Article

Immunogenicity of Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Derivatives

Stanford University School of Medicine, Lorry Lokey Stem Cell Research Bldg, 265 Campus Dr, Room G1120B, Stanford, CA 94305-5454. .
Circulation Research (Impact Factor: 11.09). 02/2013; 112(3):549-561. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.249243
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The ability of pluripotent stem cells to self-renew and differentiate into all somatic cell types brings great prospects to regenerative medicine and human health. However, before clinical applications, much translational research is necessary to ensure that their therapeutic progenies are functional and nontumorigenic, that they are stable and do not dedifferentiate, and that they do not elicit immune responses that could threaten their survival in vivo. For this, an in-depth understanding of their biology, genetic, and epigenetic make-up and of their antigenic repertoire is critical for predicting their immunogenicity and for developing strategies needed to assure successful long-term engraftment. Recently, the expectation that reprogrammed somatic cells would provide an autologous cell therapy for personalized medicine has been questioned. Induced pluripotent stem cells display several genetic and epigenetic abnormalities that could promote tumorigenicity and immunogenicity in vivo. Understanding the persistence and effects of these abnormalities in induced pluripotent stem cell derivatives is critical to allow clinicians to predict graft fate after transplantation, and to take requisite measures to prevent immune rejection. With clinical trials of pluripotent stem cell therapy on the horizon, the importance of understanding immunologic barriers and devising safe, effective strategies to bypass them is further underscored. This approach to overcome immunologic barriers to stem cell therapy can take advantage of the validated knowledge acquired from decades of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Joseph C Wu, Mar 23, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
86 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) could be used to generate autologous cells for therapeutic purposes, which are expected to be tolerated by the recipient. However, iPSC-derived grafts are at risk of giving rise to teratomas in the host, if residuals of tumorigenic cells are not rejected by the recipient. We have analyzed the susceptibility of hiPSC lines to allogeneic and autologous natural killer (NK) cells. IL-2-activated, in contrast to resting NK cells killed hiPSC lines efficiently (P=1.69x10-39). Notably, the specific lysis of the individual hiPSC lines by IL-2-activated NK cells was significantly different (P=1.72x10-6) and ranged between 46 % and 64 % in 51Cr-release assays when compared to K562 cells. The hiPSC lines were killed by both allogeneic and autologous NK cells although autologous NK cells were less efficient (P=8.63x10-6). Killing was partly dependent on the activating NK receptor DNAM-1 (P=8.22x10-7). The DNAM-1 ligands CD112 and CD155 as well as the NKG2D ligands MICA and MICB were expressed on the hiPSC lines. Low amounts of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I proteins, which serve as ligands for inhibitory and activating NK receptors were also detected. Thus, the susceptibility to NK cell killing appears to constitute a common feature of hiPSCs. Therefore, NK cells might reduce the risk of teratoma formation even after autologous transplantations of pluripotent stem cell-derived grafts that contain traces of pluripotent cells.
    PLoS ONE 05/2015; 10(5):e0125544. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0125544 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease caused by T cell-mediated destruction of insulin-producing β cells in the islets of Langerhans. In most cases, reversal of disease would require strategies combining islet cell replacement with immunotherapy that are currently available only for the most severely affected patients. Here, we demonstrate that immunotherapies that target T cell costimulatory pathways block the rejection of xenogeneic human embryonic-stem-cell-derived pancreatic endoderm (hESC-PE) in mice. The therapy allowed for long-term development of hESC-PE into islet-like structures capable of producing human insulin and maintaining normoglycemia. Moreover, short-term costimulation blockade led to robust immune tolerance that could be transferred independently of regulatory T cells. Importantly, costimulation blockade prevented the rejection of allogeneic hESC-PE by human PBMCs in a humanized model in vivo. These results support the clinical development of hESC-derived therapy, combined with tolerogenic treatments, as a sustainable alternative strategy for patients with T1D. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Cell Stem Cell 12/2014; 16(2). DOI:10.1016/j.stem.2014.12.001 · 22.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Outcomes of stem cell trials in patients with advanced heart failure have been divergent, which has raised some scepticism about this therapy and led to recommending slowing clinical trials until basic issues have been more thoroughly addressed. It is therefore timely and relevant to examine the current data and discuss how recent findings may change the perspectives of stem cell therapy. The most important recent change has been a shift in the mechanistic paradigm. Although the initial objective of stem cells was to physically replace dead cardiomyocytes and build a new electromechanically integrated myocardial tissue, it is now recognized that the unavoidable death of most of the transplanted cells makes this objective unrealistic. Indeed, the primary mechanism of action of the cells seems to be paracrine through the release of factors activating the endogenous signalling pathways, leading to cardioprotection. This hypothesis has several implications. First, it leads to focus on the efficiency of early retention, rather than on sustained survival, which, in turn, implies improving delivery approaches, largely through an increased reliance on adjunctive biomaterials; second, it may rationalize the use of allogeneic cells as long as their rejection is delayed to give them enough time for releasing the signalling biomolecules; and, finally, it raises the possibility that transplantation of cells could be replaced by the delivery of their sole secretome, possibly under the form of microvesicles. Put together, these approaches could streamline the translational process and enhance large-scale clinical applications.
    Current Opinion in Cardiology 12/2014; 30(2). DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000138 · 2.59 Impact Factor