Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous t-PA versus t-PA Alone for Stroke

The authors' affiliations are listed in the Appendix.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 02/2013; 368(10). DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214300
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background Endovascular therapy is increasingly used after the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, but whether a combined approach is more effective than intravenous t-PA alone is uncertain. Methods We randomly assigned eligible patients who had received intravenous t-PA within 3 hours after symptom onset to receive additional endovascular therapy or intravenous t-PA alone, in a 2:1 ratio. The primary outcome measure was a modified Rankin scale score of 2 or less (indicating functional independence) at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). Results The study was stopped early because of futility after 656 participants had undergone randomization (434 patients to endovascular therapy and 222 to intravenous t-PA alone). The proportion of participants with a modified Rankin score of 2 or less at 90 days did not differ significantly according to treatment (40.8% with endovascular therapy and 38.7% with intravenous t-PA; absolute adjusted difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to 9.1, with adjustment for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score [8-19, indicating moderately severe stroke, or ≥20, indicating severe stroke]), nor were there significant differences for the predefined subgroups of patients with an NIHSS score of 20 or higher (6.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.4 to 18.1) and those with a score of 19 or lower (-1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, -10.8 to 8.8). Findings in the endovascular-therapy and intravenous t-PA groups were similar for mortality at 90 days (19.1% and 21.6%, respectively; P=0.52) and the proportion of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 30 hours after initiation of t-PA (6.2% and 5.9%, respectively; P=0.83). Conclusions The trial showed similar safety outcomes and no significant difference in functional independence with endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA, as compared with intravenous t-PA alone. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; number, NCT00359424 .).

Download full-text


Available from: Michael D Hill, Jun 10, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute ischemic stroke is a morbid and disabling medical condition with a significant social and economic impact throughout the world. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has been the first line treatment for patients presenting up to 4.5hours after symptom onset for many years. Endovascular stroke treatment has been used successfully as rescue therapy after failed IVT; in patients with contraindications to rtPA or presenting outside the 4.5-hour window. The effectiveness of IVT is high for distal thrombi but significantly lower for proximal occlusions. Endovascular treatment has been revolutionized by the evolution from intra-arterial thrombolysis and first generation mechanical devices to the current generation of stent retrievers and aspiration systems with large bore catheters. These devices have been associated with excellent revascularization, improved clinical outcomes, shorter procedure times and reduced device and procedure related complications. We report the current literature, clinical standards and perspectives on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Neuroradiology 02/2015; 42(1). DOI:10.1016/j.neurad.2014.11.002 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Large multicenter acute stroke trials demand a randomization procedure with a high level of treatment allocation randomness, an effective control on overall and within-site imbalances, and a minimized time delay of study treatment caused by the randomization procedure. Driven by the randomization algorithm design of A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Activase (Alteplase) in Patients with Mild Stroke (PRISMS) (NCT02072226), this paper compares operational and statistical properties of different randomization algorithms in local, central, and step-forward randomization settings. Results show that the step-forward randomization with block urn design provides better performances over others. If the concern on the potential time delay is not serious and a central randomization system is available, the minimization method with an imbalance control threshold and a biased coin probability could be a better choice.
    Contemporary Clinical Trials 01/2015; 41. DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.013 · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Object: This study aims to evaluate the use of endovascular therapy to treat very young (≤ 35 years) patients with acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion. Methods We identified from a prospectively maintained database young patients (≤ 35 years) undergoing endovascular intervention for AIS at two cerebrovascular referral centers. The study only included patients with a confirmed large vessel occlusion. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores were determined at 90 days during a follow-up visit. Results A total of 15 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 27.93 years ± 6.75 years (range: 9-35 years). On admission, the mean NIHSS score was 14.07 ± 9.16. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed using the Solitaire FR device in 4 of 15 (26.67%) patients and the Merci/Penumbra systems in 11 (73.33%) patients. Successful recanalization (TICI 2-3) was achieved in all but one patient (14/15; 93.33%). Only 1 patient (6.67%) had a hemorrhagic conversion following intervention; he later expired. The rate of 90-day favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was 86.67% (13/15) Conclusion Endovascular treatment in the very young population may be carried out with limited complications and attain remarkably high rate of recanalization and favorable outcome. This study supports the role of aggressive management strategies for very young patients with large vessel occlusion.
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 12/2014; 127. DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.09.022 · 1.25 Impact Factor