Article

Case 34-2012: Severe Pain, Bleeding, and Shock during Labor

New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 02/2013; 368(8):777-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1214823#SA1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To the Editor: The description in the Case Record by Getahun et al. of uterine rupture during labor (Nov. 8 issue)(1) raises awareness about the possibility of this catastrophic event, which occurs far too often in low-resource settings, even when obstetric services are available.(2) Uterine rupture occurs almost exclusively in multiparous women, often with prolonged labor. In nulliparous women, neglected obstructed labor is more likely to result in a vesicovaginal fistula. We have witnessed women in whom a fistula developed in their first pregnancy and ruptured the uterus in a subsequent pregnancy. The use of partography is essential in the . . .

1 Follower
 · 
108 Views
 · 
0 Downloads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review the incidence of ruptured uteri at the Women's Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) and to analyze the causative factors of uterine rupture with a view to its prevention and to highlight the management approach taken to preserve the patient's reproductive potential. Case notes were reviewed for all patients (except for eight which were not available) with a ruptured uterus at the Women's Hospital in Doha for a period of 21 years from 1 July 1977 to 30 June 1997, relevant data relating to the clinical features characteristics of labor, operative procedures, and maternal perinatal outcome were assessed. There were 31 cases of ruptured uteri. The incidence of ruptured uteri was calculated to be 0.017%, 23 cases being available for the study. Ten cases (43.5%) occurred in patients with previous cesarean scars, while 13 cases (56.5%) were grand multiparous (para 5 or more). In 10 cases (43.5%) uterine rupture was associated with oxytocin use, and four cases (18.2%) were associated with PGE2 use. The ruptures occurred in the lower segment of 19 cases (90.9%). Fetal heart abnormalities were observed in all cases except one in which the uterus ruptured during labor. Abdominal hysterectomy was performed in 15 cases (65.2%). The remaining eight patients had suture repair, two of them had suture repair with sterilization and the other six cases (26.1%) had suture repair without sterilization. Five of them became pregnant and were delivered by cesarean section. Even though rupture of the uterus was rare in our study, its occurrence should be suspected when there are sudden fetal heart abnormalities during labor or unexpected postpartum shock. Suture repair should be considered whenever possible in order to maintain the patient's future fertility.
    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 12/1998; 63(2):105-8. DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00124-6 · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Uterine rupture is a catastrophic obstetric complication, associated with high rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality. The most common risk factor is previous uterine surgery, and most cases of uterine rupture occur in women with a previous cesarean delivery. Traditionally, the primigravid uterus has been considered almost immune to spontaneous rupture. In fact, although spontaneous rupture of the primigravid uterus is indeed a very rare event, a number of such cases have been reported recently. Prompt recognition of uterine rupture and expeditious recourse to laparotomy are critical in influencing perinatal and maternal morbidity. Not all uterine ruptures present with the typical clinical picture of abdominal pain, hypovolemia, vaginal bleeding, and fetal compromise. Therefore, it is important to maintain a high index of suspicion for uterine rupture in women presenting with some, or all, of these features, regardless of parity. Here we provide a systematic review of cases of spontaneous uterine rupture in primigravid women reported in the literature to date. Clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, common etiological factors, complication rates, and appropriate management of this rare obstetric event are discussed. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to recall that uterine rupture in a primigravida is a rare event, without typical signs and symptoms, and explain that the morbidity and mortality of the mother and child is directly related to a high index of suspicion and prompt treatment by the clinician.
    Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 05/2007; 62(5):327-34; quiz 353-4. DOI:10.1097/01.ogx.0000261643.11301.56 · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increased availability of oxytocin and misoprostol is needed to reduce the risk of postpartum hemorrhage. This review compiles rates and risks of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with use of these medications for labor induction and augmentation in low-income countries. Recommendations are proposed based on the findings. We did a structured literature review using 5 databases followed by analysis of induction and augmentation rates from existing data. Combined induction and augmentation rates were documented in up to 50% of hospital-based deliveries identified in the databases. Data are sparse but suggest associations between induction/augmentation and stillbirth, neonatal resuscitation, and uterine rupture, and inappropriate administration of oxytocin and misoprostol both outside and inside healthcare systems in low-income countries. Guidelines for labor induction/augmentation are needed specifically for low resourced settings. Rigorous studies should be pursued to quantify the magnitude and effect of inappropriate induction and augmentation on maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Programs are needed to ensure community-wide awareness of the adverse effects of the improper use of these drugs on mothers and babies, especially in out-of-hospital settings.
    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 01/2009; 103(3):276-82. DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.08.009 · 1.56 Impact Factor