Cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal and influenza vaccination standing order programs

Department of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA. E-mail: .
The American journal of managed care (Impact Factor: 2.26). 02/2013; 19(1):e30-7.
Source: PubMed


Objectives: Despite the benefits of vaccination and guidelines for their use, the rates for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination remain below the 90% goal set by Healthy People 2010 for persons 65 years and older. Standing order programs (SOPs) authorize vaccination administration without physician orders. Here we examine the cost-effectiveness of SOPs to improve both pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates in outpatient settings for individuals 65 years and older. Study Design: Decision analysis-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of outpatient SOPs for pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV) and influenza vaccination in hypothetical US population cohorts 65 years and older. Vaccination rate improvement data were obtained from the medical literature. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Active Bacterial Core surveillance data and US national databases were used to estimate costs and outcomes. Results: SOPs cost $14,171 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained compared with no program from a third-party payer perspective. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, the SOP strategy cost less than $50,000/QALY if SOPs increased absolute vaccination rates by 4% or more (base case: 18%), annual SOP costs were less than $21 per person (base case: $4.60), or annual influenza incidence was 4% or more (base case: 10%). Model results were insensitive to other individual parameter variations, and were supported by a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: SOPs used to improve PPSV and influenza vaccination rates in outpatient settings is a promising and economically favorable investment, with cost-effectiveness analysis results remaining robust to parameter variation over clinically plausible ranges.

Download full-text


Available from: Chyongchiou Jeng (C.J.) Lin,
  • Source
    • "Their use has also become widespread in the area of vaccination, where they are used to permit pharmacists or other providers to administer vaccinations for some common diseases without the recipient receiving an individual prescription for the vaccine (Lin et al., 2013). Vaccination standing order programs have been shown to increase uptake of vaccination against several diseases, and have proven highly cost-effective (Bardenheier et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2013; Middleton et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Opioid overdose, which has reached epidemic levels in the United States, is reversible by administration of the medication naloxone. Naloxone requires a prescription but is not a controlled substance and has no abuse potential. In the last half-decade, the majority of states have modified their laws to increase layperson access to the medication. Methods: We utilized a structured legal research protocol to systematically identify and review all statutes and regulations related to layperson naloxone access in the United States that had been adopted as of September, 2015. Each law discovered via this process was reviewed and coded by two trained legal researchers. Results: As of September, 2015, 43 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws intended to increase layperson naloxone access. We categorized these laws into three domains: (1) laws intended to increase naloxone prescribing and distribution, (2) laws intended to increase pharmacy naloxone access, and (3) laws intended to encourage overdose witnesses to summon emergency responders. These laws vary greatly across states in such characteristics as the types of individuals who can receive a prescription for naloxone, whether laypeople can dispense the medication, and immunity provided to those who prescribe, dispense and administer naloxone or report an overdose emergency. Conclusions: Most states have now passed laws intended to increase layperson access to naloxone. While these laws will likely reduce overdose morbidity and mortality, the cost of naloxone and its prescription status remain barriers to more widespread access.
    Drug and alcohol dependence 10/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.013 · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pharmacoeconomic analyses are performed preferentially in developed countries where there is an imperative to obtain “value for money” and to achieve cost-effectiveness. Such analyses are performed in low-income/developing countries and middle-income countries, partly to save scarce resources but also to improve the overall economic outlook, promote productivity gains, and foster further investment in vaccination. Analyses appear to be performed preferentially for therapeutic products as opposed to vaccines, but this may change as the impact of applying the results of pharmacoeconomic analyses of vaccines are measured and quantified.
    Cocuk Enfeksiyon Dergisi 09/2014; 8(3):110-120. DOI:10.5152/ced.2014.0007
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations are recommended for elderly and high-risk patients; however, rates of adherence are low. We sought to implement influenza and pneumococcal vaccine initiatives in 4 different ambulatory specialty practices, using 3 unique approaches. Methods. Four specialties with high-risk patient populations were selected for intervention: allergy (asthma), infectious disease (ID) (human immunodeficiency virus), pulmonary (chronic lung disease), and rheumatology (immunocompromised). Allergy and ID focused on influenza vaccination, and pulmonary and rheumatology focused on pneumococcal vaccination. We used 3 strategies for quality improvement: physician reminders, patient letters, and a nurse-driven model. Physicians were provided their performance data on a monthly basis and presented trended data on a quarterly basis at staff meetings. Results. All 4 specialties developed processes for improving vaccination rates with all showing some increase. Higher rates were achieved with pneumococcal vaccine than influenza. Pneumococcal vaccine rates showed steady improvement from year to year while influenza vaccine rates remained relatively constant. Allergy's influenza rate was 59% in 2011 and 64% in the 2014 flu season. Infectious disease influenza rates moved from 74% in the 2011 flu season to 86% for the 2014 season. Pneumococcal vaccine in pulmonary patients' rate was 52% at the start of intervention in February 2009 and 79% as of January 2015. Rheumatology rates rose from 50% in February 2009 to 87% in January 2015. Conclusions. Integrated routine workflow and performance data sharing can effectively engage specialists and staff in vaccine adherence improvement. Influenza vaccination may require other approaches to achieve the rates seen with pneumococcal vaccine.
    12/2015; 2(4):ofv119. DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofv119