Effect of Plane of Arm Elevation on Glenohumeral Kinematics A Normative Biplane Fluoroscopy Study

Department of BioMedical Engineering, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 1000, Vail, CO 81657.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 4.31). 02/2013; 95(3):238-45. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01875
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background: Understanding glenohumeral motion in normal and pathologic states requires the precise measurement of shoulder kinematics. The effect of the plane of arm elevation on glenohumeral translations and rotations remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to measure the three-dimensional glenohumeral translations and rotations during arm elevation in healthy subjects. Methods: Eight male subjects performed scaption and forward flexion, and five subjects (three men and two women) performed abduction, inside a dynamic biplane fluoroscopy system. Bone geometries were extracted from computed tomography images and used to determine the three-dimensional position and orientation of the humerus and scapula in individual frames. Descriptive statistics were determined for glenohumeral joint rotations and translations, and linear regressions were performed to calculate the scapulohumeral rhythm ratio. Results: The scapulohumeral rhythm ratio was 2.0 +/- 0.4:1 for abduction, 1.6 +/- 0.5:1 for scaption, and 1.1 +/- 0.3:1 for forward flexion, with the ratio for forward flexion being significantly lower than that for abduction (p = 0.002). Humeral head excursion was largest in abduction (5.1 +/- 1.1 mm) and smallest in scaption (2.4 +/- 0.6 mm) (p < 0.001). The direction of translation, as determined by the linear regression slope, was more inferior during abduction (-2.1 +/- 1.8 mm/90 degrees) compared with forward flexion (0.1 +/- 10.9 mm/90 degrees) (p = 0.024). Conclusions: Scapulohumeral rhythm significantly decreased as the plane of arm elevation moved in an anterior arc from abduction to forward flexion. The amount of physiologic glenohumeral excursion varied significantly with the plane of elevation, Was smallest for scaption, and showed inconsistent patterns across subjects with the exception of consistent inferior translation during abduction.

  • 07/2013; 1(2). DOI:10.1177/2325967113496059
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Local and global optimization algorithms have been developed to estimate joint kinematics to reducing soft movement artifact (STA). Such algorithms can include weightings to account for different STA occur at each marker. The objective was to quantify the benefit of optimal weighting and determine if optimal marker weightings can improve humerus kinematics accuracy. A pin with five reflective markers was inserted into the humerus of four subjects. Seven markers were put on the skin of the arm. Subjects performed 38 different tasks including arm elevation, rotation, daily-living tasks, and sport activities. In each movement, mean and peak errors in skin- vs. pins-orientation were reported. Then, optimal marker weightings were found to best match skin- and pin-based orientation. Without weighting, the error of the arm orientation ranged from 1.9° to 17.9°. With weighting, 100% of the trials were improved and the average error was halved. The mid-arm markers weights were close to 0 for three subjects. Weights of a subject applied to the others for a given movement, and weights of a movement applied to others for a given subject did not systematically increased accuracy of arm orientation. Without weighting, a redundant set of marker and least square algorithm improved accuracy to estimate arm orientation compared to data of the literature using electromagnetic sensor. Weightings were subject- and movement-specific, which reinforces that STA are subject- and movement-specific. However, markers on the deltoid insertion and on lateral and medial epicondyles may be preferred if a limited number of markers is used. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Biomechanics 04/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.023 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background:Patients who have shoulder pain usually have compensatory or contributory deviation of shoulder motion during arm elevation. In the traditional scapulohumeral rhythm, the share of the acromioclavicular (AC) and the sternoclavicular (SC) joint movements and also the role of AC internal rotation angle are unknown.Objectives:The main purpose of this study was to measure and compare the segmentary scapulohumeral rhythm (SSHR) during scapular arm elevation at a steady rotational speed in athletes with and without impingement syndrome.Patients and Methods:Using a speedometer, the maximum speed of arm elevation was measured in 21 men in each of the involved and uninvolved groups. Using fluoroscopy on the dominant side, SSHR during scapular arm elevation at a rotational speed equal to 1/30 of maximum speed was compared between the two groups. The ratio of glenohumeral (GH) elevation angle to AC rotation angle in the scapular plane was considered as SSHR.Results:The maximum speed of arm elevation between the two groups was significantly different (P < 0.001). The rhythm of the involved group significantly exceeded the rhythm of the uninvolved group in a part of the first quarter range of the arm elevation. SSHR during arm elevation in the uninvolved group did not change significantly (P = 0.845); however, it decreased significantly in the involved group (P = 0.024).Conclusions:Speed differences between the two groups were probably due to the pain in some ranges of arm elevation. SSHR in the involved group probably changed in order to compensate downward rotation of the scapula in the resting position. Study of the AC upward rotation range can be misleading; therefore, the study of scapulohumeral rhythm is recommended.
    Iranian Journal of Radiology 05/2014; 11(2):e14821. DOI:10.5812/iranjradiol.14821 · 0.18 Impact Factor