and energy per cell cycle increase as the growth factor increases. This reflects that cell growth and division are driven by energy or nutrition supply. More energy input increases flux and decreases barrier along the cell cycle path, leading to faster oscillations. We also identified certain key genes and regulations for stability and progression of the cell cycle. Some of these findings were evidenced from experiments whereas others lead to predictions and potential anticancer strategies.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 09/2014; 111(39). DOI:10.1073/pnas.1408628111 · 9.67 Impact Factor
Show more