Magnetic resonance of calcified tissues
ABSTRACT MRI of the human body is largely made possible by the favorable relaxation properties of protons of water and triacyl glycerides prevalent in soft tissues. Hard tissues - key among them bone - are generally less amenable to measurement with in vivo MR imaging techniques, not so much as a result of the lower proton density but rather due to the extremely short life-times of the proton signal in water bound to solid-like entities, typically collagen, or being trapped in micro-pores. Either mechanism can enhance T2 relaxation by up to three orders of magnitude relative to their soft-tissue counterparts. Detection of these protons requires solid-state techniques that have emerged in recent years and that promise to add a new dimension to the study of hard tissues. Alternative approaches to probe calcified tissues exploit their characteristic magnetic properties. Bone, teeth and extra-osseous calcium-containing biomaterials are unique in that they are more diamagnetic than all other tissues and thus yield information indirectly by virtue of the induced magnetic fields present in their vicinity. Progress has also been made in methods allowing very high-resolution structural imaging of trabecular and cortical bone relying on detection of the surrounding soft-tissues. This brief review, much of it drawn from work conducted in the author's laboratory, seeks to highlight opportunities with focus on early-stage developments for image-based assessment of structure, function, physiology and mechanics of calcified tissues in humans via liquid and solid-state approaches, including proton, deuteron and phosphorus NMR and MRI.
- SourceAvailable from: Claudio Tuniz
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "More recently, magnetic resonance microimaging (mMRI) methods have been developed and refined (Callaghan, 1995) to provide images characterized by a spatial resolution of approximately 100 mm or smaller. They have been particularly useful for investigating porous systems (Strange et al., 1993; Allen et al., 1997) and bones (De Santis et al., 2010; Wehrli, 2013). Specifically, mMRI techniques are able to retrieve high resolution information about the density, the mean diameter, and the distribution of microfeatures in porous systems. "
ABSTRACT: Fieldwork performed during the last 15 years in various Early Pleistocene East African sites has significantly enlarged the fossil record of Homo erectus sensu lato (s.l.). Additional evidence comes from the Danakil Depression of Eritrea, where over 200 late Early to early Middle Pleistocene sites have been identified within a ∼1000 m-thick sedimentary succession outcropping in the Dandiero Rift Basin, near Buia. Along with an adult cranium (UA 31), which displays a blend of H. erectus-like and derived morpho-architectural features and three pelvic remains, two isolated permanent incisors (UA 222 and UA 369) have also been recovered from the 1 Ma (millions of years ago) Homo-bearing outcrop of Uadi Aalad. Since 2010, our surveys have expanded to the nearby (4.7 km) site of Mulhuli-Amo (MA). This is a fossiliferous area that has been preliminarily surveyed because of its exceptional concentration of Acheulean stone tools. So far, the site has yielded 10 human remains, including the unworn crown of a lower permanent molar (MA 93). Using diverse analytical tools (including high resolution μCT and μMRI), we analysed the external and internal macromorphology and microstructure of the three specimens, and whenever possible compared the results with similar evidence from early Homo, H. erectus s.l., H. antecessor, H. heidelbergensis (from North Africa), Neanderthals and modern humans. We also assessed the UA 369 lower incisor from Uadi Aalad for root completion timing and showed that it compares well with data for root apex closure in modern human populations.Journal of Human Evolution 05/2014; 74. DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.04.005 · 3.87 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "A new potential surrogate marker for osteoporosis, the internal magnetic field gradient (IMFG), has recently been proposed  . In cancellous bone, the susceptibility mismatch between the solid matrix and interstitial liquid marrow generates internal gradients at the interface between the bone and marrow      . "
ABSTRACT: Bone mineral density (BMD) result has a low predictive value on patients' risk for future fractures. Thus, new approaches for examining patients at risk for developing osteoporosis would be desirable. Magnetic resonance (MR) investigations in cancellous bone have been shown to yield useful quantitative information on both trabecular bone microstructure and bone marrow composition. This work was undertaken to address the hypothesis that the effective internal magnetic field gradient (IMFG), a new MR parameter, discriminates between healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic postmenopausal women, classified on the basis of bone mineral density (BMD) criteria. The work builds on preliminary results indicating that IMFG, measured in trabecular-bone pores and quantified by spin-echo decay and water diffusion MR near the bone - bone-marrow interface depends on both the bone-marrow water rate of diffusion and the magnetic susceptibility difference (DX) between water and bone. MR relaxometry, MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the heel was performed in fifty-five women (mean age, 62.9±6.6years) at 3T. Moreover, in order to study the reproducibility of IMFG measurement, five young women (mean age 31.0±3.2years; age range, 28-36years) were scanned and re-scanned. The study protocol was approved by local Ethics Committee. Quantitative Computer Tomography (QCT) of the L1-L3 vertebral segments was performed to classify the postmenopausal women into three groups according to QCT BMD: healthy (n=8); osteopenic (n=25); and osteoporotic (n=22). In all subjects, BMD T-scores, marrow-fat content (Mfc), T2*, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IMFG (estimated from the additional spin-echo decay due to diffusion of water in local magnetic field gradients), were assessed in the whole calcaneus as well as in three calcaneal subregions: subtalar, tuber calcaneus, and cavum calcaneus. Between-group comparisons to assess group differences and Pearson correlation analysis were performed. Short and long term coefficients of variation (CVS and CVL, respectively) were evaluated in young subjects. Reproducibility of IMFG measurement was satisfactory. No significant difference was found in IMFG measurement performed in both calcaneus and subtalar calcaneal region between the two separate sessions comprised of five young women. Mfc did not significantly differ between groups. IMFG in the subtalar region was significantly different between all three groups (P<0.01), being greatest in healthy women, intermediate in those with osteopenia, and lowest in osteoporotic subjects. Conversely neither T2* nor ADC are not able to discriminate healthy subjects from those with osteopenia and osteoporosis. Increased inter-trabecular space, as it typically occurs in patients with osteoporosis, modifies water diffusion, conferring higher ADC values, thereby lowering IMFG. The IMFG measured in the calcaneal subtalar region shows a high ability in identify healthy subjects. The new quantitative MR method based on measurement of IMFG may provide a new means for assessing patients with osteoporosis.Bone 07/2013; 57(1). DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.027 · 4.46 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE. A review of the innovative role molecular imaging plays in musculoskeletal radiology is provided. Musculoskeletal molecular imaging is under development in four key areas: imaging the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, imaging of molecular and cellular biomarkers of arthritic joint destruction, cellular imaging of osteomyelitis, and imaging generators of musculoskeletal pain. CONCLUSION. Together, these applications suggest that next-generation musculoskeletal radiology will facilitate quantitative visualization of molecular and cellular biomarkers, an advancement that appeared futuristic just a decade ago.American Journal of Roentgenology 06/2013; 201(2). DOI:10.2214/AJR.13.10713 · 2.74 Impact Factor