Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries.

Centre for Evidence-Based Child Health and MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 39.21). 01/2009; 373(9657):68-81. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Child maltreatment remains a major public-health and social-welfare problem in high-income countries. Every year, about 4-16% of children are physically abused and one in ten is neglected or psychologically abused. During childhood, between 5% and 10% of girls and up to 5% of boys are exposed to penetrative sexual abuse, and up to three times this number are exposed to any type of sexual abuse. However, official rates for substantiated child maltreatment indicate less than a tenth of this burden. Exposure to multiple types and repeated episodes of maltreatment is associated with increased risks of severe maltreatment and psychological consequences. Child maltreatment substantially contributes to child mortality and morbidity and has longlasting effects on mental health, drug and alcohol misuse (especially in girls), risky sexual behaviour, obesity, and criminal behaviour, which persist into adulthood. Neglect is at least as damaging as physical or sexual abuse in the long term but has received the least scientific and public attention. The high burden and serious and long-term consequences of child maltreatment warrant increased investment in preventive and therapeutic strategies from early childhood.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This Section of Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences regularly appears in each issue of the Journal to describe relevant studies investigating the relationship between neurobiology and psychosocial psychiatry in major psychoses. The aim of these Editorials is to provide a better understanding of the neural basis of psycho pathology and clinical features of these disorders, in order to raise new perspectives in everyday clinical practice. Paolo Brambilla, Section Editor and Michele Tansella, Editor EPS
    Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 01/2013; 21(21):347-351. · 3.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We suggest that shame and silencing are two of the most common reactions to children's experiences of witnessing domestic violence, on the part of associated adults and the children themselves. We also draw on British object relations theories about shame and its links to visuality to examine the particular possibilities inherent in the use of art therapy as a treatment modality for experiences which are heavily shame-laden. In doing so we present a case study of an 11-year-old girl's engagement with an art therapy group for children who had witnessed domestic violence and illustrate how the group facilitated her working-through of her experience of being both shamed and silenced, along with her subsequent re-establishment of a more emotionally close relationship with her mother. Arguing that art therapy has historically been under-used among the range of support options offered to children who have witnessed domestic violence in the UK, the article constructs an argument to counter this trend and to advocate for greater involvement of art therapists and art therapy among this client population.
    International Journal of Art Therapy 03/2012; 17(1):3-12.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Questionnaire data from a cross-sectional study of a randomly selected sample of 5,149 middle-school students from four EU countries (Austria, Germany, Slovenia, and Spain) were used to explore the effects of family violence burden level, structural and procedural risk and protective factors, and personal characteristics on adolescents who are resilient to depression and aggression despite being exposed to domestic violence. Using logistic regression to identify resilience characteristics, our results indicate that structural risks like one's sex, migration experience, and socioeconomic status were not predictive of either family violence burden levels or resilience. Rather, nonresilience to family violence is derived from a combination of negative experiences with high levels of family violence in conjunction with inconsistent parenting, verbally aggressive teachers, alcohol and drug misuse and experiences of indirect aggression with peers. Overall, negative factors outweigh positive factors and play a greater role in determining the resilience level that a young person achieves.
    Child & Youth Services 01/2013; 34(1):37-63.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 23, 2014