Does Investors' Sophistication Affect Persistence and Pricing of Discretionary Accruals?

Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP) 01/2007; 10(01):33-50. DOI: 10.1142/S0219091507000945
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This paper examines whether the sophistication of market investors influences management's strategy on discretionary accounting choice, and thus changes the persistence of discretionary accruals. The results show that the persistence of discretionary accruals for firms face with naive investors is lower than that for firms face with sophisticated investors. The results also demonstrate that sophisticated investors indeed incorporate the implications of current earnings components into future earnings in a more sufficient manner than naïve investors do.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study refines the accrual decomposition approach in Richardson et al. (Account Rev 81:713–743, 2006) and introduces a growth measure that is free from accounting distortions. My evidence indicates that the lower persistence of accruals extends to accruals that are unrelated to accounting distortions. I, however, find that the growth and accounting distortion components of accruals are not isolated. Growth may provide a context where firms have more incentives to manipulate earnings. I provide evidence that the persistence of both the growth and accounting distortion components of accruals is affected by firm growth and agency cost factors, such as free cash flows, leverage, and overvalued equity. I also document high accounting distortions for relatively high-growth firms that are close to reporting positive earnings, and negative accounting distortions for relatively low-growth firms that are far from the potential to report positive earnings.
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 01/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We posit that the effect of non-audit fees on audit quality is conditional on the extent of institutional monitoring. We suggest that institutional investors have incentives and the ability to monitor financial reporting quality. Because of the reputation concerns and potential litigation exposure, auditors are likely to provide high audit quality, when they also provide non-audit services to clients, particularly when clients are subject to high institutional monitoring. We find evidence that, as non-audit fees increase, audit quality (measured by performance-adjusted discretionary current accruals and earnings-response coefficients) reduces only for clients with low institutional ownership but not for clients with high institutional ownership. Our results are robust after controlling for auditor industry specialization, firms’ operating volatility, size effect, and potential endogeneity between institutional ownership and audit quality.
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 41(2).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examine managerial incentives underlying book accruals and tax accruals affecting stock prices. Due to the differential incentives underlying tax and financial reporting systems differences between book and tax earnings are likely to exist despite the requirements of tax conformity. It is widely argued in the literature that tax conformity will likely reduce opportunistic behavior. However, recent findings of Hanlon et al. (2006) indicate that tax conformity leads to tax-induced conservatism which in turn reduces the information content of earnings. Hanlon (2005) demonstrates the association between tax differences and the persistence of earnings. We decompose total accruals into discretionary tax accruals and non-discretionary tax accruals, discretionary book accruals and non-discretionary book accruals to examine how the market prices book versus tax accruals. As predicted, the evidence shows that during the period of 1986-2001 firms had increased the use of income decreasing discretionary tax accruals in an effort to reduce their tax liability. In contrast with prior studies, a test of equality of multivariate regression coefficients reveals that the persistence of the nondiscretionary book accruals is not significantly different than the cash flow component of earnings. This implies that by taking into account the tax incentives embedded in tax accruals provides a more transparent measure of book accruals that better reflects changes in earnings and firm value. The market's inability to correctly assess the persistence of accruals is more severe for tax accruals than for book accruals. In addition, a trading strategy of portfolios with high levels of discretionary tax accruals yields positive size-adjusted abnormal returns. These results suggest that the market has difficulty interpreting tax accruals either because of lack of sufficient disclosure regarding these accruals or lack of understanding of their tax consequences.
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 04/2006;


Available from