Article

Sociodemographic disparities in epilepsy care: Results from the Houston/New York City health care use and outcomes study

The University of Texas, School of Public Health, Division of Management, Policy, and Community Health, Houston, Texas, USA.
Epilepsia (Impact Factor: 4.58). 12/2008; 50(5):1040-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01898.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to identify sociodemographic disparities in health care use among epilepsy patients receiving care at different sites and the extent to which the disparities persisted after adjusting for patient characteristics and site of care.
Three months of health care use data were obtained from baseline interviews of approximately 560 patients at four sites. One-half of the patients were from a Houston site and two NYC sites that serve predominantly low-income, minority, publicly insured, or uninsured patients. The other half were at the remaining site in Houston that serves a more balanced racial/ethnic and higher sociodemographic population. Differences in general and specialist visits, hospital emergency room (ER) care, and hospitalizations were associated with race/ethnicity, income, and coverage. Logistic regression was used to assess the extent to which the differences persisted when adjusting for individual patient characteristics and site of care.
Compared to whites, blacks and Hispanics had higher rates of generalist visits [odds ratio (OR) = 5.3 and 4.9, p < 0.05), ER care (OR = 3.1 and 2.9, p < 0.05) and hospitalizations (OR = 5.4 and 6.2, p < 0.05), and lower rates of specialist visits (OR = 0.3 and 0.4, p < 0.05). A similar pattern was found related to patient income and coverage. The magnitude and significance of the disparities persisted when adjusting for individual characteristics but decreased substantially or were eliminated when site of care was added to the model.
There are sociodemographic disparities in health care for people with epilepsy that are largely explained by differences in where patients receive care.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: David Lairson, Oct 08, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
74 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Indigenous Australians suffer the highest mortality and morbidity rates of any ethnic minority in the developed world. To determine if the health outcome gulf between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians also applied to seizures, we conducted a retrospective analysis of seizure hospitalization (1998-2004) based on ethnicity (indigenous (I) and non-indigenous (NI)) for four Australian jurisdictions - Northern Territory (NT), Queensland (Qld), South Australia (SA), and Western Australia (WA). Total admissions were converted to age-standardized rates (ASR) and I/NI ASR ratios (I/NIRR) and compared across multiple variables. The summed admission (combined jurisdictions over six years) was 71,185 (I=11,593 and NI=59,592). Seizure hospitalization rate was always higher in the indigenous population (six-year I/NIRR - NT=5.6, Qld=4.0, SA=6.4, and WA=10.9; combined jurisdictions=5.6). Disparity was greatest for ages 40-64years (13.8) and 15-39years (7.0) and for indigenous males (7.4). As socioeconomic status rose, non-indigenous admission rates fell (ASR=1.7 to 1.1), yet indigenous admission rates rose (ASR=7.9 to 14.0). Indigenous emergency to elective admission ratios were higher (I=27 and NI=8), as were readmissions (1.5-2 fold), self-discharge separations (I=9.4% and NI=1.4%), bed days (I/NIRR=5.1), and admissions with an additional diagnosis (I/NIRR=3.3) or procedure (I/NIRR=3.4). Indigenous Australians maintained disproportionately high rates of emergency seizure hospitalization; from 1998 to 2004, the combined jurisdiction rate was more than five times the mean non-indigenous rate. Indigenous males aged 15-64years were overrepresented. Indigenous patients had lengthier admissions but higher self-discharge and readmission rates. The socioeconomic data raise the concern that social disadvantage restricts access to hospital-based seizure care for indigenous patients.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 11/2013; 31. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.09.042 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network was established in 2007 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epilepsy Program to expand epilepsy self-management research. The network has employed collaborative research strategies to develop, test, and disseminate evidence-based, community-based, and e-Health interventions (e-Tools) for epilepsy self-management for people with epilepsy, caregivers, and health-care providers. Since its inception, MEW Network collaborators have conducted formative studies (n=7) investigating the potential of e-Health to support epilepsy self-management and intervention studies evaluating e-Tools (n=5). The MEW e-Tools (the MEW website, WebEase, UPLIFT, MINDSET, and PEARLS online training) and affiliated e-Tools (Texting 4 Control) are designed to complement self-management practices in each phase of the epilepsy care continuum. These tools exemplify a concerted research agenda, shared methodological principles and models for epilepsy self-management, and a communal knowledge base for implementing e-Health to improve quality of life for people with epilepsy.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 08/2013; 29(1):133-140. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.07.002 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This community-based survey of people with epilepsy who were divided into adherent and non-adherent groups used validated scales to determine factors associated with medicine non-adherence and self-management of epilepsy to identify those people at risk of poor self-management behavior or medicines non-adherence. Using demographic characteristics, it is possible to identify those people at risk during a regular epilepsy review. Adults with epilepsy were identified from general practices using clinical and drug searches with the diagnosis confirmed by case notes analysis. Four hundred thirty-eight people with epilepsy were divided into adherent and non-adherent groups using medication records and self-report of non-adherent behavior. Data were also collected on patient demographics, seizure activity and self-management behavior. Low self-management scores and recent seizures were associated with non-adherence. Young adults, those in education or employment, those living with others and those who had recent seizures were more likely to have low self-management scores.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 12/2012; 26(1). DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.10.021 · 2.06 Impact Factor