Article

Peri-implant Disease and Chronic Periodontitis: Is Interleukin-6 Gene Promoter Polymorphism the Common Risk Factor in a Brazilian Population?

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants (Impact Factor: 1.49). 01/2013; 28(1):35-43. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2867
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Purpose: To investigate the association between interleukin-6 (IL-6) G174C polymorphism and susceptibility to peri-implant disease (PID) and/or chronic periodontitis (CP), in Brazilian subjects. Materials and Methods: A total of 103 Brazilian patients were submitted to peri-implant and periodontal examination. According to their peri-implant characteristics, patients were divided into: group A (healthy, n = 52), group B (peri-implant mucositis, n = 20), and group C (peri-implantitis, n = 31). All patients (n = 103) were also characterized as healthy periodontium patients without CP (HP, n = 60) or CP patients (CP, n = 43). DNA was extracted from buccal cells, and the IL-6 G174C polymorphism was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Differences in the prevalence of genotypes and alleles between healthy and ill patients were analyzed by chi-square test (P < .05), considering PID, CP, and PID+CP. Results: Results considered the presence of PID and/or CP in all patients. The CC genotype was the least common in all groups. The chi-square test showed no significant correlation between genotypes. However, the odds ratio showed that individuals with GG genotype and allele G were 1.53 and 1.43 times more susceptible to PID, respectively. The risk of presenting CP was increased in patients with GG genotype and allele G 1.35 and 1.24 times, respectively. When both diseases were evaluated together, patients with GG genotypes and allele G were 1.75 and 1.50 times more likely to present PID and CP together. When PID was evaluated without CP, patients with allele G were 2.08 times more susceptible to PID. Conclusions: The frequency of the genotype IL-6 174GG and allele G was different between healthy and ill groups. Therefore, this genotype may be a common risk factor for both CP and PID in Brazilian populations.

1 Follower
 · 
130 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background To develop preventive strategies addressing peri-implant diseases, a thorough understanding of the epidemiology is required.AimThe aim was to systematically assess the scientific literature in order to evaluate the prevalence, extent and severity of peri-implant diseases.Material & Methods Data were extracted from identified studies. Meta-analyses for prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis were performed. The effect of function time and disease definition on the prevalence of peri-implantitis was evaluated by meta-regression analyses. Data on extent and severity of peri-implant diseases was estimated if not directly reported.Results15 articles describing 11 studies were included. Case definitions for mucositis and peri-implantitis varied. The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis ranged from 19-65% and from 1-47%, respectively. Meta-analyses estimated weighted mean prevalences of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis of 43% (CI: 32-54%) and 22% (CI: 14-30%), respectively. The meta-regression showed a positive relationship between prevalence of peri-implantitis and function time and a negative relationship between prevalence of peri-implantitis and threshold for bone loss. Extent and severity of peri-implant diseases were rarely reported.Conclusion Future studies on the epidemiology of peri-implant diseases should consider (i) applying consistent case definitions and (ii) assessing random patient samples of adequate size and function time.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 12/2014; 42. DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12334 · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Peri-implantitis is a chronic inflammation, resulting in loss of supporting bone around implants. Chronic periodontitis is a risk indicator for implant failure. Both diseases have a common etiology regarding inflammatory destructive response. BRINP3 gene is associated with aggressive periodontitis. However, is still unclear if chronic periodontitis and peri-implantitis have the same genetic background. The aim of this work was to investigate the association between BRINP3 genetic variation (rs1342913 and rs1935881) and expression and susceptibility to both diseases. Methods: Periodontal and peri-implant examinations were performed in 215 subjects, divided into: healthy (without chronic periodontitis and peri-implantitis, n = 93); diseased (with chronic periodontitis and peri-implantitis, n = 52); chronic periodontitis only (n = 36), and peri-implantitis only (n = 34). A replication sample of 92 subjects who lost implants and 185 subjects successfully treated with implants were tested. DNA was extracted from buccal cells. Two genetic markers of BRINP3 (rs1342913 and rs1935881) were genotyped using TaqMan chemistry. Chi-square (p < 0.05) compared genotype and allele frequency between groups. A subset of subjects (n = 31) had gingival biopsies harvested. The BRINP3 mRNA levels were studied by C-T method (2(Delta Delta CT)). Mann-Whitney test correlated the levels of BRINP3 in each group (p < 0.05). Results: Statistically significant association between BRINP3 rs1342913 and peri-implantitis was found in both studied groups (p = 0.04). The levels of BRINP3 mRNA were significantly higher in diseased subjects compared to healthy individuals (p = 0.01). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the BRINP3 polymorphic variant rs1342913 and low level of BRINP3 expression are associated with peri-implantitis, independently from the presence of chronic periodontitis.
    BMC Oral Health 12/2015; 15(1). DOI:10.1186/s12903-015-0018-6 · 1.15 Impact Factor