Psychological Depression and Cardiac Surgery: A Comprehensive Review

Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
The Journal of extra-corporeal technology 12/2012; 44(4):224-32.
Source: PubMed


The psychological and neurological impact of cardiac surgery has been of keen empirical interest for more than two decades although reports showing the prognostic influence of depression on adverse outcomes lag behind the evidence documented in heart failure, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina. The paucity of research to date is surprising considering that some pathophysiological mechanisms through which depression is hypothesized to affect coronary heart disease (e.g., platelet activation, the inflammatory system, dysrhythmias) are known to be substantially influenced by the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. As such, cardiac surgery may provide a suitable exemplar to better understand the psychiatric mechanisms of cardiopathogenesis. The extant literature is comprehensively reviewed with respect to the deleterious impact of depression on cardiac and neuropsychological morbidity and mortality. Research to date indicates that depression and major depressive episodes increase major cardiovascular morbidity risk after cardiac surgery. The association between depressive disorders and incident delirium is of particular relevance to cardiac surgery staff. Contemporary treatment intervention studies are also described along with suggestions for future cardiac surgery research.

Download full-text


Available from: Phillip Tully, Oct 05, 2015
128 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To determine the extent to which differences in generic quality of life (QOL) between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients are explained by EuroSCORE and heart-team operability assessment. Methods A total of 146 high-risk patients with EuroSCORE > 6 and aged ≥ 75 years underwent TAVI (n = 80) or aortic valve replacement (n = 66) between February 2010 and July 2013. A total of 75 patients also completed preoperative and six month SF-12 QOL measures. Analyses examined incident major morbidity, compared six month QOL between groups adjusted for EuroSCORE and operability, and quantified rates of clinically significant QOL improvement and deterioration. Results The AVR group required longer ventilation (> 24 h) (TAVI 5.0% vs. AVR 20.6%, P = 0.004) and more units of red blood cells [TAVI 0 (0-1) vs. AVR 2 (0-3), P = 0.01]. New renal failure was higher in TAVI (TAVI 5.0% vs. AVR 0%, P = 0.06). TAVI patients reported significantly lower vitality (P = 0.01) by comparison to AVR patients, however these findings were no longer significant after adjustment for operability. In both procedures, clinically significant QOL improvement was common [range 25.0% (General Health) – 62.9% (Physical Role)] whereas deterioration in QOL occurred less frequently [range 9.3% (Physical Role) – 33.3% (Mental Health)]. Conclusions Clinically significant improvement and deterioration in QOL was evident at six months in high risk elderly aortic valve replacement patients. Overall QOL did not differ between TAVI and AVR once operability was taken into consideration.
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 12/2011; 12(1). DOI:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.01.004 · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • The Journal of extra-corporeal technology 12/2012; 44(4):233-4.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Declining mortality and major morbidity rates following cardiac surgery have led to increasing focus on patient quality of life (QOL). Beyond longevity, the impact of cardiac surgery on day-to-day functioning is incredibly salient to patients, their spouses and families. As such, QOL measures are a welcome and sometimes necessary addition to clinical trials. But how does one navigate the expansive market of QOL questionnaires, which QOL measures are applicable to cardiac surgery units, and how can they be used meaningfully in clinical practice? As nearly two decades have passed since QOL measures were reviewed for relevance to cardiac surgery settings, an overview is provided of various generic (Short Form Health Survey SF-36, Sickness Impact Profile, Nottingham Health Profile) and disease specific QOL measures (Duke Activity Status Index, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; Heart-QOL) is provided with examples from cardiac surgery studies. Recommendations are provided for the application of QOL measures to clinical trials and the impact on clinical decision making is discussed. The paucity of methodologically sound QOL studies highlights the necessity for further rigorous empirical data to better inform treatment efficacy studies and clinical decision making.
    The Journal of extra-corporeal technology 03/2013; 45(1):8-15.
Show more