Brief Report: Is Cognitive Rehabilitation Needed in Verbal Adults with Autism? Insights from Initial Enrollment in a Trial of Cognitive Enhancement Therapy.

School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, 2117 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA, .
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.06). 02/2013; DOI: 10.1007/s10803-013-1774-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cognitive rehabilitation is an emerging set of potentially effective interventions for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder, yet the applicability of these approaches for "high functioning" adults who have normative levels of intelligence remains unexplored. This study examined the initial cognitive performance characteristics of 40 verbal adults with autism enrolled in a pilot trial of Cognitive Enhancement Therapy to investigate the need for cognitive rehabilitation in this population. Results revealed marked and broad deficits across neurocognitive and social-cognitive domains, despite above-average IQ. Areas of greatest impairment included processing speed, cognitive flexibility, and emotion perception and management. These findings indicate the need for comprehensive interventions designed to enhance cognition among verbal adults with autism who have intact intellectual functioning.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research evidence for cognitive remediation therapy's (CRT) effectiveness for anorexia nervosa (AN) has been gathering. This approach is also increasingly being implemented in other disorders including major depressive disorder, obsessive–compulsive disorder and autistic spectrum disorder that share commonalities with AN in neuropsychological profiles and clinical presentations. This systematic literature review identified and appraised the current evidence base to see whether evidence from related conditions could be integrated into the theoretical understanding of CRT for AN as well as future AN treatment developments and research.Overall, CRT studies in AN report promising findings, and CRT appears to be associated with improvements in set-shifting and in central coherence. Cognitive remediation approaches in other conditions also show promising evidence in associated improvements in areas of executive functioning and information processing; links are made between AN treatment and what future treatment developments could consider. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
    European Eating Disorders Review 11/2014; 22(6). DOI:10.1002/erv.2326 · 1.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article discusses the findings of an ethnographically oriented study that examined the multi-communication (MC) practices in four multinationals in the telecommunications, management consultancy, marketing and banking industries based in London, UK. The study followed a multi-data approach (MDA) that combined a survey, a series of interviews, three shadowing sessions and a number of documents and artefacts (e.g., computer screenshots) as its data sets. The main findings reveal that MC, defined as holding multiple conversations at the same time, requires people to make strategic decisions about (a) thematic threading (bringing together communication tasks on the same topic) and (b) presence allocation (spreading communicator’s presence over a number of communication instances), and corporations to provide the media and training for (c) media packaging (deciding what media work well together) and (d) audience profiling (grouping diverse audiences by similar needs/requests). Based on these findings, the article examines implications for the business English (BE) class and features a number of technology-enhanced pedagogical tasks to help students to be better prepared for the communication demands of today’s workplace. The design of the tasks, which is informed by the results of the present research, aspires to show research-informed pedagogical interventions for the communication class in BE.
    English for Specific Purposes 07/2014; 35:1–16. DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2013.11.002 · 1.28 Impact Factor


Available from
May 27, 2014

Similar Publications