Article

Special issues related to hematopoietic SCT in the Eastern Mediterranean region and the first regional activity report.

Adult HSCT, King Faisal Cancer Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bone marrow transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.47). 01/2009; 43(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2008.389
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although several centers are now performing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in the Eastern Mediterranean (EM) region, the availability is still limited. Special issues including compatible donor availability and potential for alternative donor programs are discussed. In comparison to Europe and North America, differences in patterns of diseases and pre-HSCT general status, particularly for patients with BM failure, are described. Other differences including high sero-positivity for CMV, hepatitis B and C infection, and specific observations about GVHD and its relation to genetically homogeneous communities are also discussed. We report that a total of 17 HSCT programs (performing five or more HSCTs annually) exist in 9 countries of the EM region. Only six programs are currently reporting to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation or Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research. A total of 7617 HSCTs have been performed by these programs including 5701 allogeneic HSCTs. The area has low-HSCT team density (1.56 teams per 10 million inhabitants vs 14.43 in Europe) and very low-HSCT team distribution (0.27 teams per 10 000 sq km area vs <1-6 teams in Europe). Gross national income per capita had no clear association with low-HSCT activity. Much improvement in infrastructure and formation of an EM regional HSCT registry are needed.

Full-text

Available from: Tahir Shamsi, May 26, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
385 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is one of the severe complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Systemic management including respiratory and circulatory support is necessary. In addition, abdominal paracentesis is often needed for pain relief and to reduce the pressure of tense ascites. Concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) involves the filtration, concentration, and reinfusion of drained ascites, which contributes to reuse of autologous proteins. CART has been reported as supportive therapy for patients with liver cirrhosis and cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the efficacy and safety of CART in three patients (two with acute myelogenous leukemia and one with chronic myeloid leukemia) who developed SOS after allo-HSCT. They all had symptomatic, tense, and diuretic-refractory ascites with right costal pain and marked weight gain. Two patients showed immediate improvement after CART. However, one patient experienced four CARTs with slow recovery. All patients are now alive and are being monitored as outpatients over 2 years with remission. No severe adverse event was observed related to CART, and 25.2-98.0 (median 30.2) grams of albumin was collected and reinfused. CART after paracentesis reduces protein loss in ascites by reinfusion of autologous protein instead of exogenous albumin preparations. Although transient fever is reported as a frequent adverse event, no events like severe bleeding or infection were observed. While its safety has not been fully established in patients with hematological disease after HSCT, CART may be a considerable supportive therapy for SOS with tense ascites.
    Artificial Organs 05/2013; 37(10). DOI:10.1111/aor.12080 · 1.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) activity significantly increased in the Eastern Mediterranean area over the past decade. However, comparative outcomes with longer established centers, especially European Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) centers, have not been reported. We compared outcomes of matched-sibling allogeneic HCT between East Mediterranean Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBMT) and EBMT centers for adult patients with AML in first CR using myeloablative conditioning. We matched 431 patients from EMBMT with 431 patients from EBMT centers according to patient, disease and transplant characteristics. EMBMT recipients and donors were more likely to be CMV seropositive. There were no significant differences in the incidence of acute or chronic GVHD, or the 3-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse incidence (RI) between the two groups (NRM: EMBMT=16% vs EBMT=11), (RI: EMBMT=13% vs EBMT=19%). Notably, the 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS were similar between the groups (LFS: EMBMT=70±2% vs EBMT=69±3%), (OS: EMBMT=74±2% vs EBMT=73±2%). Despite differences in socioeconomics, health resources and transplant experience, matched-sibling allogeneic HCT outcomes in emerging centers in the EMBMT region appear similar to EBMT centers.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 28 January 2013; doi:10.1038/bmt.2013.1.
    Bone marrow transplantation 01/2013; 48(8). DOI:10.1038/bmt.2013.1 · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This practice survey is conducted to analyze clinical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) practice variability among centers in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMRO), as represented by the Eastern Mediterranean Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBMT) group. This internet based survey was completed by the medical program directors of the EMBMT centers; 17 centers participated. The survey collected data on various clinical aspects of HSCT practice. Consistency in pre HSCT cardiac (100%), pulmonary (82%) and viral screen (100%) was observed. Obtaining informed consent was universal. Pre-HSCT psychological assessment is practiced in 50% of the centers. All centers used single-bedded rooms with HEPA filters. Visitor policy during neutropenic phase and the use of gowns, masks or gloves when examining patients varied among centers. MRSA/VRE screen and use of low bacterial diet were applied in 65% and 82%, respectively. Anti-bacterial prophylaxis is employed in 58% (Auto-SCT) and 60% (Allo-SCT) of the centers. Drug choice varied (cotrimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam); 60% of the centers used penicillin prophylaxis in GVHD patients. PCP prophylaxis is applied in 58% (Auto-SCT) and 87% (Allo-SCT) of the centers; cotrimoxazole is usually used. Anti-viral prophylaxis with acyclovir or, less commonly, valacyclovir is used in 70% (Auto-SCT) and 93% (Allo-SCT) of centers. Anti-fungal prophylaxis is applied in 70% (Auto-SCT), 93% (myeloablative Allo-SCT) and 87% (reduced intensity [RIC] Allo-SCT). Fluconazole is used in all Auto-SCT and majority of Allo-SCT recipients; few centers used other agents (itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B) in Allo-SCT. Prophylactic GCSF use varied among centers: Auto-SCT 77%, myeloablative Allo-SCT 33%, RIC Allo-SCT 27%. Use of ursodeoxycholic acid for venoocclusive disease (VOD) prophylaxis is variable: 60% (Allo-SCT) and 12% (Auto-SCT). Cyclosporine/methotrexate is the most commonly used GVHD prophylaxis in myeloablative Allo-SCT (93%); heterogeneity was seen in RIC SCT. Treatment of steroid refractory acute GVHD varied (ATG 53%, higher steroid dose 40%). CMV monitoring varied between antigenemia (53%) and PCR (40%) techniques. Pre-emptive anti CMV therapy is used in 86% of the centers, while 7% used routine CMV prophylaxis; 7% had no specific CMV management policy. Consistency was observed in areas of pre-SCT work up, use of single rooms, HEPA filters and GVHD prophylaxis. Heterogeneity is observed in other practice aspects including other isolation measures, anti-microbial prophylaxis, VOD prophylaxis, growth factor use and treatment of steroid refractory GVHD. Further studies are needed to probe the impact of such practice variations on post-transplant outcome and to ascertain the best clinical practice approach.
    Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy 03/2013; 6(1):14-9. DOI:10.1016/j.hemonc.2013.04.001