Article

Increase in opiate prescription in Germany between 2000 and 2010: a study based on insurance data.

PMV Research Group at the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne.
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International (Impact Factor: 3.61). 01/2013; 110(4):45-51. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0045
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Insufficient data have been available to date on the prevalence of opioid treatment in Germany, physicians' prescribing habits, and the percentages of cancer patients and non-cancer patients among those receiving opioids for an evaluation of the quality of care and an assessment of possible underuse or misuse.
The data analyzed in this study were derived from the statutory health insurance sample of the AOK health insurance company in the German state of Hesse / ASHIP Hesse for the years 2000-2010. For the purpose of this study, prevalence was defined as the percentage of insurees who received at least one outpatient prescription of an opioid (ATC N02A, excluding codeine, levomethadone and methadone). In order to control for population aging, the prevalence was standardized to the German population on December 31(st) of the preceding year and to the age-structure of the population as it was in 1999. Opioid prescribing for cancer was assumed when a cancer diagnosis was documented in the same year in which the opioid prescription was issued.
The percentage of insurees receiving at least one opioid prescription rose over the period of the study from 3.31% in 2000 to 4.53% in 2010, a relative gain of 37%. Opioids were mostly prescribed to patients with non-cancer pain (2010: about 77% of opioid recipients). The percentage of non-cancer patients receiving long-term opioid treatment has also increased over the period of the study.
As opioids are frequently prescribed for non-cancer pain, it cannot be inferred from the observed increase in opioid prescribing that cancer patients are now receiving better opioid treatment than they were before. Further issues of concern are the observed increases in the prescribing of potent immediate release opioids and in the long-term opioid treatment for non-cancer patients, the benefit of which is currently debated.

0 Followers
 · 
92 Views
  • Source
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Primarily used for treating malignant pain, opioids are recently applied for chronic non-tumor pain. For the lack of evidence based strategies from long-term studies, opioids are discussed controversially, esp. considering cost-benefit. The purpose of this study is to evaluate characteristics in prescribing opioids for tumor and non-tumor pain conditions. Cost effectiveness study/observational study SETTING/METHODS: Health insurance data of a German statutory health insurance company (N = 6.800.000, data acquisition from 2006 to 2010) was evaluated by assigning opioid prescriptions to certain pain related diagnoses using CART (Classification And Regression Tree) segmentation analysis. Age- and gender-specific characteristics of prescriptions were calculated. The number of prescriptions of opioid prescriptions increased linearly. Prescriptions of mild opioids were decreasing for non-tumor pain, but increasing for tumor pain, while the number of prescriptions of strong opioids was increasing both for tumor and nontumor pain. Differences occurred in terms of duration and kind of the preferred substances, including the considerations of common contraindications (e.g. somatoform disorders). The majority of strong opioids being prescribed for non-tumor pain were fentanyl pain patches for 40 to 45 year old males with average annual costs of 1833 Euros per patient. Out of 21000 patients with somatoform pain disorder, 44.4% were treated with opioids (20.7% with mild, 23.7% with strong opioids). The results did not consider if the opioid medication was actually taken by the patients. Another difference in terms of representativeness might occur since the gender distribution varies between the official statistical data and data collected by the health insurance company. Because of the acquisition of the data, no conclusions about possible correlation of pain syndromes and educational and social classes are possible. Tumor patients who received an opioid prescription for non-tumor pain could not be excluded. While the overall expenditure of the health insurance companies increased, it remains unknown which patient is receiving a particular opioid medication. Prescribing behavior was often not consistent with common indications and contraindications. Opioid therapy, chronic pain conditions.
    Pain physician 05/2015; 18(3):E 323 - E 331. · 4.77 Impact Factor