Primary ovarian carcinoid tumors may express CDX-2: a potential pitfall in distinction from metastatic intestinal carcinoid tumors involving the ovary.

Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
International journal of gynecological pathology: official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (Impact Factor: 1.63). 12/2008; 28(1):41-8. DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31817a8f51
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Carcinoid tumors of the ovary are rare neoplasms that may be primary or metastatic. Clinicopathologic features such as unilaterality and early stage favor a primary ovarian neoplasm but in the absence of other teratomatous elements it may be difficult or impossible to determine whether an ovarian carcinoid is primary or metastatic. CDX-2 is a marker of intestinal differentiation that has been proposed as a marker of midgut origin for metastatic carcinoids. Its expression has not been tested in ovarian carcinoids. Additional markers of potential help in defining the origin of a carcinoid include cytokeratin (CK) 20, CK7, and thyroid transcription factor (TTF-1), none of which have been studied in ovarian carcinoids. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of CDX-2, CK20, CK7, and TTF-1 as well as conventional clinicopathologic features in determining the site of origin in 26 ovarian carcinoids (16 primary and 10 metastatic from midgut). Non-neoplastic premenopausal ovaries (n=10) served as controls. All primary ovarian carcinoids were unilateral whereas only 3/10 metastatic carcinoids were unilateral. Multinodular growth occurred in 6/10 metastatic carcinoids but not in any primary carcinoid. The average size of primary ovarian carcinoids was 3.4 cm (range: 0.2-13.5 cm) versus 10.2 cm for metastatic carcinoids (range: 4-32 cm). Of the primary ovarian carcinoids, 12/16 were 3 cm or smaller whereas all metastatic carcinoids were 4 cm or larger. Teratomatous elements were present in association with 10/16 primary ovarian carcinoids, whereas none were present in any metastatic carcinoid. The primary ovarian carcinoid types were insular (n=6), trabecular (n=3), strumal (n=6, of which 5 were trabecular pattern and 1 was insular pattern) or mucinous (n=1). CDX-2 was not expressed in any cells in normal ovaries. Among primary ovarian neoplasms, there was diffuse nuclear CDX-2 expression in 4/6 insular, 0/3 trabecular, 1/6 strumal (1/1 insular pattern and 0/5 trabecular pattern strumal carcinoids), and 1/1 mucinous carcinoids. All metastatic carcinoids, except for two of mucinous type, were insular. CDX-2 was diffusely and strongly expressed in all 8 metastatic insular carcinoids and in both metastatic mucinous carcinoids. None of the metastases was trabecular in type but 12 primary hindgut or foregut trabecular carcinoids were evaluated and all were negative for CDX-2. None of the ovarian carcinoids expressed TTF-1, CK7, or CK20, except for the primary and metastatic mucinous carcinoids, all of which were CK20-positive. These results demonstrate that CDX-2 cannot be used to determine if a carcinoid is primary in the ovary or metastatic from the intestine as insular and mucinous types of either origin express this marker. Trabecular carcinoids of either origin lack CDX-2 expression. CK20, CK7, or TTF-1 do not have diagnostic utility in this context. Conventional clinicopathologic features (unilaterality, lack of multinodular growth, early stage, presence of teratomatous elements, and size 3 cm or smaller) are the most helpful findings in suggesting a primary origin for an ovarian carcinoid tumor.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tumors of the diffuse neuroendocrine cell system (DNES) may arise in any component of the gynecologic tract, including the vulva, vagina, cervix, endometrium, and ovary. Overall such tumors in the gynecologic tract are rare, constituting only 2% of gynecologic cancers, comprising a spectrum of tumors of variable biologic potential. Due to the rarity of such tumors, pathologists experience may be limited and these may present diagnostic challenges. Currently the nomenclature employed is still that of the pulmonary classification systems, carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, small and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma that broadly correlates to low/grade 1, intermediate/grade 2, and high grade/grade 3 of the WHO gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors classification. Furthermore in keeping with the lung, proliferative rate is assessed based on mitotic index rather than Ki-67 staining. In this review we cover select neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract.
    Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology 08/2013; 30(3):224-33. DOI:10.1053/j.semdp.2013.06.007 · 1.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Primary ovarian carcinoids and metastatic tumors share similar morphologic features. Metastatic carcinoids must be excluded from primary ones for prognostic and therapeutic reasons. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors are much more common with the majority arising from small intestine and appendix. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of immunohistochemistry for CDX2 in differentiating primary ovarian from metastatic carcinoids of primary gastrointestinal origin. Thirty primary pure ovarian carcinoids, 16 primary ovarian carcinoids arising in association with benign teratomas, 10 ovarian carcinoids metastatic from primary gastrointestinal tract and 70 gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors were studied for the expression of CDX2 by immunohistochemistry. CDX2 expression revealed that 40 (57.1%) of 70 cases of gastrointestinal carcinoids and 9 (90%) of 10 ovarian metastatic carcinoids showed positive nuclear staining (diffuse or focal). On the other hand, 3 (18.8%) of 16 primary carcinoids with teratomatous elements showed weak positivity. Among the 70 gastrointestinal carcinoids, CDX2 was positive in 38 (90.5%) of 42 cases in the duodenum, small intestine, appendix, and only in 2 (11.8%) of 17 cases of colorectal carcinoids and none of the 11 cases in the stomach. It is concluded that CDX2 may be a useful marker to distinguish primary ovarian carcinoid from metastasis from small intestinal and appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors.
    Human pathology 09/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.humpath.2013.06.014 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ovarian malignant germ cell tumors (OMGCTs) are heterogeneous tumors that are derived from the primitive germ cells of the embryonic gonad. OMGCTs are rare, accounting for about 2.6% of all ovarian malignancies, and typically manifest in adolescence, usually with abdominal pain, a palpable mass, and elevated serum tumor marker levels, which may serve as an adjunct in the initial diagnosis, monitoring during therapy, and posttreatment surveillance. Dysgerminoma, the most common malignant germ cell tumor, usually manifests as a solid mass. Immature teratomas manifest as a solid mass with scattered foci of fat and calcifications. Yolk sac tumors usually manifest as a mixed solid and cystic mass. Capsular rupture or the bright dot sign, a result of increased vascularity and the formation of small vascular aneurysms, may be present. Embryonal carcinomas and polyembryomas rarely manifest in a pure form and are more commonly part of a mixed germ cell tumor. Some OMGCTs have characteristic features that allow a diagnosis to be confidently made, whereas others have nonspecific features, which make them difficult to diagnose. However, imaging features, the patient's age at presentation, and tumor markers may help establish a reasonable differential diagnosis. Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors spread in the same manner as epithelial ovarian neoplasms but are more likely to involve regional lymph nodes. Preoperative imaging may depict local extension, peritoneal disease, and distant metastases. Suspicious areas may be sampled during surgery. Because OMGCTs are almost always unilateral and are chemosensitive, fertility-sparing surgery is the standard of care. ©RSNA, 2014.
    Radiographics 05/2014; 34(3):777-801. DOI:10.1148/rg.343130067 · 2.73 Impact Factor