Comparison of carbamazepine and lithium in treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Department of Psychiatry, Medical College, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (Impact Factor: 1.85). 01/2009; 24(1):19-28. DOI: 10.1002/hup.990
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To review data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the comparative efficacy of carbamazepine and lithium in treatment of acute manic and maintenance phase of bipolar disorder (BD).
RCTs were identified through a search strategy that included: electronic databases, reference cross-checking, hand search of non-indexed publications, and book chapters on the treatment of BD comparing carbamazepine with lithium. Outcomes investigated were antimanic effect, trial withdrawal, relapse, hospitalization, need for rescue medication, and presence of adverse effects. Selection of studies and data analysis were performed independently by authors. Whenever possible, data from trials were combined through meta-analyses. Relative risks (RR) were estimated for dichotomous data.
In acute mania, carbamazepine was similar to lithium on the following outcomes: trial withdrawal due to adverse effects, number of participants with at least one adverse effect, improvement in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI). In acute mania, carbamazepine was associated with fewer trial withdrawals. In maintenance treatment, carbamazepine was similar to lithium in relapses and hospitalization, but there were fewer trial withdrawals due to adverse effects on lithium.
This review suggests that carbamazepine might be comparable to lithium in terms of efficacy and safety, and therefore a valuable option in the treatment of both manic and maintenance phases.

Download full-text


Available from: John R Geddes, Jul 07, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: (1) Milnacipran is an antidepressant that is under investigation for the treatment of fibromyalgia (a chronic pain disorder). (2) Preliminary evidence suggests that milnacipran may benefit some patients with fibromyalgia, but adverse effects may limit its use. (3) Complete results of phase 3 trials have not yet been published. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of milnacipran, determine optimal dosing, confirm if beneficial effects are sustained, and clarify the drug's role relative to, and in conjunction with, other treatments for fibromyalgia.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Depression often coexists with epilepsy. Simultaneous therapy of the two diseases may be associated with pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic and antidepressant drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of acute and chronic treatment with intraperitoneal milnacipran (MLN), a selective serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, on the protective activity of valproate, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, or phenobarbital (PB) in the maximal electroshock (MES) test in mice. Electroconvulsions were produced by an alternating current (50 Hz, 25 mA) delivered via ear-clip electrodes. Motor coordination and long-term memory were evaluated in the chimney test and passive-avoidance task, respectively. Brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were assessed by immunofluorescence. Given acutely, MLN at 10 mg/kg increased the convulsive threshold. Acute MLN applied at the subprotective dose of 5 mg/kg enhanced the anticonvulsant effects of CBZ and PB. Chronic treatment with MLN (5-30 mg/kg once daily for 2 weeks) did not affect either the electroconvulsive threshold or the anticonvulsant action of all studied conventional antiepileptic drugs. Since the antidepressant did not affect brain concentrations of antiepileptics used in the study, the revealed interactions seem to be of pharmacodynamic nature. Moreover, acute and chronic MLN, AEDs, and their combinations did not produce significant motor and long-term memory impairment. Acute, but not chronic, treatment with MLN can increase the effectiveness of some AEDs against MES-induced seizures in mice. It seems that MLN may also be considered as a candidate drug for clinical trials in patients with epilepsy and depressive disorders.
    Psychopharmacology 10/2009; 207(4):661-9. DOI:10.1007/s00213-009-1698-x · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the marketing of a number of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in recent years it seemed possible that the pattern of Australian prescribing for patients with epilepsy may have been changing. We examined the trends in the prescribing of subsidised AEDs in the Australian population from 2002 to 2007. We analysed the Medicare Australia and Drug Utilisation Sub-Committee databases for script data for AEDs from 2002 to 2007 in 5-year age groups by gender and by class of prescriber. Scripts were converted to defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000/day using Australian Bureau of Statistics population data. Overall AED use (mainly valproate, lamotrigine and levetiracetam) increased progressively in 2002-2007 from 9.33 to 10.12 DDD/1000 population/day. Sodium valproate was the most widely used agent followed by carbamazepine then phenytoin. Amount of AED used increased in those aged in their 20s and 30s to plateau between 40 and 90 years. Use peaked in those aged 80-84 years and was slightly higher in males than females. The rate of increase in the prescribing of AEDs remained steady between 2002 and 2007. The gender differences in prescribing reflect the higher prevalence of epilepsy in men and higher individual dosages used when many AEDs are prescribed on a body weight basis. The high use of some of these drugs in elderly people (> or =80 years) warrants further exploration. There is growing use of lamotrigine and gabapentin for indications apart from epilepsy-most likely neuropathic pain and mood disorders.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 01/2010; 19(1):82-9. DOI:10.1002/pds.1871 · 3.17 Impact Factor

Similar Publications