Article

Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 16.1). 02/2013; 158(4):271-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Glaucoma is an acquired degeneration of the optic nerve and a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Medical and surgical treatments that decrease intraocular pressure may prevent visual impairment and blindness.
To compare the effectiveness of medical, laser, and surgical treatments in adults with open-angle glaucoma with regard to decreasing intraocular pressure and preventing optic nerve damage, vision loss, and visual impairment.
MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and an existing database for systematic reviews (through 2 March 2011); MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and CENTRAL for primary studies (through 30 July 2012).
English-language systematic reviews; randomized, controlled trials; and quasi-randomized, controlled trials for most outcomes and observational studies for quality of life and harms.
Two investigators abstracted or checked information about study design, participants, and outcomes and assessed risk of bias and strength of evidence.
High-level evidence suggests that medical, laser, and surgical treatments decrease intraocular pressure and that medical treatment and trabeculectomy reduce the risk for optic nerve damage and visual field loss compared with no treatment. The direct effect of treatments on visual impairment and the comparative efficacy of different treatments are not clear. Harms of medical treatment are primarily local (ocular redness, irritation); surgical treatment carries a small risk for more serious complications.
Heterogeneous outcome definitions and measurements among the included studies; exclusion of many treatment studies that did not stratify results by glaucoma type.
Medical and surgical treatments for open-angle glaucoma lower intraocular pressure and reduce the risk for optic nerve damage over the short to medium term. Which treatments best prevent visual disability and improve patient-reported outcomes is unclear.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

0 Followers
 · 
106 Views
 · 
0 Downloads
  • Source
    • "Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide . Glaucoma is characterized by retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration and loss of visual field and it occurs with or without elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) [1]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuroprotective therapies which focus on factors leading to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) degeneration have been drawing more and more attention. The beneficial effects of nerve growth factor (NGF) on the glaucoma have been recently suggested, but its effects on eye tissue are complex and controversial in various studies. Recent clinical trials of systemically and topically administrated NGF demonstrate that NGF is effective in treating several ocular diseases, including glaucoma. NGF has two receptors named high affinity NGF tyrosine kinase receptor TrkA and low affinity receptor p75NTR. Both receptors exist in cells in retina like RGC (expressing TrkA) and glia cells (expressing p75NTR). NGF functions by binding to TrkA or p75NTR alone or both together. The binding of NGF to TrkA alone in RGC promotes RGC's survival and proliferation through activation of TrkA and several prosurvival pathways. In contrast, the binding of NGF to p75NTR leads to apoptosis although it also promotes survival in some cases. Binding of NGF to both TrkA and p75NTR at the same time leads to survival in which p75NTR functions as a TrkA helping receptor. This review discusses the current understanding of the NGF signaling in retina and the therapeutic implications in the treatment of glaucoma.
    BioMed Research International 08/2014; 2014:759473. DOI:10.1155/2014/759473 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cellular aging occurs by the lifelong accumulation of oxidative damage leading to neuronal apoptosis, termed 'neurodegeneration', and the functional deficits of aging. Loss of visual function is one of the most important quality of life measures for older adults. We discuss recent clinical and laboratory advances in the neuroprotective treatment of the aging eye with particular emphasis on the three major ocular neurodegenerative conditions: glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and diabetic retinopathy (DR).
    Missouri medicine 11/2012; 110(5):429-36.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dedicator of cytokinesis 3 (Dock3), a new member of the guanine nucleotide exchange factors for the small GTPase Rac1, promotes axon regeneration following optic nerve injury. In the present study, we found that Dock3 directly binds to the intracellular C-terminus domain of NR2B, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit. In transgenic mice overexpressing Dock3 (Dock3 Tg), NR2B expression in the retina was significantly decreased and NMDA-induced retinal degeneration was ameliorated. In addition, overexpression of Dock3 protected retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) from oxidative stress. We previously reported that glutamate/aspartate transporter (GLAST) is a major glutamate transporter in the retina, and RGC degeneration due to glutamate neurotoxicity and oxidative stress is observed in GLAST-deficient (KO) mice. In GLAST KO mice, the NR2B phosphorylation rate in the retina was significantly higher compared with Dock3 Tg:GLAST KO mice. Consistently, glaucomatous retinal degeneration was significantly improved in GLAST KO:Dock3 Tg mice compared with GLAST KO mice. These results suggest that Dock3 overexpression prevents glaucomatous retinal degeneration by suppressing both NR2B-mediated glutamate neurotoxicity and oxidative stress, and identifies Dock3 signaling as a potential therapeutic target for both neuroprotection and axonal regeneration.Cell Death and Differentiation advance online publication, 12 July 2013; doi:10.1038/cdd.2013.91.
    Cell death and differentiation 07/2013; 20(9). DOI:10.1038/cdd.2013.91 · 8.39 Impact Factor
Show more