Tailoring Light-Matter Interaction with a Nanoscale Plasmon Resonator

Physical Review Letters (Impact Factor: 7.94). 01/2012; 108(22):226803. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.226803

ABSTRACT We propose and demonstrate a new approach for achieving strong light-matter
interactions with quantum emitters. Our approach makes use of a plasmon
resonator composed of defect-free, highly crystalline silver nanowires
surrounded by patterned dielectric distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs). These
resonators have an effective mode volume (Veff) two orders of magnitude below
the diffraction limit and quality factor (Q) approaching 100, enabling
enhancement of spontaneous emission rates by a factor exceeding 75 at the
cavity resonance. We also show that these resonators can be used to convert a
broadband quantum emitter to a narrowband single-photon source with
color-selective emission enhancement.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Optoelectronic metamaterials composed of nanoscale metallic structures and semiconductor quantum structures constitute a powerful platform to explore light-matter interaction and new devices. In this work, we numerically study an optoelectronically coupled metamaterial consisting of metallic double fishnet (DF) layers and semiconductor quantum well (QW) spacing layer. When the electronic intersubband transition (ISBT) in the QW coincides with the plasmonic resonances of the DF structure, the plasmon-matter interaction (PMI) can modify the optical properties considerably. In case of the ISBT-matching localized surface plasmons (LSP), i.e., f QW = f LSP, the polarization-selection-rule forbidden ISBT absorption can be enabled due to the nonnegligible E z field distributions while the retrieved optical constants remain almost unchanged. However, when the gap surface plasmons (GSP) are matched, i.e., f QW = f GSP, PMI exhibits a clear anti-crossing behavior implying strong coupling effects between ISBT and GSP resonance and formation of intersubband polaritons. The effective optical constants are therefore modulated appreciably. The large difference between GSP and LSP can be attributed to their distinctive resonance qualities (Q-factors) and polarization conversion ratios (99.28 % for GSP and 1.54 % for LSP) from the transverse electric (TE) to transverse magnetic (TM) mode. Our results provide insight into the physical mechanism of PMI in nanoscale semiconductor-plasmon hybrid systems and suggest an alternative means in tunable negative refractive index (NRI) applications.
    Plasmonics · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quantum plasmonics is a rapidly growing field of research that involves the study of the quantum properties of light and its interaction with matter at the nanoscale. Here, surface plasmons—electromagnetic excitations coupled to electron charge density waves on metal–dielectric interfaces or localized on metallic nanostructures—enable the confinement of light to scales far below that of conventional optics. We review recent progress in the experimental and theoretical investigation of the quantum properties of surface plasmons, their role in controlling light–matter interactions at the quantum level and potential applications. Quantum plasmonics opens up a new frontier in the study of the fundamental physics of surface plasmons and the realization of quantum-controlled devices, including single-photon sources, transistors and ultra-compact circuitry at the nanoscale. P lasmonics provides a unique setting for the manipulation of light via the confinement of the electromagnetic field to regions well below the diffraction limit 1,2 . This has opened up a wide range of applications based on extreme light concentration 3 , including nanophotonic lasers and amplifiers 4,5 , optical metamaterials 6 , biochemical sensing 7 and antennas trans-mitting and receiving light signals at the nanoscale 8 . These appli-cations and their rapid development have been made possible by the large array of experimental tools that have become available in recent years for nanoscale fabrication and theory tools in the form of powerful electromagnetic simulation methods. At the same time, and completely parallel to this remarkable progress, there has been a growing excitement about the prospects for exploring quantum properties of surface plasmons and building plasmonic devices that operate faithfully at the quantum level 9 . The hybrid nature of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) as 'quasi-particles' makes them intriguing from a fundamental point of view, with many of their quantum properties still largely unknown. In addition, their potential for providing strong coupling of light to emitter systems, such as quantum dots 10,11 and nitrogen–vacancy (NV) centres 12 , via highly confined fields offers new opportunities for the quantum control of light, enabling devices such as efficient single-photon sources 13–16 and transistors 17–19 to be realized. Although surface plasmons are well known to suffer from large losses, there are also attractive prospects for building devices that can exploit this lossy nature for controlling dissipative quantum dynamics 20 . This new field of research combining modern plasmonics with quantum optics has become known as 'quantum plasmonics'. In this Review, we describe the wide range of research activities being pursued in the field of quantum plasmonics. We begin with a short description of SPPs and their quantization. Then, we discuss one of the major strengths of plasmonic systems: the ability to provide highly confined electromagnetic fields. We describe how this enables the enhancement of light–matter interactions and the progress that has been made so far in demonstrating a variety of schemes that take advantage of it in the quantum regime. We also review key experiments that have probed fundamental quantum properties of surface plasmons and their potential for building compact nanophotonic circuitry. We conclude by providing an
    Nature Physics 06/2013; 9:329-340. · 19.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 12/2012; 18(6):1781. · 4.08 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jan 21, 2014